A(nother) lost opportunity?
<p>The October meeting of the European Council (EUCO) was its first occasion to react to the declaration by the Polish “Constitutional Tribunal” that several provisions of the Treaty on European Union are incompatible with Poland’s Constitution and consequently inapplicable to the country. The...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | deu |
| Published: |
Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog GmbH
|
| Series: | Verfassungsblog |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://verfassungsblog.de/another-lost-opportunity/ |
| _version_ | 1818189743384428544 |
|---|---|
| author | Christophe Hillion |
| author_facet | Christophe Hillion |
| author_sort | Christophe Hillion |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <p>The October meeting of the European Council (EUCO) was its first occasion to react to the declaration by the Polish “Constitutional Tribunal” that several provisions of the Treaty on European Union are incompatible with Poland’s Constitution and consequently inapplicable to the country. The express denunciation of fundamental provisions of EU primary law by one of its members (with the support of another), while insisting on his country remaining part of the Union, is a situation the EUCO could hardly overlook. And yet, not a word about the unfolding constitutional crisis was included in the EUCO Conclusions. Various elements may explain the restraint. However, the complete muteness from the EU crisis-manager-in-chief is more questionable and may carry a disquieting message.</p>
|
| first_indexed | 2024-12-11T23:47:40Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-171389baacc74c01b3a3af8ee63b5aac |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2366-7044 |
| language | deu |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-11T23:47:40Z |
| publisher | Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog GmbH |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Verfassungsblog |
| spelling | doaj.art-171389baacc74c01b3a3af8ee63b5aac2022-12-22T00:45:34ZdeuMax Steinbeis Verfassungsblog GmbHVerfassungsblog2366-70442366-7044A(nother) lost opportunity?Christophe Hillion<p>The October meeting of the European Council (EUCO) was its first occasion to react to the declaration by the Polish “Constitutional Tribunal” that several provisions of the Treaty on European Union are incompatible with Poland’s Constitution and consequently inapplicable to the country. The express denunciation of fundamental provisions of EU primary law by one of its members (with the support of another), while insisting on his country remaining part of the Union, is a situation the EUCO could hardly overlook. And yet, not a word about the unfolding constitutional crisis was included in the EUCO Conclusions. Various elements may explain the restraint. However, the complete muteness from the EU crisis-manager-in-chief is more questionable and may carry a disquieting message.</p> https://verfassungsblog.de/another-lost-opportunity/Art. 7 TEU, EUCO, Rule of Law |
| spellingShingle | Christophe Hillion A(nother) lost opportunity? Verfassungsblog Art. 7 TEU, EUCO, Rule of Law |
| title | A(nother) lost opportunity? |
| title_full | A(nother) lost opportunity? |
| title_fullStr | A(nother) lost opportunity? |
| title_full_unstemmed | A(nother) lost opportunity? |
| title_short | A(nother) lost opportunity? |
| title_sort | a nother lost opportunity |
| topic | Art. 7 TEU, EUCO, Rule of Law |
| url | https://verfassungsblog.de/another-lost-opportunity/ |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT christophehillion anotherlostopportunity |