Economic evaluation of infliximab, synthetic triple therapy and methotrexate in the treatment of newly diagnosed juvenile idiopathic arthritis

Abstract Background Evaluation of costs and short-term cost-effectiveness of infliximab plus methotrexate (IFX + MTX); triple therapy of hydroxychloquine, sulphasalazine, and methotrexate (TRIPLE); or methotrexate monotherapy (MTX) in patients with new-onset polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthrit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maarit Tarkiainen, Pirjo Tynjälä, Paula Vähäsalo, Kristiina Aalto, Liisa Kröger, Katariina Rebane, Pekka Lahdenne, Janne Martikainen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2022-11-01
Series:Pediatric Rheumatology Online Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12969-022-00748-w
_version_ 1811319328252887040
author Maarit Tarkiainen
Pirjo Tynjälä
Paula Vähäsalo
Kristiina Aalto
Liisa Kröger
Katariina Rebane
Pekka Lahdenne
Janne Martikainen
author_facet Maarit Tarkiainen
Pirjo Tynjälä
Paula Vähäsalo
Kristiina Aalto
Liisa Kröger
Katariina Rebane
Pekka Lahdenne
Janne Martikainen
author_sort Maarit Tarkiainen
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Evaluation of costs and short-term cost-effectiveness of infliximab plus methotrexate (IFX + MTX); triple therapy of hydroxychloquine, sulphasalazine, and methotrexate (TRIPLE); or methotrexate monotherapy (MTX) in patients with new-onset polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). Methods In a prospective multicenter study (ACUTE-JIA), costs and health outcomes of 60 randomized patients with new-onset disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD)-naïve polyarticular JIA were analyzed during the first year. A mapping algorithm was used to obtain utility values from Child Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ). Wallace criteriae were used to assess clinically inactive disease (CID). Linear regression with non-parametric bootstrapping was used to adjust imbalances at baseline. Results Using prices for IFX biosimilar, adjusted annual mean (SD) costs of treatment (€) were 21,164 (4158), 12,136 (5286), and 18,300 (8635) on IFX + MTX, TRIPLE, and MTX, respectively. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for IFX + MTX as compared with TRIPLE or MTX were 3442 € or 678 € per additional month spent in CID. Mean (SD) quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for IFX + MTX, TRIPLE and MTX were 0.755 (0.065), 0.725 (0.062), and 0.686 (0.124). ICER for IFX + MTX vs TRIPLE was 294,433 €, and for IFX + MTX vs MTX 31,435 € per QALY gained. Conclusions In short-term, biosimilar IFX + MTX can be considered cost-effective when compared with MTX alone. TRIPLE was cost-effective when compared with MTX and showed cost advantage when compared with IFX + MTX. Cost per time spent in CID showed similar results than ICER evaluations. Trial registration This trial was primarily registered with the Ethical Board of Helsinki District University Hospital ( https://www.hus.fi ), clinical trial number 211864, and later with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01015547.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T12:40:38Z
format Article
id doaj.art-17423575bfb142178e736947117421ee
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1546-0096
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T12:40:38Z
publishDate 2022-11-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Pediatric Rheumatology Online Journal
spelling doaj.art-17423575bfb142178e736947117421ee2022-12-22T02:46:31ZengBMCPediatric Rheumatology Online Journal1546-00962022-11-012011810.1186/s12969-022-00748-wEconomic evaluation of infliximab, synthetic triple therapy and methotrexate in the treatment of newly diagnosed juvenile idiopathic arthritisMaarit Tarkiainen0Pirjo Tynjälä1Paula Vähäsalo2Kristiina Aalto3Liisa Kröger4Katariina Rebane5Pekka Lahdenne6Janne Martikainen7New Children’s Hospital, Helsinki University Central HospitalPediatric Research Center, University of HelsinkiPEDEGO Research Unit, University of OuluNew Children’s Hospital, Helsinki University Central HospitalDepartment of pediatrics, Kuopio University HospitalNew Children’s Hospital, Helsinki University Central HospitalNew Children’s Hospital, Helsinki University Central HospitalSchool of Pharmacy, University of Eastern FinlandAbstract Background Evaluation of costs and short-term cost-effectiveness of infliximab plus methotrexate (IFX + MTX); triple therapy of hydroxychloquine, sulphasalazine, and methotrexate (TRIPLE); or methotrexate monotherapy (MTX) in patients with new-onset polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). Methods In a prospective multicenter study (ACUTE-JIA), costs and health outcomes of 60 randomized patients with new-onset disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD)-naïve polyarticular JIA were analyzed during the first year. A mapping algorithm was used to obtain utility values from Child Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ). Wallace criteriae were used to assess clinically inactive disease (CID). Linear regression with non-parametric bootstrapping was used to adjust imbalances at baseline. Results Using prices for IFX biosimilar, adjusted annual mean (SD) costs of treatment (€) were 21,164 (4158), 12,136 (5286), and 18,300 (8635) on IFX + MTX, TRIPLE, and MTX, respectively. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for IFX + MTX as compared with TRIPLE or MTX were 3442 € or 678 € per additional month spent in CID. Mean (SD) quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for IFX + MTX, TRIPLE and MTX were 0.755 (0.065), 0.725 (0.062), and 0.686 (0.124). ICER for IFX + MTX vs TRIPLE was 294,433 €, and for IFX + MTX vs MTX 31,435 € per QALY gained. Conclusions In short-term, biosimilar IFX + MTX can be considered cost-effective when compared with MTX alone. TRIPLE was cost-effective when compared with MTX and showed cost advantage when compared with IFX + MTX. Cost per time spent in CID showed similar results than ICER evaluations. Trial registration This trial was primarily registered with the Ethical Board of Helsinki District University Hospital ( https://www.hus.fi ), clinical trial number 211864, and later with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01015547.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12969-022-00748-wJuvenile idiopathic arthritisBiological therapyDisease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs; health economic evaluation
spellingShingle Maarit Tarkiainen
Pirjo Tynjälä
Paula Vähäsalo
Kristiina Aalto
Liisa Kröger
Katariina Rebane
Pekka Lahdenne
Janne Martikainen
Economic evaluation of infliximab, synthetic triple therapy and methotrexate in the treatment of newly diagnosed juvenile idiopathic arthritis
Pediatric Rheumatology Online Journal
Juvenile idiopathic arthritis
Biological therapy
Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs; health economic evaluation
title Economic evaluation of infliximab, synthetic triple therapy and methotrexate in the treatment of newly diagnosed juvenile idiopathic arthritis
title_full Economic evaluation of infliximab, synthetic triple therapy and methotrexate in the treatment of newly diagnosed juvenile idiopathic arthritis
title_fullStr Economic evaluation of infliximab, synthetic triple therapy and methotrexate in the treatment of newly diagnosed juvenile idiopathic arthritis
title_full_unstemmed Economic evaluation of infliximab, synthetic triple therapy and methotrexate in the treatment of newly diagnosed juvenile idiopathic arthritis
title_short Economic evaluation of infliximab, synthetic triple therapy and methotrexate in the treatment of newly diagnosed juvenile idiopathic arthritis
title_sort economic evaluation of infliximab synthetic triple therapy and methotrexate in the treatment of newly diagnosed juvenile idiopathic arthritis
topic Juvenile idiopathic arthritis
Biological therapy
Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs; health economic evaluation
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12969-022-00748-w
work_keys_str_mv AT maarittarkiainen economicevaluationofinfliximabsynthetictripletherapyandmethotrexateinthetreatmentofnewlydiagnosedjuvenileidiopathicarthritis
AT pirjotynjala economicevaluationofinfliximabsynthetictripletherapyandmethotrexateinthetreatmentofnewlydiagnosedjuvenileidiopathicarthritis
AT paulavahasalo economicevaluationofinfliximabsynthetictripletherapyandmethotrexateinthetreatmentofnewlydiagnosedjuvenileidiopathicarthritis
AT kristiinaaalto economicevaluationofinfliximabsynthetictripletherapyandmethotrexateinthetreatmentofnewlydiagnosedjuvenileidiopathicarthritis
AT liisakroger economicevaluationofinfliximabsynthetictripletherapyandmethotrexateinthetreatmentofnewlydiagnosedjuvenileidiopathicarthritis
AT katariinarebane economicevaluationofinfliximabsynthetictripletherapyandmethotrexateinthetreatmentofnewlydiagnosedjuvenileidiopathicarthritis
AT pekkalahdenne economicevaluationofinfliximabsynthetictripletherapyandmethotrexateinthetreatmentofnewlydiagnosedjuvenileidiopathicarthritis
AT jannemartikainen economicevaluationofinfliximabsynthetictripletherapyandmethotrexateinthetreatmentofnewlydiagnosedjuvenileidiopathicarthritis