Psychophysical properties of odour processing can be quantitatively described by relative AP latency patterns in mitral and tufted cells

Electrophysiological and population imaging data in rodents show that olfactory bulb(OB) activity is profoundly modulated by the odour sampling process while behavioralexperiments indicate that odour discrimination can occur within a single sniff. Thispaper addresses the question of whether action p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andreas T. Schaefer, Troy W. Margrie
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2012-05-01
Series:Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnsys.2012.00030/full
_version_ 1818606229237268480
author Andreas T. Schaefer
Andreas T. Schaefer
Andreas T. Schaefer
Troy W. Margrie
Troy W. Margrie
author_facet Andreas T. Schaefer
Andreas T. Schaefer
Andreas T. Schaefer
Troy W. Margrie
Troy W. Margrie
author_sort Andreas T. Schaefer
collection DOAJ
description Electrophysiological and population imaging data in rodents show that olfactory bulb(OB) activity is profoundly modulated by the odour sampling process while behavioralexperiments indicate that odour discrimination can occur within a single sniff. Thispaper addresses the question of whether action potential (AP) latencies occurring acrossthe mitral and tufted cell (M/TC) population within an individual sampling cycle couldaccount for the psychophysical properties of odour processing. To determine this wecreated an OB model (50 000 M/TCs) exhibiting hallmarks of published in vivoproperties and used a template-matching algorithm to assess stimulus separation. Suchan AP latency-based scheme showed high reproducibility and sensitivity such that odourstimuli could be reliably separated independent of concentration. As in behavioralexperiments we found that very dissimilar odours (A vs B) were accurately andrapidly discerned while very similar odours (binary mixtures, 0.4A/0.6B vs 0.6A/0.4B)required up to 90 ms longer. As in lesion studies we find that AP latency-basedrepresentation is rather insensitive to disruption of large regions of the OB. The APlatency-based scheme described here therefore captures both temporal andpsychophysical properties of olfactory processing and suggests that the onset patterns ofM/TC activity in the OB represent stimulus specific features of olfactory stimuli.
first_indexed 2024-12-16T14:07:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-17517468d8bd48218197a9b890e9dd3a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1662-5137
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T14:07:32Z
publishDate 2012-05-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
spelling doaj.art-17517468d8bd48218197a9b890e9dd3a2022-12-21T22:28:52ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience1662-51372012-05-01610.3389/fnsys.2012.0003021736Psychophysical properties of odour processing can be quantitatively described by relative AP latency patterns in mitral and tufted cellsAndreas T. Schaefer0Andreas T. Schaefer1Andreas T. Schaefer2Troy W. Margrie3Troy W. Margrie4University College LondonUniversität HeidelbergMPI for medical researchUniversity College LondonThe National Institute for Medical ResearchElectrophysiological and population imaging data in rodents show that olfactory bulb(OB) activity is profoundly modulated by the odour sampling process while behavioralexperiments indicate that odour discrimination can occur within a single sniff. Thispaper addresses the question of whether action potential (AP) latencies occurring acrossthe mitral and tufted cell (M/TC) population within an individual sampling cycle couldaccount for the psychophysical properties of odour processing. To determine this wecreated an OB model (50 000 M/TCs) exhibiting hallmarks of published in vivoproperties and used a template-matching algorithm to assess stimulus separation. Suchan AP latency-based scheme showed high reproducibility and sensitivity such that odourstimuli could be reliably separated independent of concentration. As in behavioralexperiments we found that very dissimilar odours (A vs B) were accurately andrapidly discerned while very similar odours (binary mixtures, 0.4A/0.6B vs 0.6A/0.4B)required up to 90 ms longer. As in lesion studies we find that AP latency-basedrepresentation is rather insensitive to disruption of large regions of the OB. The APlatency-based scheme described here therefore captures both temporal andpsychophysical properties of olfactory processing and suggests that the onset patterns ofM/TC activity in the OB represent stimulus specific features of olfactory stimuli.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnsys.2012.00030/fullin vivoOlfactionModelbehaviourdiscrimination timeslatency code
spellingShingle Andreas T. Schaefer
Andreas T. Schaefer
Andreas T. Schaefer
Troy W. Margrie
Troy W. Margrie
Psychophysical properties of odour processing can be quantitatively described by relative AP latency patterns in mitral and tufted cells
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
in vivo
Olfaction
Model
behaviour
discrimination times
latency code
title Psychophysical properties of odour processing can be quantitatively described by relative AP latency patterns in mitral and tufted cells
title_full Psychophysical properties of odour processing can be quantitatively described by relative AP latency patterns in mitral and tufted cells
title_fullStr Psychophysical properties of odour processing can be quantitatively described by relative AP latency patterns in mitral and tufted cells
title_full_unstemmed Psychophysical properties of odour processing can be quantitatively described by relative AP latency patterns in mitral and tufted cells
title_short Psychophysical properties of odour processing can be quantitatively described by relative AP latency patterns in mitral and tufted cells
title_sort psychophysical properties of odour processing can be quantitatively described by relative ap latency patterns in mitral and tufted cells
topic in vivo
Olfaction
Model
behaviour
discrimination times
latency code
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnsys.2012.00030/full
work_keys_str_mv AT andreastschaefer psychophysicalpropertiesofodourprocessingcanbequantitativelydescribedbyrelativeaplatencypatternsinmitralandtuftedcells
AT andreastschaefer psychophysicalpropertiesofodourprocessingcanbequantitativelydescribedbyrelativeaplatencypatternsinmitralandtuftedcells
AT andreastschaefer psychophysicalpropertiesofodourprocessingcanbequantitativelydescribedbyrelativeaplatencypatternsinmitralandtuftedcells
AT troywmargrie psychophysicalpropertiesofodourprocessingcanbequantitativelydescribedbyrelativeaplatencypatternsinmitralandtuftedcells
AT troywmargrie psychophysicalpropertiesofodourprocessingcanbequantitativelydescribedbyrelativeaplatencypatternsinmitralandtuftedcells