Dutch women’s intended participation in a risk-based breast cancer screening and prevention programme: a survey study identifying preferences, facilitators and barriers

Abstract Background Risk-based breast cancer screening may improve the benefit-harm ratio of screening by tailoring policy to a woman’s personal breast cancer risk. This study aims to explore Dutch women’s preferences regarding the organisation and implementation of a risk-based breast cancer screen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Linda Rainey, Daniëlle van der Waal, Mireille J. M. Broeders
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-10-01
Series:BMC Cancer
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12885-020-07464-2
_version_ 1818049162057351168
author Linda Rainey
Daniëlle van der Waal
Mireille J. M. Broeders
author_facet Linda Rainey
Daniëlle van der Waal
Mireille J. M. Broeders
author_sort Linda Rainey
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Risk-based breast cancer screening may improve the benefit-harm ratio of screening by tailoring policy to a woman’s personal breast cancer risk. This study aims to explore Dutch women’s preferences regarding the organisation and implementation of a risk-based breast cancer screening and prevention programme, identifying potential barriers and facilitators to uptake. Methods A total of 5110 participants in the Dutch Personalised RISk-based MAmmography screening (PRISMA) study were invited, of whom 942 completed a two-part web-based survey. The first part contained questions about personal characteristics; for the second part, women were randomly assigned to one of four hypothetical breast cancer risk scenarios (i.e. low, average, moderate, or high) with subsequent tailored screening and prevention advice. Descriptive statistics are used to present women’s organisational preferences. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed using seven proxy measures for acceptability of risk-based screening (e.g., interest in risk) and risk-based prevention (e.g., willingness to change diet). Results Interest in breast cancer risk was high (80.3%). Higher assigned risk scenario was most consistently associated with acceptance of tailored screening and prevention recommendations. Increased acceptance of lifestyle changes was additionally associated with higher education. Having a first degree family history of breast cancer decreased women’s motivation to participate in preventative lifestyle measures. Acceptability of medication was associated with a woman’s general beliefs about the (over)use and benefit-harm balance of medication. Conclusions Dutch women generally appear in favour of receiving their breast cancer risk estimate with subsequent tailored screening and prevention recommendations. However, women’s level of acceptance depends on their assigned risk category. Offering tailored screening and prevention recommendations to low-risk women will be most challenging. Educating women on the benefits and harms of all risk-based screening and prevention strategies is key to acceptability and informed decision-making.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T10:33:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-175a7a618a9b4848a41baa5280e1c6fc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2407
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T10:33:11Z
publishDate 2020-10-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Cancer
spelling doaj.art-175a7a618a9b4848a41baa5280e1c6fc2022-12-22T01:52:31ZengBMCBMC Cancer1471-24072020-10-0120111410.1186/s12885-020-07464-2Dutch women’s intended participation in a risk-based breast cancer screening and prevention programme: a survey study identifying preferences, facilitators and barriersLinda Rainey0Daniëlle van der Waal1Mireille J. M. Broeders2Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical CenterRadboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical CenterRadboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical CenterAbstract Background Risk-based breast cancer screening may improve the benefit-harm ratio of screening by tailoring policy to a woman’s personal breast cancer risk. This study aims to explore Dutch women’s preferences regarding the organisation and implementation of a risk-based breast cancer screening and prevention programme, identifying potential barriers and facilitators to uptake. Methods A total of 5110 participants in the Dutch Personalised RISk-based MAmmography screening (PRISMA) study were invited, of whom 942 completed a two-part web-based survey. The first part contained questions about personal characteristics; for the second part, women were randomly assigned to one of four hypothetical breast cancer risk scenarios (i.e. low, average, moderate, or high) with subsequent tailored screening and prevention advice. Descriptive statistics are used to present women’s organisational preferences. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed using seven proxy measures for acceptability of risk-based screening (e.g., interest in risk) and risk-based prevention (e.g., willingness to change diet). Results Interest in breast cancer risk was high (80.3%). Higher assigned risk scenario was most consistently associated with acceptance of tailored screening and prevention recommendations. Increased acceptance of lifestyle changes was additionally associated with higher education. Having a first degree family history of breast cancer decreased women’s motivation to participate in preventative lifestyle measures. Acceptability of medication was associated with a woman’s general beliefs about the (over)use and benefit-harm balance of medication. Conclusions Dutch women generally appear in favour of receiving their breast cancer risk estimate with subsequent tailored screening and prevention recommendations. However, women’s level of acceptance depends on their assigned risk category. Offering tailored screening and prevention recommendations to low-risk women will be most challenging. Educating women on the benefits and harms of all risk-based screening and prevention strategies is key to acceptability and informed decision-making.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12885-020-07464-2Breast cancerRisk assessmentScreeningAcceptabilityPrevention
spellingShingle Linda Rainey
Daniëlle van der Waal
Mireille J. M. Broeders
Dutch women’s intended participation in a risk-based breast cancer screening and prevention programme: a survey study identifying preferences, facilitators and barriers
BMC Cancer
Breast cancer
Risk assessment
Screening
Acceptability
Prevention
title Dutch women’s intended participation in a risk-based breast cancer screening and prevention programme: a survey study identifying preferences, facilitators and barriers
title_full Dutch women’s intended participation in a risk-based breast cancer screening and prevention programme: a survey study identifying preferences, facilitators and barriers
title_fullStr Dutch women’s intended participation in a risk-based breast cancer screening and prevention programme: a survey study identifying preferences, facilitators and barriers
title_full_unstemmed Dutch women’s intended participation in a risk-based breast cancer screening and prevention programme: a survey study identifying preferences, facilitators and barriers
title_short Dutch women’s intended participation in a risk-based breast cancer screening and prevention programme: a survey study identifying preferences, facilitators and barriers
title_sort dutch women s intended participation in a risk based breast cancer screening and prevention programme a survey study identifying preferences facilitators and barriers
topic Breast cancer
Risk assessment
Screening
Acceptability
Prevention
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12885-020-07464-2
work_keys_str_mv AT lindarainey dutchwomensintendedparticipationinariskbasedbreastcancerscreeningandpreventionprogrammeasurveystudyidentifyingpreferencesfacilitatorsandbarriers
AT daniellevanderwaal dutchwomensintendedparticipationinariskbasedbreastcancerscreeningandpreventionprogrammeasurveystudyidentifyingpreferencesfacilitatorsandbarriers
AT mireillejmbroeders dutchwomensintendedparticipationinariskbasedbreastcancerscreeningandpreventionprogrammeasurveystudyidentifyingpreferencesfacilitatorsandbarriers