Randomized Cross-Sectional Study to Compare HIV-1 Specific Antibody and Cytokine Concentrations in Female Genital Secretions Obtained by Menstrual Cup and Cervicovaginal Lavage.

Optimizing methods for genital specimen collection to accurately characterize mucosal immune responses is a priority for the HIV prevention field. The menstrual cup (MC) has been proposed as an alternative to other methods including cervicovaginal lavage (CVL), but no study has yet formally compared...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Derseree Archary, Lenine J Liebenberg, Lise Werner, Sahil Tulsi, Nelisile Majola, Nivashnee Naicker, Sarah Dlamini, Thomas J Hope, Natasha Samsunder, Salim S Abdool Karim, Lynn Morris, Jo-Ann S Passmore, Nigel J Garrett
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2015-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4492781?pdf=render
_version_ 1828352641341587456
author Derseree Archary
Lenine J Liebenberg
Lise Werner
Sahil Tulsi
Nelisile Majola
Nivashnee Naicker
Sarah Dlamini
Thomas J Hope
Natasha Samsunder
Salim S Abdool Karim
Lynn Morris
Jo-Ann S Passmore
Nigel J Garrett
author_facet Derseree Archary
Lenine J Liebenberg
Lise Werner
Sahil Tulsi
Nelisile Majola
Nivashnee Naicker
Sarah Dlamini
Thomas J Hope
Natasha Samsunder
Salim S Abdool Karim
Lynn Morris
Jo-Ann S Passmore
Nigel J Garrett
author_sort Derseree Archary
collection DOAJ
description Optimizing methods for genital specimen collection to accurately characterize mucosal immune responses is a priority for the HIV prevention field. The menstrual cup (MC) has been proposed as an alternative to other methods including cervicovaginal lavage (CVL), but no study has yet formally compared these two methods.Forty HIV-infected, antiretroviral therapy-naïve women from the CAPRISA 002 acute HIV infection cohort study were randomized to have genital fluid collected using the MC with subsequent CVL, or by CVL alone. Qualitative data, which assessed levels of comfort and acceptability of MC using a 5-point Likert scale, was collected. Luminex multiplex assays were used to measure HIV-specific IgG against multiple gene products and 48 cytokines.The majority (94%) of participants indicated that insertion, wearing and removal of the MC was comfortable. Nineteen MCs with 18 matching, subsequent CVLs and 20 randomized CVLs were available for analysis. Mucosal IgG responses against four HIV-antigens were detected in 99% of MCs compared to only 80% of randomized CVLs (p = 0.029). Higher specific antibody activity and total antibodies were observed in MCs compared to CVL (all p<0.001). In MCs, 42/48 (88%) cytokines were in the detectable range in all participants compared to 27/48 (54%) in CVL (p<0.001). Concentrations of 22/41 cytokines (53.7%) were significantly higher in fluid collected by MC. Both total IgG (r = 0.63; p = 0.005) and cytokine concentrations (r = 0.90; p<0.001) correlated strongly between MC and corresponding post-MC CVL.MC sampling improves the detection of mucosal cytokines and antibodies, particularly those present at low concentrations. MC may therefore represent an ideal tool to assess immunological parameters in genital secretions, without interfering with concurrent collection of conventional CVL samples.
first_indexed 2024-04-14T01:55:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1760aafc027a4f1fb7eeffc11f5397d9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-14T01:55:53Z
publishDate 2015-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-1760aafc027a4f1fb7eeffc11f5397d92022-12-22T02:19:03ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-01107e013190610.1371/journal.pone.0131906Randomized Cross-Sectional Study to Compare HIV-1 Specific Antibody and Cytokine Concentrations in Female Genital Secretions Obtained by Menstrual Cup and Cervicovaginal Lavage.Derseree ArcharyLenine J LiebenbergLise WernerSahil TulsiNelisile MajolaNivashnee NaickerSarah DlaminiThomas J HopeNatasha SamsunderSalim S Abdool KarimLynn MorrisJo-Ann S PassmoreNigel J GarrettOptimizing methods for genital specimen collection to accurately characterize mucosal immune responses is a priority for the HIV prevention field. The menstrual cup (MC) has been proposed as an alternative to other methods including cervicovaginal lavage (CVL), but no study has yet formally compared these two methods.Forty HIV-infected, antiretroviral therapy-naïve women from the CAPRISA 002 acute HIV infection cohort study were randomized to have genital fluid collected using the MC with subsequent CVL, or by CVL alone. Qualitative data, which assessed levels of comfort and acceptability of MC using a 5-point Likert scale, was collected. Luminex multiplex assays were used to measure HIV-specific IgG against multiple gene products and 48 cytokines.The majority (94%) of participants indicated that insertion, wearing and removal of the MC was comfortable. Nineteen MCs with 18 matching, subsequent CVLs and 20 randomized CVLs were available for analysis. Mucosal IgG responses against four HIV-antigens were detected in 99% of MCs compared to only 80% of randomized CVLs (p = 0.029). Higher specific antibody activity and total antibodies were observed in MCs compared to CVL (all p<0.001). In MCs, 42/48 (88%) cytokines were in the detectable range in all participants compared to 27/48 (54%) in CVL (p<0.001). Concentrations of 22/41 cytokines (53.7%) were significantly higher in fluid collected by MC. Both total IgG (r = 0.63; p = 0.005) and cytokine concentrations (r = 0.90; p<0.001) correlated strongly between MC and corresponding post-MC CVL.MC sampling improves the detection of mucosal cytokines and antibodies, particularly those present at low concentrations. MC may therefore represent an ideal tool to assess immunological parameters in genital secretions, without interfering with concurrent collection of conventional CVL samples.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4492781?pdf=render
spellingShingle Derseree Archary
Lenine J Liebenberg
Lise Werner
Sahil Tulsi
Nelisile Majola
Nivashnee Naicker
Sarah Dlamini
Thomas J Hope
Natasha Samsunder
Salim S Abdool Karim
Lynn Morris
Jo-Ann S Passmore
Nigel J Garrett
Randomized Cross-Sectional Study to Compare HIV-1 Specific Antibody and Cytokine Concentrations in Female Genital Secretions Obtained by Menstrual Cup and Cervicovaginal Lavage.
PLoS ONE
title Randomized Cross-Sectional Study to Compare HIV-1 Specific Antibody and Cytokine Concentrations in Female Genital Secretions Obtained by Menstrual Cup and Cervicovaginal Lavage.
title_full Randomized Cross-Sectional Study to Compare HIV-1 Specific Antibody and Cytokine Concentrations in Female Genital Secretions Obtained by Menstrual Cup and Cervicovaginal Lavage.
title_fullStr Randomized Cross-Sectional Study to Compare HIV-1 Specific Antibody and Cytokine Concentrations in Female Genital Secretions Obtained by Menstrual Cup and Cervicovaginal Lavage.
title_full_unstemmed Randomized Cross-Sectional Study to Compare HIV-1 Specific Antibody and Cytokine Concentrations in Female Genital Secretions Obtained by Menstrual Cup and Cervicovaginal Lavage.
title_short Randomized Cross-Sectional Study to Compare HIV-1 Specific Antibody and Cytokine Concentrations in Female Genital Secretions Obtained by Menstrual Cup and Cervicovaginal Lavage.
title_sort randomized cross sectional study to compare hiv 1 specific antibody and cytokine concentrations in female genital secretions obtained by menstrual cup and cervicovaginal lavage
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4492781?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT dersereearchary randomizedcrosssectionalstudytocomparehiv1specificantibodyandcytokineconcentrationsinfemalegenitalsecretionsobtainedbymenstrualcupandcervicovaginallavage
AT leninejliebenberg randomizedcrosssectionalstudytocomparehiv1specificantibodyandcytokineconcentrationsinfemalegenitalsecretionsobtainedbymenstrualcupandcervicovaginallavage
AT lisewerner randomizedcrosssectionalstudytocomparehiv1specificantibodyandcytokineconcentrationsinfemalegenitalsecretionsobtainedbymenstrualcupandcervicovaginallavage
AT sahiltulsi randomizedcrosssectionalstudytocomparehiv1specificantibodyandcytokineconcentrationsinfemalegenitalsecretionsobtainedbymenstrualcupandcervicovaginallavage
AT nelisilemajola randomizedcrosssectionalstudytocomparehiv1specificantibodyandcytokineconcentrationsinfemalegenitalsecretionsobtainedbymenstrualcupandcervicovaginallavage
AT nivashneenaicker randomizedcrosssectionalstudytocomparehiv1specificantibodyandcytokineconcentrationsinfemalegenitalsecretionsobtainedbymenstrualcupandcervicovaginallavage
AT sarahdlamini randomizedcrosssectionalstudytocomparehiv1specificantibodyandcytokineconcentrationsinfemalegenitalsecretionsobtainedbymenstrualcupandcervicovaginallavage
AT thomasjhope randomizedcrosssectionalstudytocomparehiv1specificantibodyandcytokineconcentrationsinfemalegenitalsecretionsobtainedbymenstrualcupandcervicovaginallavage
AT natashasamsunder randomizedcrosssectionalstudytocomparehiv1specificantibodyandcytokineconcentrationsinfemalegenitalsecretionsobtainedbymenstrualcupandcervicovaginallavage
AT salimsabdoolkarim randomizedcrosssectionalstudytocomparehiv1specificantibodyandcytokineconcentrationsinfemalegenitalsecretionsobtainedbymenstrualcupandcervicovaginallavage
AT lynnmorris randomizedcrosssectionalstudytocomparehiv1specificantibodyandcytokineconcentrationsinfemalegenitalsecretionsobtainedbymenstrualcupandcervicovaginallavage
AT joannspassmore randomizedcrosssectionalstudytocomparehiv1specificantibodyandcytokineconcentrationsinfemalegenitalsecretionsobtainedbymenstrualcupandcervicovaginallavage
AT nigeljgarrett randomizedcrosssectionalstudytocomparehiv1specificantibodyandcytokineconcentrationsinfemalegenitalsecretionsobtainedbymenstrualcupandcervicovaginallavage