Possibilities of using dairy compounds exposed to different treatments in dairy cow feeding

This study was conducted to investigate the effects of untreated dairy compound feeds; DCF (control) and DCFs subjected to 2% fat (F); 2.5% tannic acid (TA); 2% fat + 2.5% tannic acid (F + TA) on the milk yield and composition. In the study, 4 cows of Jersey breed were used and 4 × 4 Latin square ex...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: B. Z Saricicek
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences 2004-05-01
Series:Czech Journal of Animal Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://cjas.agriculturejournals.cz/artkey/cjs-200405-0005_possibilities-of-using-dairy-compounds-exposed-to-different-treatments-in-dairy-cow-feeding.php
_version_ 1828008621714178048
author B. Z Saricicek
author_facet B. Z Saricicek
author_sort B. Z Saricicek
collection DOAJ
description This study was conducted to investigate the effects of untreated dairy compound feeds; DCF (control) and DCFs subjected to 2% fat (F); 2.5% tannic acid (TA); 2% fat + 2.5% tannic acid (F + TA) on the milk yield and composition. In the study, 4 cows of Jersey breed were used and 4 × 4 Latin square experimental design was applied. Normal milk yield, 4% fat corrected milk yield (FCM), dry matter content of milk, non-fat solids content of milk, CP content of milk, fat content of milk, lactose content of milk, crude ash content of milk, daily DM consumption of cows, feed efficiency according to normal milk yield of cows, feed efficiency according to the FCM of cows were 11.96, 12.14, 10.89 and 11.94 kg/day (P < 0.05); 14.16, 14.50, 13.06 and 13.70 kg/day (P < 0.05); 13.37, 13.34, 13.54 and 13.41% (P > 0.05); 8.12, 8.00, 8.35 and 8.19% (P > 0.05); 3.67, 3.70, 3.87 and 3.63% (P < 0.05); 5.25, 5.34, 5.19 and 5.22% (P > 0.05); 4.97, 4.812, 5.01 and 5.042% (P > 0.05); 0.75, 0.73, 0.74 and 0.73% (P > 0.05); 15.97, 15.84, 15.94 and 15.59 kg/day (P > 0.05); 1.34, 1.31, 1.46 and 1.31 kg feed DM/kg milk (P > 0.05); 1.13, 1.09, 1.22 and 1.14 kg feed DM/kg milk (P > 0.05), respectively. According to the results it can be stated that 2.5TA and 2F treatments had positive effects on FCM milk yield and milk protein yield.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T08:28:00Z
format Article
id doaj.art-176157eca667459e85027408769beb17
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1212-1819
1805-9309
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T08:28:00Z
publishDate 2004-05-01
publisher Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences
record_format Article
series Czech Journal of Animal Science
spelling doaj.art-176157eca667459e85027408769beb172023-02-23T03:32:11ZengCzech Academy of Agricultural SciencesCzech Journal of Animal Science1212-18191805-93092004-05-0149520521010.17221/4301-CJAScjs-200405-0005Possibilities of using dairy compounds exposed to different treatments in dairy cow feedingB. Z Saricicek0Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, TurkeyThis study was conducted to investigate the effects of untreated dairy compound feeds; DCF (control) and DCFs subjected to 2% fat (F); 2.5% tannic acid (TA); 2% fat + 2.5% tannic acid (F + TA) on the milk yield and composition. In the study, 4 cows of Jersey breed were used and 4 × 4 Latin square experimental design was applied. Normal milk yield, 4% fat corrected milk yield (FCM), dry matter content of milk, non-fat solids content of milk, CP content of milk, fat content of milk, lactose content of milk, crude ash content of milk, daily DM consumption of cows, feed efficiency according to normal milk yield of cows, feed efficiency according to the FCM of cows were 11.96, 12.14, 10.89 and 11.94 kg/day (P < 0.05); 14.16, 14.50, 13.06 and 13.70 kg/day (P < 0.05); 13.37, 13.34, 13.54 and 13.41% (P > 0.05); 8.12, 8.00, 8.35 and 8.19% (P > 0.05); 3.67, 3.70, 3.87 and 3.63% (P < 0.05); 5.25, 5.34, 5.19 and 5.22% (P > 0.05); 4.97, 4.812, 5.01 and 5.042% (P > 0.05); 0.75, 0.73, 0.74 and 0.73% (P > 0.05); 15.97, 15.84, 15.94 and 15.59 kg/day (P > 0.05); 1.34, 1.31, 1.46 and 1.31 kg feed DM/kg milk (P > 0.05); 1.13, 1.09, 1.22 and 1.14 kg feed DM/kg milk (P > 0.05), respectively. According to the results it can be stated that 2.5TA and 2F treatments had positive effects on FCM milk yield and milk protein yield.https://cjas.agriculturejournals.cz/artkey/cjs-200405-0005_possibilities-of-using-dairy-compounds-exposed-to-different-treatments-in-dairy-cow-feeding.phpdairy compound feedprotected proteintannic acidin situmilk yieldcomposition
spellingShingle B. Z Saricicek
Possibilities of using dairy compounds exposed to different treatments in dairy cow feeding
Czech Journal of Animal Science
dairy compound feed
protected protein
tannic acid
in situ
milk yield
composition
title Possibilities of using dairy compounds exposed to different treatments in dairy cow feeding
title_full Possibilities of using dairy compounds exposed to different treatments in dairy cow feeding
title_fullStr Possibilities of using dairy compounds exposed to different treatments in dairy cow feeding
title_full_unstemmed Possibilities of using dairy compounds exposed to different treatments in dairy cow feeding
title_short Possibilities of using dairy compounds exposed to different treatments in dairy cow feeding
title_sort possibilities of using dairy compounds exposed to different treatments in dairy cow feeding
topic dairy compound feed
protected protein
tannic acid
in situ
milk yield
composition
url https://cjas.agriculturejournals.cz/artkey/cjs-200405-0005_possibilities-of-using-dairy-compounds-exposed-to-different-treatments-in-dairy-cow-feeding.php
work_keys_str_mv AT bzsaricicek possibilitiesofusingdairycompoundsexposedtodifferenttreatmentsindairycowfeeding