Convergent validity of two decision making style measures
Decision making research has witnessed a growing number of studies on individual differences and decision making styles, yet the lack of comprehensive frameworks and widely accepted measures has hindered research for a long time. There is an ongoing debate on whether individuals’ styles dynamically...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
University Library Heidelberg
2018-04-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Dynamic Decision Making |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/jddm/article/view/43102 |
| _version_ | 1797988872866496512 |
|---|---|
| author | Gentrit Berisha Justina Shiroka Pula Besnik Krasniqi |
| author_facet | Gentrit Berisha Justina Shiroka Pula Besnik Krasniqi |
| author_sort | Gentrit Berisha |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
Decision making research has witnessed a growing number of studies on individual differences and decision making styles, yet the lack of comprehensive frameworks and widely accepted measures has hindered research for a long time. There is an ongoing debate on whether individuals’ styles dynamically change across time and situations according to circumstances. Furthermore, it is an open question whether these styles are mutually exclusive. Decision style measures seek to determine one's dominant style as well as less used styles. To our knowledge this is the first study of the convergent validity of two widely used decision making style measures: The Decision Style Inventory (DSI) and the General Decision Making Style (GDMS). The direction and strength of correlation between directive, analytical, conceptual and behavioral styles as measured by DSI and rational, intuitive, dependent, avoidant and spontaneous styles as measured by GDMS have been tested. Results of the current study are compared with previous studies that have used one or both of the instruments. Correlations between styles are consistent with findings from other studies using one of the decision style measures, but the strength of correlations indicates that there is no convergent validity between DSI and GDMS.
|
| first_indexed | 2024-04-11T08:11:05Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-17b13e76146a4465bc03d8e627023a4d |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2365-8037 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-11T08:11:05Z |
| publishDate | 2018-04-01 |
| publisher | University Library Heidelberg |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Dynamic Decision Making |
| spelling | doaj.art-17b13e76146a4465bc03d8e627023a4d2022-12-22T04:35:21ZengUniversity Library HeidelbergJournal of Dynamic Decision Making2365-80372018-04-014110.11588/jddm.2018.1.4310243102Convergent validity of two decision making style measuresGentrit Berisha0Justina Shiroka Pula1Besnik Krasniqi2University of Prishtina "Hasan Prishtina"University of Prishtina "Hasan Prishtina"University of Prishtina " Hasan Prishtina" and Staffordshire University, UK Decision making research has witnessed a growing number of studies on individual differences and decision making styles, yet the lack of comprehensive frameworks and widely accepted measures has hindered research for a long time. There is an ongoing debate on whether individuals’ styles dynamically change across time and situations according to circumstances. Furthermore, it is an open question whether these styles are mutually exclusive. Decision style measures seek to determine one's dominant style as well as less used styles. To our knowledge this is the first study of the convergent validity of two widely used decision making style measures: The Decision Style Inventory (DSI) and the General Decision Making Style (GDMS). The direction and strength of correlation between directive, analytical, conceptual and behavioral styles as measured by DSI and rational, intuitive, dependent, avoidant and spontaneous styles as measured by GDMS have been tested. Results of the current study are compared with previous studies that have used one or both of the instruments. Correlations between styles are consistent with findings from other studies using one of the decision style measures, but the strength of correlations indicates that there is no convergent validity between DSI and GDMS. https://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/jddm/article/view/43102decision making styleDecision Style InventoryGeneral Decision Making Styleconvergent validity |
| spellingShingle | Gentrit Berisha Justina Shiroka Pula Besnik Krasniqi Convergent validity of two decision making style measures Journal of Dynamic Decision Making decision making style Decision Style Inventory General Decision Making Style convergent validity |
| title | Convergent validity of two decision making style measures |
| title_full | Convergent validity of two decision making style measures |
| title_fullStr | Convergent validity of two decision making style measures |
| title_full_unstemmed | Convergent validity of two decision making style measures |
| title_short | Convergent validity of two decision making style measures |
| title_sort | convergent validity of two decision making style measures |
| topic | decision making style Decision Style Inventory General Decision Making Style convergent validity |
| url | https://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/jddm/article/view/43102 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT gentritberisha convergentvalidityoftwodecisionmakingstylemeasures AT justinashirokapula convergentvalidityoftwodecisionmakingstylemeasures AT besnikkrasniqi convergentvalidityoftwodecisionmakingstylemeasures |