Cost-Effectiveness of Frontline Treatment for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma in the Era of Immunotherapies

Background: Recent randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) improve patient outcomes, but whether these novel agents are cost-effective for untreated advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) remains unclear.Materials and Methods: A microsimulation model was...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: SiNi Li, JianHe Li, LiuBao Peng, YaMin Li, XiaoMin Wan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-09-01
Series:Frontiers in Pharmacology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2021.718014/full
_version_ 1819115025133993984
author SiNi Li
SiNi Li
JianHe Li
LiuBao Peng
YaMin Li
YaMin Li
XiaoMin Wan
author_facet SiNi Li
SiNi Li
JianHe Li
LiuBao Peng
YaMin Li
YaMin Li
XiaoMin Wan
author_sort SiNi Li
collection DOAJ
description Background: Recent randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) improve patient outcomes, but whether these novel agents are cost-effective for untreated advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) remains unclear.Materials and Methods: A microsimulation model was created to project the healthcare costs and outcomes of six strategies (lenvatinib-plus-pembrolizumab, nivolumab-plus-cabozantinib, nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab, pembrolizumab-plus-axitinib, avelumab-plus-axitinib, and sunitinib monotherapy) for patients with aRCC. Transition probability of patients was estimated from CLEAR, CheckMate 9ER, CheckMate 214, KEYNOTE-426, JAVELIN Renal 101, and other data sets by using parametric survival modeling. Lifetime direct medical costs, life years (LYs), quality-adjusted LYs (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were estimated from a United States payer perspective. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed, along with multiple scenario analyses, to evaluate model uncertainty.Results: Of the six competing strategies, nivolumab-plus-cabozantinib yielded the most significant health outcomes, and the sunitinib strategy was the least expensive option. The cost-effective frontier consisted of the nivolumab-plus-cabozantinib, pembrolizumab-plus-axitinib, and sunitinib strategies, which displayed the ordered ICERs of $81282/QALY for pembrolizumab-plus-axitinib vs sunitinib and $453391/QALY for nivolumab-plus-cabozantinib vs pembrolizumab-plus-axitinib. The rest of the strategies, such as lenvatinib-plus-pembrolizumab, nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab, and avelumab-plus-axitinib, were dominated. The cost of sunitinib drove the model most influentially.Conclusions: For aRCC, the pembrolizumab-plus-axitinib strategy is likely to be the most cost-effective alternative at the willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T04:54:38Z
format Article
id doaj.art-17b9a9a2519a459dbca57695bef6ef57
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1663-9812
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T04:54:38Z
publishDate 2021-09-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Pharmacology
spelling doaj.art-17b9a9a2519a459dbca57695bef6ef572022-12-21T18:38:24ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Pharmacology1663-98122021-09-011210.3389/fphar.2021.718014718014Cost-Effectiveness of Frontline Treatment for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma in the Era of ImmunotherapiesSiNi Li0SiNi Li1JianHe Li2LiuBao Peng3YaMin Li4YaMin Li5XiaoMin Wan6Clinical Nursing Teaching and Research Section, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, ChinaThe Xiangya Nursing School, Central South University, Changsha, ChinaDepartment of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, ChinaDepartment of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, ChinaClinical Nursing Teaching and Research Section, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, ChinaThe Xiangya Nursing School, Central South University, Changsha, ChinaDepartment of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, ChinaBackground: Recent randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) improve patient outcomes, but whether these novel agents are cost-effective for untreated advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) remains unclear.Materials and Methods: A microsimulation model was created to project the healthcare costs and outcomes of six strategies (lenvatinib-plus-pembrolizumab, nivolumab-plus-cabozantinib, nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab, pembrolizumab-plus-axitinib, avelumab-plus-axitinib, and sunitinib monotherapy) for patients with aRCC. Transition probability of patients was estimated from CLEAR, CheckMate 9ER, CheckMate 214, KEYNOTE-426, JAVELIN Renal 101, and other data sets by using parametric survival modeling. Lifetime direct medical costs, life years (LYs), quality-adjusted LYs (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were estimated from a United States payer perspective. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed, along with multiple scenario analyses, to evaluate model uncertainty.Results: Of the six competing strategies, nivolumab-plus-cabozantinib yielded the most significant health outcomes, and the sunitinib strategy was the least expensive option. The cost-effective frontier consisted of the nivolumab-plus-cabozantinib, pembrolizumab-plus-axitinib, and sunitinib strategies, which displayed the ordered ICERs of $81282/QALY for pembrolizumab-plus-axitinib vs sunitinib and $453391/QALY for nivolumab-plus-cabozantinib vs pembrolizumab-plus-axitinib. The rest of the strategies, such as lenvatinib-plus-pembrolizumab, nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab, and avelumab-plus-axitinib, were dominated. The cost of sunitinib drove the model most influentially.Conclusions: For aRCC, the pembrolizumab-plus-axitinib strategy is likely to be the most cost-effective alternative at the willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2021.718014/fullcost-effectivenessrenal cell carcinomamicrosimulationimmune checkpoint inhibitorsimmunotherapy
spellingShingle SiNi Li
SiNi Li
JianHe Li
LiuBao Peng
YaMin Li
YaMin Li
XiaoMin Wan
Cost-Effectiveness of Frontline Treatment for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma in the Era of Immunotherapies
Frontiers in Pharmacology
cost-effectiveness
renal cell carcinoma
microsimulation
immune checkpoint inhibitors
immunotherapy
title Cost-Effectiveness of Frontline Treatment for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma in the Era of Immunotherapies
title_full Cost-Effectiveness of Frontline Treatment for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma in the Era of Immunotherapies
title_fullStr Cost-Effectiveness of Frontline Treatment for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma in the Era of Immunotherapies
title_full_unstemmed Cost-Effectiveness of Frontline Treatment for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma in the Era of Immunotherapies
title_short Cost-Effectiveness of Frontline Treatment for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma in the Era of Immunotherapies
title_sort cost effectiveness of frontline treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma in the era of immunotherapies
topic cost-effectiveness
renal cell carcinoma
microsimulation
immune checkpoint inhibitors
immunotherapy
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2021.718014/full
work_keys_str_mv AT sinili costeffectivenessoffrontlinetreatmentforadvancedrenalcellcarcinomaintheeraofimmunotherapies
AT sinili costeffectivenessoffrontlinetreatmentforadvancedrenalcellcarcinomaintheeraofimmunotherapies
AT jianheli costeffectivenessoffrontlinetreatmentforadvancedrenalcellcarcinomaintheeraofimmunotherapies
AT liubaopeng costeffectivenessoffrontlinetreatmentforadvancedrenalcellcarcinomaintheeraofimmunotherapies
AT yaminli costeffectivenessoffrontlinetreatmentforadvancedrenalcellcarcinomaintheeraofimmunotherapies
AT yaminli costeffectivenessoffrontlinetreatmentforadvancedrenalcellcarcinomaintheeraofimmunotherapies
AT xiaominwan costeffectivenessoffrontlinetreatmentforadvancedrenalcellcarcinomaintheeraofimmunotherapies