Destructive verbs with defective paradigms in the Russian language
The subject of this research are verbs with destructive semantics in the Russian language, which are characterized by a paradigmatic defect. Verbs with a destructive meaning form one of the most numerous subgroups within the group of verbs with a paradigmatic defect. The semantic category o...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Institute for the Serbian Language, Belgrade
2023-01-01
|
| Series: | Južnoslovenski Filolog |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0350-185X/2023/0350-185X2301159K.pdf |
| _version_ | 1827871580364996608 |
|---|---|
| author | Krstić Maja R. |
| author_facet | Krstić Maja R. |
| author_sort | Krstić Maja R. |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The subject of this research are verbs with destructive semantics in the
Russian language, which are characterized by a paradigmatic defect. Verbs
with a destructive meaning form one of the most numerous subgroups within
the group of verbs with a paradigmatic defect. The semantic category of
destructiveness, which denotes it in the broadest sense, has not yet
received a comprehensive description in linguistics. A paradigmatic
(systemic) defect is caused by a semantic mismatch between a certain
grammeme and the lexical meaning of the lexeme. The given verbs have a
two-part paradigm, and the impossibillity of using them in the other persons
most often happens due to semantic barriers. They denote an action that is
not related to a person as the doer of the action, but most often represents
processes, states, and phenomena characteristic of the animal or plant
world, etc. А verb of destructiveness denotes an action with the meaning of
“decomposition”, “deterioration”. Within the group of verbs with such
semantics, we distinguished several subgroups: (1) verbs with the meaning of
“spoil”; (2) verbs with the meaning of “disappear”; (3) verbs with the
meaning of destruction, disintegration and (4) verbs with the meaning “to
cause damage”, “to damage”. As the semantics of destructiveness primarily
refers to phenomena or objects, there is almost no need to use other persons
within the paradigm of these verbs. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-12T16:12:11Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-17ba2735d6484a088979c6da45b06d9b |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 0350-185X 2406-0763 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-12T16:12:11Z |
| publishDate | 2023-01-01 |
| publisher | Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Institute for the Serbian Language, Belgrade |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Južnoslovenski Filolog |
| spelling | doaj.art-17ba2735d6484a088979c6da45b06d9b2023-08-09T12:42:27ZengSerbian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Institute for the Serbian Language, BelgradeJužnoslovenski Filolog0350-185X2406-07632023-01-0179115917110.2298/JFI2301159K0350-185X2301159KDestructive verbs with defective paradigms in the Russian languageKrstić Maja R.0University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Philosophy, Department of Slavic StudiesThe subject of this research are verbs with destructive semantics in the Russian language, which are characterized by a paradigmatic defect. Verbs with a destructive meaning form one of the most numerous subgroups within the group of verbs with a paradigmatic defect. The semantic category of destructiveness, which denotes it in the broadest sense, has not yet received a comprehensive description in linguistics. A paradigmatic (systemic) defect is caused by a semantic mismatch between a certain grammeme and the lexical meaning of the lexeme. The given verbs have a two-part paradigm, and the impossibillity of using them in the other persons most often happens due to semantic barriers. They denote an action that is not related to a person as the doer of the action, but most often represents processes, states, and phenomena characteristic of the animal or plant world, etc. А verb of destructiveness denotes an action with the meaning of “decomposition”, “deterioration”. Within the group of verbs with such semantics, we distinguished several subgroups: (1) verbs with the meaning of “spoil”; (2) verbs with the meaning of “disappear”; (3) verbs with the meaning of destruction, disintegration and (4) verbs with the meaning “to cause damage”, “to damage”. As the semantics of destructiveness primarily refers to phenomena or objects, there is almost no need to use other persons within the paradigm of these verbs.https://doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0350-185X/2023/0350-185X2301159K.pdfdestructivenessverbsrussian languageparadigmdefectiveness |
| spellingShingle | Krstić Maja R. Destructive verbs with defective paradigms in the Russian language Južnoslovenski Filolog destructiveness verbs russian language paradigm defectiveness |
| title | Destructive verbs with defective paradigms in the Russian language |
| title_full | Destructive verbs with defective paradigms in the Russian language |
| title_fullStr | Destructive verbs with defective paradigms in the Russian language |
| title_full_unstemmed | Destructive verbs with defective paradigms in the Russian language |
| title_short | Destructive verbs with defective paradigms in the Russian language |
| title_sort | destructive verbs with defective paradigms in the russian language |
| topic | destructiveness verbs russian language paradigm defectiveness |
| url | https://doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0350-185X/2023/0350-185X2301159K.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT krsticmajar destructiveverbswithdefectiveparadigmsintherussianlanguage |