Corona Mortis: A Systematic Review of Literature

Our systematic review evaluates surgically relevant information about corona mortis (CM), such as anatomical structure, size, laterality, incidence, and anthropometric correlations. This study aimed to provide data about anastomosis in an attempt to avoid iatrogenic damage during surgery. Articles w...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Giovana Irikura Cardoso, Lucas Albuquerque Chinelatto, Flavio Hojaij, Flávia Emi Akamatsu, Alfredo Luiz Jacomo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier España 2021-04-01
Series:Clinics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-59322021000100409&tlng=en
_version_ 1818115701794144256
author Giovana Irikura Cardoso
Lucas Albuquerque Chinelatto
Flavio Hojaij
Flávia Emi Akamatsu
Alfredo Luiz Jacomo
author_facet Giovana Irikura Cardoso
Lucas Albuquerque Chinelatto
Flavio Hojaij
Flávia Emi Akamatsu
Alfredo Luiz Jacomo
author_sort Giovana Irikura Cardoso
collection DOAJ
description Our systematic review evaluates surgically relevant information about corona mortis (CM), such as anatomical structure, size, laterality, incidence, and anthropometric correlations. This study aimed to provide data about anastomosis in an attempt to avoid iatrogenic damage during surgery. Articles were searched online using the descriptor “Corona Mortis” in PubMed, Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde (BVS) (Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Saúde [LILACS], MEDLINE, indice bibliografico espaãol en ciencias de la salud [IBECS]), and SciELO database. The time range was set between 1995 and 2020. The articles were selected according to their titles and later the abstracts' relation to our research purpose. All the selected articles were read entirely. A manual search based of the references cited in these articles was also conducted to identify other articles or books of interest. Forty references fulfilled the criteria for this review. The mean incidence of CM was 63% (the majority venous) among 3,107 hemipelvises. The incidence of bilateral CM was lower than that of unilateral variations based on the analysis of 831 pelvises. The mean caliber of the anastomosis was 2.8 mm among 1,608 hemipelvises. There is no consensus concerning the anthropometric influences in CM. Finally, we concluded that CM is not an unusual anatomical variation and that we must not underestimate the risk of encountering the anastomosis during surgery. Anatomical knowledge of CM is, therefore, essential in preventing accidents for surgeons who approach the inguinal and retropubic regions.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T04:10:49Z
format Article
id doaj.art-17caf4cfb9a94427b548ecaab606091b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1980-5322
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T04:10:49Z
publishDate 2021-04-01
publisher Elsevier España
record_format Article
series Clinics
spelling doaj.art-17caf4cfb9a94427b548ecaab606091b2022-12-22T01:21:23ZengElsevier EspañaClinics1980-53222021-04-017610.6061/clinics/2021/e2182Corona Mortis: A Systematic Review of LiteratureGiovana Irikura Cardosohttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6805-2056Lucas Albuquerque Chinelattohttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6534-5075Flavio Hojaijhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0080-022XFlávia Emi Akamatsuhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1088-0075Alfredo Luiz Jacomohttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9546-3873Our systematic review evaluates surgically relevant information about corona mortis (CM), such as anatomical structure, size, laterality, incidence, and anthropometric correlations. This study aimed to provide data about anastomosis in an attempt to avoid iatrogenic damage during surgery. Articles were searched online using the descriptor “Corona Mortis” in PubMed, Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde (BVS) (Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Saúde [LILACS], MEDLINE, indice bibliografico espaãol en ciencias de la salud [IBECS]), and SciELO database. The time range was set between 1995 and 2020. The articles were selected according to their titles and later the abstracts' relation to our research purpose. All the selected articles were read entirely. A manual search based of the references cited in these articles was also conducted to identify other articles or books of interest. Forty references fulfilled the criteria for this review. The mean incidence of CM was 63% (the majority venous) among 3,107 hemipelvises. The incidence of bilateral CM was lower than that of unilateral variations based on the analysis of 831 pelvises. The mean caliber of the anastomosis was 2.8 mm among 1,608 hemipelvises. There is no consensus concerning the anthropometric influences in CM. Finally, we concluded that CM is not an unusual anatomical variation and that we must not underestimate the risk of encountering the anastomosis during surgery. Anatomical knowledge of CM is, therefore, essential in preventing accidents for surgeons who approach the inguinal and retropubic regions.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-59322021000100409&tlng=enCorona MortisSurgeryAnatomicalVariationVascularizationPelvis
spellingShingle Giovana Irikura Cardoso
Lucas Albuquerque Chinelatto
Flavio Hojaij
Flávia Emi Akamatsu
Alfredo Luiz Jacomo
Corona Mortis: A Systematic Review of Literature
Clinics
Corona Mortis
Surgery
Anatomical
Variation
Vascularization
Pelvis
title Corona Mortis: A Systematic Review of Literature
title_full Corona Mortis: A Systematic Review of Literature
title_fullStr Corona Mortis: A Systematic Review of Literature
title_full_unstemmed Corona Mortis: A Systematic Review of Literature
title_short Corona Mortis: A Systematic Review of Literature
title_sort corona mortis a systematic review of literature
topic Corona Mortis
Surgery
Anatomical
Variation
Vascularization
Pelvis
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-59322021000100409&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT giovanairikuracardoso coronamortisasystematicreviewofliterature
AT lucasalbuquerquechinelatto coronamortisasystematicreviewofliterature
AT flaviohojaij coronamortisasystematicreviewofliterature
AT flaviaemiakamatsu coronamortisasystematicreviewofliterature
AT alfredoluizjacomo coronamortisasystematicreviewofliterature