| Summary: | Background. Achievement of the national development goals of the Russian Federation for the period up to 2030 is carried out through the implementation of national projects. The program of strategic academic leadership «Priority 2030», launched as part of the National Project «Science and Universities», will require the introduction of new approaches to managing the personnel of participating universities. The purpose of the work is to develop theoretical and methodological provisions for improving the mechanisms for managing human capital of regional universities of the Volga Federal District participating in the Priority 2030 program. Materials and methods. The implementation of the objectives of the study was achieved on the basis of an analysis of the effectiveness of the mechanisms for managing the human capital of the universities of the district, which received state support only in the form of the basic part of the grant. At the same time, data from the National University Ranking 2019–2023 were used, which reflect the effectiveness of the mechanisms at the start of the Priority 2030 Program. Along with benchmarking analysis, a comparative analysis of university development programs was applied in terms of the content of sections devoted to human capital management. Results. According to the results of the correlation analysis of arrays of scores according to the National University Rankings, most of the studied universities did not reveal a significant relationship between indicators characterizing the impact of staff incentive mechanisms on positions in private ratings that characterize the results of research and innovation activities. An analysis of university development programs for the period up to 2030 showed the dominance of approaches related to the development of professional competencies of scientific and pedagogical workers of universities. Conclusions. It is advisable to expand the capabilities of human capital management mechanisms by covering other categories of employees and expanding the range of competencies that need to be improved. The conducted studies do not pretend to be a complete picture of the entire group of universities included in the Priority 2030 Program, as they cover only a part of its participants. The article is of interest to researchers of the higher education system inthe context of the diversification of mechanisms for increasing the efficiency of activities.
|
|---|