Knowledge, attitude, and practices regarding cervical collars in adult trauma patients amongst practitioners at three hospitals in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa

Background: The use of cervical collars in adult patients with possible injuries to the cervical spine has been an accepted standard of care for many years, despite the absence of evidence for the efficacy of these devices in preventing unwanted movement and harm. Changes to the terminology and reco...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nicole Kissmer, David Morris
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-12-01
Series:African Journal of Emergency Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211419X23000447
_version_ 1797399122188173312
author Nicole Kissmer
David Morris
author_facet Nicole Kissmer
David Morris
author_sort Nicole Kissmer
collection DOAJ
description Background: The use of cervical collars in adult patients with possible injuries to the cervical spine has been an accepted standard of care for many years, despite the absence of evidence for the efficacy of these devices in preventing unwanted movement and harm. Changes to the terminology and recommendations of major trauma guidelines have been made but are limited by low quality evidence. In this context, little is known about what practitioners know, believe, and do, when managing the cervical spine of trauma patients. Methods: In this quantitative, observational, descriptive, cross-sectional survey a specifically designed questionnaire was used to collect data on the knowledge, attitude, and practices of practitioners managing adult trauma patients regarding cervical collars at three hospitals in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Results: A total of 128 completed questionnaires were collected, captured, and analysed. Participants with the additional qualification of ATLS and DipPEC had a mean knowledge score of 8.1 (SD=1.70), compared to those with no additional qualification of 4.5 (SD=1.9) (p<0.001). Participants in the Emergency Department (ED) attained a mean knowledge score of 7.1 (SD=2.2) followed by Surgery (Mean=6, SD=2.0), Orthopaedics (Mean=5.5, SD=1.7) and ICU/Anaesthetics (Mean=4.4, SD=1.8), p<0.001. Head blocks only were most frequently used by 97.4 % of ED, 55.6 % of Surgery, 3.8 % Orthopaedic and 22.2 % ICU/Anaesthetics participants (p<0.001). Conclusion: The knowledge of management principles of cervical spine injuries was influenced by the department in which practitioners worked, the frequency that they managed patients with suspected injuries and additional courses. Head blocks were the most frequently used spinal protection device in all three hospitals. Most participants would be open to a change in practice if new guidelines were recommended. Further research is needed to determine the optimal management of patients with suspected cervical spine injuries and the role of motion restriction devices in limiting movement of the injured spine.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T01:34:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-17d3aca7e9fb44b5a73401c73cd9d539
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2211-419X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T01:34:53Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series African Journal of Emergency Medicine
spelling doaj.art-17d3aca7e9fb44b5a73401c73cd9d5392023-12-09T06:05:50ZengElsevierAfrican Journal of Emergency Medicine2211-419X2023-12-01134241244Knowledge, attitude, and practices regarding cervical collars in adult trauma patients amongst practitioners at three hospitals in KwaZulu-Natal, South AfricaNicole Kissmer0David Morris1Emergency Department, Harry Gwala Regional Hospital, Plessislaer, South Africa; Division of Emergency Medicine, University of KwaZulu Natal, Durban, South Africa; Corresponding author.Emergency Department, Harry Gwala Regional Hospital, Plessislaer, South Africa; Division of Emergency Medicine, University of KwaZulu Natal, Durban, South AfricaBackground: The use of cervical collars in adult patients with possible injuries to the cervical spine has been an accepted standard of care for many years, despite the absence of evidence for the efficacy of these devices in preventing unwanted movement and harm. Changes to the terminology and recommendations of major trauma guidelines have been made but are limited by low quality evidence. In this context, little is known about what practitioners know, believe, and do, when managing the cervical spine of trauma patients. Methods: In this quantitative, observational, descriptive, cross-sectional survey a specifically designed questionnaire was used to collect data on the knowledge, attitude, and practices of practitioners managing adult trauma patients regarding cervical collars at three hospitals in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Results: A total of 128 completed questionnaires were collected, captured, and analysed. Participants with the additional qualification of ATLS and DipPEC had a mean knowledge score of 8.1 (SD=1.70), compared to those with no additional qualification of 4.5 (SD=1.9) (p<0.001). Participants in the Emergency Department (ED) attained a mean knowledge score of 7.1 (SD=2.2) followed by Surgery (Mean=6, SD=2.0), Orthopaedics (Mean=5.5, SD=1.7) and ICU/Anaesthetics (Mean=4.4, SD=1.8), p<0.001. Head blocks only were most frequently used by 97.4 % of ED, 55.6 % of Surgery, 3.8 % Orthopaedic and 22.2 % ICU/Anaesthetics participants (p<0.001). Conclusion: The knowledge of management principles of cervical spine injuries was influenced by the department in which practitioners worked, the frequency that they managed patients with suspected injuries and additional courses. Head blocks were the most frequently used spinal protection device in all three hospitals. Most participants would be open to a change in practice if new guidelines were recommended. Further research is needed to determine the optimal management of patients with suspected cervical spine injuries and the role of motion restriction devices in limiting movement of the injured spine.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211419X23000447TraumaHard collarsCervical spineSpinal immobilisationHead blocks
spellingShingle Nicole Kissmer
David Morris
Knowledge, attitude, and practices regarding cervical collars in adult trauma patients amongst practitioners at three hospitals in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
African Journal of Emergency Medicine
Trauma
Hard collars
Cervical spine
Spinal immobilisation
Head blocks
title Knowledge, attitude, and practices regarding cervical collars in adult trauma patients amongst practitioners at three hospitals in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
title_full Knowledge, attitude, and practices regarding cervical collars in adult trauma patients amongst practitioners at three hospitals in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
title_fullStr Knowledge, attitude, and practices regarding cervical collars in adult trauma patients amongst practitioners at three hospitals in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
title_full_unstemmed Knowledge, attitude, and practices regarding cervical collars in adult trauma patients amongst practitioners at three hospitals in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
title_short Knowledge, attitude, and practices regarding cervical collars in adult trauma patients amongst practitioners at three hospitals in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
title_sort knowledge attitude and practices regarding cervical collars in adult trauma patients amongst practitioners at three hospitals in kwazulu natal south africa
topic Trauma
Hard collars
Cervical spine
Spinal immobilisation
Head blocks
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211419X23000447
work_keys_str_mv AT nicolekissmer knowledgeattitudeandpracticesregardingcervicalcollarsinadulttraumapatientsamongstpractitionersatthreehospitalsinkwazulunatalsouthafrica
AT davidmorris knowledgeattitudeandpracticesregardingcervicalcollarsinadulttraumapatientsamongstpractitionersatthreehospitalsinkwazulunatalsouthafrica