Comparative analysis of assessment methods for operational and anesthetic risks in ulcerative gastroduodenal bleeding
Aim of the investigation: to conduct a comparative analysis of methods of evaluation of surgical and anesthetic risks in ulcerative gastroduodenal bleeding. Materials and methods. A retrospective analysis ofthe extent of the surgical and anesthetic risks and results of treatment of 71 patients with...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Russian |
Published: |
Saratov State Medical University
2015-09-01
|
Series: | Саратовский научно-медицинский журнал |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.ssmj.ru/system/files/2015_03_323-327.pdf |
_version_ | 1819139485759176704 |
---|---|
author | Potakhin S.N. Shapkin Yu.G. Vlasova M.A. Nikitin V.A. |
author_facet | Potakhin S.N. Shapkin Yu.G. Vlasova M.A. Nikitin V.A. |
author_sort | Potakhin S.N. |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Aim of the investigation: to conduct a comparative analysis of methods of evaluation of surgical and anesthetic risks in ulcerative gastroduodenal bleeding. Materials and methods. A retrospective analysis ofthe extent of the surgical and anesthetic risks and results of treatment of 71 patients with peptic ulcer bleeding has been conducted in the study. To evaluate the surgical and anesthetic risks classification trees are used, scale ТА. Rockall and prognosis System of rebleeding (SPRK), proposed by N. V. Lebedev et al. in 2009, enabling to evaluate the probability of a fatal outcome. To compare the efficacy ofthe methods the following indicators are used: sensitivity, specificity and prediction of positive result. Results. The study compared the results ofthe risk assessment emergency operation by using these methods with the outcome ofthe operation. The comparison ofthe prognosis results in sensitivity leads to the conclusion that the scales ТА. Rockall and SPRK are worse than the developed method of classification trees in recognizing patients with poor outcome of surgery. Conclusion. The method of classification trees can be considered as the most accurate method of evaluation of surgical and anesthetic risks in ulcerative gastroduodenal bleeding. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-22T11:23:25Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-17d3bb47c55f481d92f6323c3b02d165 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2076-2518 |
language | Russian |
last_indexed | 2024-12-22T11:23:25Z |
publishDate | 2015-09-01 |
publisher | Saratov State Medical University |
record_format | Article |
series | Саратовский научно-медицинский журнал |
spelling | doaj.art-17d3bb47c55f481d92f6323c3b02d1652022-12-21T18:27:47ZrusSaratov State Medical UniversityСаратовский научно-медицинский журнал2076-25182015-09-011133233274104Comparative analysis of assessment methods for operational and anesthetic risks in ulcerative gastroduodenal bleedingPotakhin S.N.0Shapkin Yu.G.1Vlasova M.A.2Nikitin V.A.3Saratov State Medical UniversitySaratov State Medical UniversitySaratov State Medical UniversitySaratov State Medical UniversityAim of the investigation: to conduct a comparative analysis of methods of evaluation of surgical and anesthetic risks in ulcerative gastroduodenal bleeding. Materials and methods. A retrospective analysis ofthe extent of the surgical and anesthetic risks and results of treatment of 71 patients with peptic ulcer bleeding has been conducted in the study. To evaluate the surgical and anesthetic risks classification trees are used, scale ТА. Rockall and prognosis System of rebleeding (SPRK), proposed by N. V. Lebedev et al. in 2009, enabling to evaluate the probability of a fatal outcome. To compare the efficacy ofthe methods the following indicators are used: sensitivity, specificity and prediction of positive result. Results. The study compared the results ofthe risk assessment emergency operation by using these methods with the outcome ofthe operation. The comparison ofthe prognosis results in sensitivity leads to the conclusion that the scales ТА. Rockall and SPRK are worse than the developed method of classification trees in recognizing patients with poor outcome of surgery. Conclusion. The method of classification trees can be considered as the most accurate method of evaluation of surgical and anesthetic risks in ulcerative gastroduodenal bleeding.http://www.ssmj.ru/system/files/2015_03_323-327.pdfassessment methodscomparative analysisulcerative gastroduodenal bleeding |
spellingShingle | Potakhin S.N. Shapkin Yu.G. Vlasova M.A. Nikitin V.A. Comparative analysis of assessment methods for operational and anesthetic risks in ulcerative gastroduodenal bleeding Саратовский научно-медицинский журнал assessment methods comparative analysis ulcerative gastroduodenal bleeding |
title | Comparative analysis of assessment methods for operational and anesthetic risks in ulcerative gastroduodenal bleeding |
title_full | Comparative analysis of assessment methods for operational and anesthetic risks in ulcerative gastroduodenal bleeding |
title_fullStr | Comparative analysis of assessment methods for operational and anesthetic risks in ulcerative gastroduodenal bleeding |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative analysis of assessment methods for operational and anesthetic risks in ulcerative gastroduodenal bleeding |
title_short | Comparative analysis of assessment methods for operational and anesthetic risks in ulcerative gastroduodenal bleeding |
title_sort | comparative analysis of assessment methods for operational and anesthetic risks in ulcerative gastroduodenal bleeding |
topic | assessment methods comparative analysis ulcerative gastroduodenal bleeding |
url | http://www.ssmj.ru/system/files/2015_03_323-327.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT potakhinsn comparativeanalysisofassessmentmethodsforoperationalandanestheticrisksinulcerativegastroduodenalbleeding AT shapkinyug comparativeanalysisofassessmentmethodsforoperationalandanestheticrisksinulcerativegastroduodenalbleeding AT vlasovama comparativeanalysisofassessmentmethodsforoperationalandanestheticrisksinulcerativegastroduodenalbleeding AT nikitinva comparativeanalysisofassessmentmethodsforoperationalandanestheticrisksinulcerativegastroduodenalbleeding |