An Overview of Systematic Reviews to Inform the Institutional Design of Scientific Advisory Committees
Abstract The current lack of synthesized evidence for informing the design of scientific advisory committees (SACs) is surprising in light of the widespread use of SACs throughout decision‐making processes. While existing research points to the importance of quality, relevance, and legitimacy for SA...
Main Authors: | Asha Behdinan, Elliot Gunn, Prativa Baral, Lathika Sritharan, Patrick Fafard, Steven J. Hoffman |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2018-09-01
|
Series: | Global Challenges |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/gch2.201800019 |
Similar Items
-
Towards a Systematic Understanding of How to Institutionally Design Scientific Advisory Committees: A Conceptual Framework and Introduction to a Special Journal Issue
by: Steven J. Hoffman, et al.
Published: (2018-09-01) -
A Typology of Scientific Advisory Committees
by: Gaëlle M. N. Groux, et al.
Published: (2018-09-01) -
Editorial Committee and Advisory Board in Arabic and English
by: Mohammed zalat
Published: (2019-08-01) -
Editorial Committee and Advisory Board in Arabic and English
by: Mohammed zalat
Published: (2019-08-01) -
What Can Be Learned from Experience with Scientific Advisory Committees in the Field of International Environmental Politics?
by: Steinar Andresen, et al.
Published: (2018-09-01)