Sensitivity and Specificity of Preschool Vision Screening in Iran

Background: To determine the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of the National Vision Screening Program for 7 yr old children in Iran. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, eight cities in Iran were selected through multistage cluster s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hassan HASHEMI, Abbasali YEKTA, Ebrahim JAFARZADEHPUR, Hadi OSTADIMOGHADDAM, Amir ASHARLOUS, Payam NABOVATI, Mehdi KHABAZKHOOB
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2017-02-01
Series:Iranian Journal of Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ijph.tums.ac.ir/index.php/ijph/article/view/9050
_version_ 1811190101882961920
author Hassan HASHEMI
Abbasali YEKTA
Ebrahim JAFARZADEHPUR
Hadi OSTADIMOGHADDAM
Amir ASHARLOUS
Payam NABOVATI
Mehdi KHABAZKHOOB
author_facet Hassan HASHEMI
Abbasali YEKTA
Ebrahim JAFARZADEHPUR
Hadi OSTADIMOGHADDAM
Amir ASHARLOUS
Payam NABOVATI
Mehdi KHABAZKHOOB
author_sort Hassan HASHEMI
collection DOAJ
description Background: To determine the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of the National Vision Screening Program for 7 yr old children in Iran. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, eight cities in Iran were selected through multistage cluster sampling. Selected cities were Sari, Birjand, Ardabil, Mashhad, Bandar Abbas, Dezful, Yazd, and Arak, in Iran in 2013. Totally, 4614 schoolchildren were selected, 4106 of which participated in the study. An optometrist at the school site conducted all vision tests. Results were compared against those recorded on each child’s health card. Those with an uncorrected visual acuity worse than 20/25 in at least one eye screened positive for a vision problem. Results: 8.49% [95% confidence interval, 7.65 to 9.39] of the examinees had a vision problem. The sensitivity rate of the school entry screening was 38.15% (95% CI, 33.01 to 43.50) and the specificity rate was 93.11 (95%CI 92.25 to 93.90). The positive and negative predictive values were 33.93 (29.24 to 38.88) and 94.19 (93.39 to 94.93), respectively. Sensitivity and specificity rates did not significantly differ between boys and girls. For the uncorrected visual acuity tested by public health care workers compared to optometrists, the area under the ROC surface was 0.741 (P<0.001). The best-associated criterion was an uncorrected visual acuity more than 0.05 LogMAR with 67.3% sensitivity and 74.7% specificity. Conclusion: The validity of the school entry vision screening by health workers is low. To reduce false negative rates, some supplementary examinations such as refraction and near visual acuity measurements as well as further training of screeners should be considered.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T14:44:38Z
format Article
id doaj.art-17eeba9309104b8285cb3e16b1c59a93
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2251-6085
2251-6093
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T14:44:38Z
publishDate 2017-02-01
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
record_format Article
series Iranian Journal of Public Health
spelling doaj.art-17eeba9309104b8285cb3e16b1c59a932022-12-22T04:17:40ZengTehran University of Medical SciencesIranian Journal of Public Health2251-60852251-60932017-02-01462Sensitivity and Specificity of Preschool Vision Screening in IranHassan HASHEMI0Abbasali YEKTA1Ebrahim JAFARZADEHPUR2Hadi OSTADIMOGHADDAM3Amir ASHARLOUS4Payam NABOVATI5Mehdi KHABAZKHOOB6Noor Research Center for Ophthalmic Epidemiology, Noor Eye Hospital, Tehran, IranDept. of Optometry, School of Paramedical Sciences, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, IranDept. of Optometry, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran AND Noor Ophthalmology Research Center, Noor Eye Hospital, Tehran, IranRefractive Errors Research Center, School of Paramedical Sciences, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, IranNoor Ophthalmology Research Center, Noor Eye Hospital, Tehran, Iran AND Refractive Errors Research Center, School of Paramedical Sciences, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, IranDept. of Optometry, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran AND Noor Ophthalmology Research Center, Noor Eye Hospital, Tehran, IranDept. of Medical Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IranBackground: To determine the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of the National Vision Screening Program for 7 yr old children in Iran. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, eight cities in Iran were selected through multistage cluster sampling. Selected cities were Sari, Birjand, Ardabil, Mashhad, Bandar Abbas, Dezful, Yazd, and Arak, in Iran in 2013. Totally, 4614 schoolchildren were selected, 4106 of which participated in the study. An optometrist at the school site conducted all vision tests. Results were compared against those recorded on each child’s health card. Those with an uncorrected visual acuity worse than 20/25 in at least one eye screened positive for a vision problem. Results: 8.49% [95% confidence interval, 7.65 to 9.39] of the examinees had a vision problem. The sensitivity rate of the school entry screening was 38.15% (95% CI, 33.01 to 43.50) and the specificity rate was 93.11 (95%CI 92.25 to 93.90). The positive and negative predictive values were 33.93 (29.24 to 38.88) and 94.19 (93.39 to 94.93), respectively. Sensitivity and specificity rates did not significantly differ between boys and girls. For the uncorrected visual acuity tested by public health care workers compared to optometrists, the area under the ROC surface was 0.741 (P<0.001). The best-associated criterion was an uncorrected visual acuity more than 0.05 LogMAR with 67.3% sensitivity and 74.7% specificity. Conclusion: The validity of the school entry vision screening by health workers is low. To reduce false negative rates, some supplementary examinations such as refraction and near visual acuity measurements as well as further training of screeners should be considered.https://ijph.tums.ac.ir/index.php/ijph/article/view/9050Vision screeningAmblyopiaSchoolchildrenSensitivitySpecificityIran
spellingShingle Hassan HASHEMI
Abbasali YEKTA
Ebrahim JAFARZADEHPUR
Hadi OSTADIMOGHADDAM
Amir ASHARLOUS
Payam NABOVATI
Mehdi KHABAZKHOOB
Sensitivity and Specificity of Preschool Vision Screening in Iran
Iranian Journal of Public Health
Vision screening
Amblyopia
Schoolchildren
Sensitivity
Specificity
Iran
title Sensitivity and Specificity of Preschool Vision Screening in Iran
title_full Sensitivity and Specificity of Preschool Vision Screening in Iran
title_fullStr Sensitivity and Specificity of Preschool Vision Screening in Iran
title_full_unstemmed Sensitivity and Specificity of Preschool Vision Screening in Iran
title_short Sensitivity and Specificity of Preschool Vision Screening in Iran
title_sort sensitivity and specificity of preschool vision screening in iran
topic Vision screening
Amblyopia
Schoolchildren
Sensitivity
Specificity
Iran
url https://ijph.tums.ac.ir/index.php/ijph/article/view/9050
work_keys_str_mv AT hassanhashemi sensitivityandspecificityofpreschoolvisionscreeninginiran
AT abbasaliyekta sensitivityandspecificityofpreschoolvisionscreeninginiran
AT ebrahimjafarzadehpur sensitivityandspecificityofpreschoolvisionscreeninginiran
AT hadiostadimoghaddam sensitivityandspecificityofpreschoolvisionscreeninginiran
AT amirasharlous sensitivityandspecificityofpreschoolvisionscreeninginiran
AT payamnabovati sensitivityandspecificityofpreschoolvisionscreeninginiran
AT mehdikhabazkhoob sensitivityandspecificityofpreschoolvisionscreeninginiran