The Types of Argument Structure Used by Hillary Clinton in the CNN Democratic Presidential Debate
This qualitative research was conducted to examine the types of argument structure by Hillary Clinton in part one of the CNN Democratic Presidential Debate since Hillary, who had a great deal of experiences in political parties, was supposed to be able to construct convincing arguments that had good...
Main Authors: | Anggie Angeline, Nani Indrajani T. |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Petra Christian University
2009-01-01
|
Series: | K@ta: A Biannual Publication on the Study of Language and Literature |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://puslit2.petra.ac.id/ejournal/index.php/ing/article/view/17894 |
Similar Items
-
Attributed Favourable Relevance and Argument Evaluation
by: Derek Allen
Published: (1996-01-01) -
Donald Trump’s and Hillary Clinton’s Interruptions In Presidential Debates
by: Zuliati Rohmah, et al.
Published: (2022-05-01) -
Argumentative Statements in The 2016 Presidential Debates Of The U.S: A Critical Discourse Analysis
by: Andini Khoirunisa, et al.
Published: (2022-05-01) -
An Analysis of Logical Fallacy on Prabowo Subianto's Argumentation during 2019 Indonesia Presidential Debate
by: Jaka Satria Warman, et al.
Published: (2020-08-01) -
Argument Pedagogy for Everyday Life
by: Jeffrey P. Mehltretter Drury, et al.
Published: (2019-04-01)