The dual process model of moral judgement
In this article I analyse the dual process model of moral judgement. First, I set out Joshua Greene’s and Jonathan Haidt’s propositions, which represent two schools of thought on this theory. Next, I conduct a number of methodological reviews. On the one hand, I argue that the method used is tautolo...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Spanish |
Published: |
Universidad Pontificia Comillas
2021-11-01
|
Series: | Pensamiento. Revista de Investigación e Información Filosófica |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://revistas.comillas.edu/index.php/pensamiento/article/view/17543 |
_version_ | 1819022561107771392 |
---|---|
author | Pedro Jesús Pérez Zafrilla |
author_facet | Pedro Jesús Pérez Zafrilla |
author_sort | Pedro Jesús Pérez Zafrilla |
collection | DOAJ |
description | In this article I analyse the dual process model of moral judgement. First, I set out Joshua Greene’s and Jonathan Haidt’s propositions, which represent two schools of thought on this theory. Next, I conduct a number of methodological reviews. On the one hand, I argue that the method used is tautological, while on the other, I show that the use of dilemmas is not an adequate tool with which to account for moral deliberation. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-21T04:24:57Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-18003d11803d46d4aa98edef4724f477 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 0031-4749 2386-5822 |
language | Spanish |
last_indexed | 2024-12-21T04:24:57Z |
publishDate | 2021-11-01 |
publisher | Universidad Pontificia Comillas |
record_format | Article |
series | Pensamiento. Revista de Investigación e Información Filosófica |
spelling | doaj.art-18003d11803d46d4aa98edef4724f4772022-12-21T19:16:05ZspaUniversidad Pontificia ComillasPensamiento. Revista de Investigación e Información Filosófica0031-47492386-58222021-11-0177Extra 29551152110.14422/pen.v77.i295.y2021.00617543The dual process model of moral judgementPedro Jesús Pérez Zafrilla0Universitat de ValènciaIn this article I analyse the dual process model of moral judgement. First, I set out Joshua Greene’s and Jonathan Haidt’s propositions, which represent two schools of thought on this theory. Next, I conduct a number of methodological reviews. On the one hand, I argue that the method used is tautological, while on the other, I show that the use of dilemmas is not an adequate tool with which to account for moral deliberation.https://revistas.comillas.edu/index.php/pensamiento/article/view/17543dual process modeljonathan haidtjoshua greenedilemmas |
spellingShingle | Pedro Jesús Pérez Zafrilla The dual process model of moral judgement Pensamiento. Revista de Investigación e Información Filosófica dual process model jonathan haidt joshua greene dilemmas |
title | The dual process model of moral judgement |
title_full | The dual process model of moral judgement |
title_fullStr | The dual process model of moral judgement |
title_full_unstemmed | The dual process model of moral judgement |
title_short | The dual process model of moral judgement |
title_sort | dual process model of moral judgement |
topic | dual process model jonathan haidt joshua greene dilemmas |
url | https://revistas.comillas.edu/index.php/pensamiento/article/view/17543 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pedrojesusperezzafrilla thedualprocessmodelofmoraljudgement AT pedrojesusperezzafrilla dualprocessmodelofmoraljudgement |