The dual process model of moral judgement

In this article I analyse the dual process model of moral judgement. First, I set out Joshua Greene’s and Jonathan Haidt’s propositions, which represent two schools of thought on this theory. Next, I conduct a number of methodological reviews. On the one hand, I argue that the method used is tautolo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Pedro Jesús Pérez Zafrilla
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: Universidad Pontificia Comillas 2021-11-01
Series:Pensamiento. Revista de Investigación e Información Filosófica
Subjects:
Online Access:https://revistas.comillas.edu/index.php/pensamiento/article/view/17543
_version_ 1819022561107771392
author Pedro Jesús Pérez Zafrilla
author_facet Pedro Jesús Pérez Zafrilla
author_sort Pedro Jesús Pérez Zafrilla
collection DOAJ
description In this article I analyse the dual process model of moral judgement. First, I set out Joshua Greene’s and Jonathan Haidt’s propositions, which represent two schools of thought on this theory. Next, I conduct a number of methodological reviews. On the one hand, I argue that the method used is tautological, while on the other, I show that the use of dilemmas is not an adequate tool with which to account for moral deliberation.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T04:24:57Z
format Article
id doaj.art-18003d11803d46d4aa98edef4724f477
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0031-4749
2386-5822
language Spanish
last_indexed 2024-12-21T04:24:57Z
publishDate 2021-11-01
publisher Universidad Pontificia Comillas
record_format Article
series Pensamiento. Revista de Investigación e Información Filosófica
spelling doaj.art-18003d11803d46d4aa98edef4724f4772022-12-21T19:16:05ZspaUniversidad Pontificia ComillasPensamiento. Revista de Investigación e Información Filosófica0031-47492386-58222021-11-0177Extra 29551152110.14422/pen.v77.i295.y2021.00617543The dual process model of moral judgementPedro Jesús Pérez Zafrilla0Universitat de ValènciaIn this article I analyse the dual process model of moral judgement. First, I set out Joshua Greene’s and Jonathan Haidt’s propositions, which represent two schools of thought on this theory. Next, I conduct a number of methodological reviews. On the one hand, I argue that the method used is tautological, while on the other, I show that the use of dilemmas is not an adequate tool with which to account for moral deliberation.https://revistas.comillas.edu/index.php/pensamiento/article/view/17543dual process modeljonathan haidtjoshua greenedilemmas
spellingShingle Pedro Jesús Pérez Zafrilla
The dual process model of moral judgement
Pensamiento. Revista de Investigación e Información Filosófica
dual process model
jonathan haidt
joshua greene
dilemmas
title The dual process model of moral judgement
title_full The dual process model of moral judgement
title_fullStr The dual process model of moral judgement
title_full_unstemmed The dual process model of moral judgement
title_short The dual process model of moral judgement
title_sort dual process model of moral judgement
topic dual process model
jonathan haidt
joshua greene
dilemmas
url https://revistas.comillas.edu/index.php/pensamiento/article/view/17543
work_keys_str_mv AT pedrojesusperezzafrilla thedualprocessmodelofmoraljudgement
AT pedrojesusperezzafrilla dualprocessmodelofmoraljudgement