A psychometric approach to supervisory competency assessment

The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate the possibility of using a psychometric approach for assessing supervisory competencies relevant to the mining and refining environment. The competency questionnaire was developed using supervisory roles and registered supervisory unit standards from...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: A. Vorster, G. Roodt
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AOSIS 2003-10-01
Series:SA Journal of Industrial Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://sajip.co.za/index.php/sajip/article/view/108
_version_ 1818889304294817792
author A. Vorster
G. Roodt
author_facet A. Vorster
G. Roodt
author_sort A. Vorster
collection DOAJ
description The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate the possibility of using a psychometric approach for assessing supervisory competencies relevant to the mining and refining environment. The competency questionnaire was developed using supervisory roles and registered supervisory unit standards from the United Kingdom (UK), as no registered unit standards exist in South Africa. Twenty-four supervisors from three departments (Production, Engineering and Laboratory) were evaluated by 125 raters; besides by themselves, also by their managers, peers, customers and their sub-ordinates. Based on difference scores derived from the Importance and Performance scales, a single factor was extracted with an internal reliability of 0,965. No statistical significant differences were obtained (ANOVA’s, t-test and F-statistics) between groups based on biographical variables or between rater groups. The findings and their implications are further discussed. Opsomming Die primêre doel van die studie was om die moontlikheid vir die gebruik van ’n psigometriese benadering tot toesighouerbevoegdheidsbeoordeling, te evalueer. Die bevoegdheidsvraelys is ontwikkel deur gebruik te maak van toesighouersrolle en geregistreerde toesighouerseenheidstandaarde van die Verenigde Koningkryk, as gevolg van ‘n gebrek aan bestaande eenheidstandaarde in Suid-Afrika. Vier-en-twintig toesighouers van drie departemente (Produksie, Ingenieurswese en Laboratorium) is deur 125 beoordelaars geëvalueer; buiten deur hulself, ook deur hul bestuurders, kollegas, kliënte en hul ondergeskiktes. ’n Enkele faktor, met ’n betroubaarheid van 0,965, gebaseer op die verskiltellings van die Prestasie- en Belangrikheidskaal, is onttrek. Geen beduidende verskille (ANOVA’s, t-toetse en F-statistiek) kon tussen groepe gebaseer op biografiese veranderlikes en die onderskeie beoordelaarsgroepe gevind word nie. Hierdie bevindinge en die implikasies daarvan word verder bespreek.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T17:06:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-18067e877e0c4279a5616d18c48858c2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0258-5200
2071-0763
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T17:06:53Z
publishDate 2003-10-01
publisher AOSIS
record_format Article
series SA Journal of Industrial Psychology
spelling doaj.art-18067e877e0c4279a5616d18c48858c22022-12-21T20:13:08ZengAOSISSA Journal of Industrial Psychology0258-52002071-07632003-10-0129310.4102/sajip.v29i3.108105A psychometric approach to supervisory competency assessmentA. Vorster0G. Roodt1Rand Afrikaans UniversityRand Afrikaans UniversityThe primary purpose of this study was to evaluate the possibility of using a psychometric approach for assessing supervisory competencies relevant to the mining and refining environment. The competency questionnaire was developed using supervisory roles and registered supervisory unit standards from the United Kingdom (UK), as no registered unit standards exist in South Africa. Twenty-four supervisors from three departments (Production, Engineering and Laboratory) were evaluated by 125 raters; besides by themselves, also by their managers, peers, customers and their sub-ordinates. Based on difference scores derived from the Importance and Performance scales, a single factor was extracted with an internal reliability of 0,965. No statistical significant differences were obtained (ANOVA’s, t-test and F-statistics) between groups based on biographical variables or between rater groups. The findings and their implications are further discussed. Opsomming Die primêre doel van die studie was om die moontlikheid vir die gebruik van ’n psigometriese benadering tot toesighouerbevoegdheidsbeoordeling, te evalueer. Die bevoegdheidsvraelys is ontwikkel deur gebruik te maak van toesighouersrolle en geregistreerde toesighouerseenheidstandaarde van die Verenigde Koningkryk, as gevolg van ‘n gebrek aan bestaande eenheidstandaarde in Suid-Afrika. Vier-en-twintig toesighouers van drie departemente (Produksie, Ingenieurswese en Laboratorium) is deur 125 beoordelaars geëvalueer; buiten deur hulself, ook deur hul bestuurders, kollegas, kliënte en hul ondergeskiktes. ’n Enkele faktor, met ’n betroubaarheid van 0,965, gebaseer op die verskiltellings van die Prestasie- en Belangrikheidskaal, is onttrek. Geen beduidende verskille (ANOVA’s, t-toetse en F-statistiek) kon tussen groepe gebaseer op biografiese veranderlikes en die onderskeie beoordelaarsgroepe gevind word nie. Hierdie bevindinge en die implikasies daarvan word verder bespreek.https://sajip.co.za/index.php/sajip/article/view/108Supervisory competency assessment
spellingShingle A. Vorster
G. Roodt
A psychometric approach to supervisory competency assessment
SA Journal of Industrial Psychology
Supervisory competency assessment
title A psychometric approach to supervisory competency assessment
title_full A psychometric approach to supervisory competency assessment
title_fullStr A psychometric approach to supervisory competency assessment
title_full_unstemmed A psychometric approach to supervisory competency assessment
title_short A psychometric approach to supervisory competency assessment
title_sort psychometric approach to supervisory competency assessment
topic Supervisory competency assessment
url https://sajip.co.za/index.php/sajip/article/view/108
work_keys_str_mv AT avorster apsychometricapproachtosupervisorycompetencyassessment
AT groodt apsychometricapproachtosupervisorycompetencyassessment
AT avorster psychometricapproachtosupervisorycompetencyassessment
AT groodt psychometricapproachtosupervisorycompetencyassessment