Unveiling the Pathogenesis of Adenomyosis through Animal Models

Background: Adenomyosis is a common gynecological disorder traditionally viewed as “elusive”. Several excellent review papers have been published fairly recently on its pathogenesis, and several theories have been proposed. However, the falsifiability, explanatory power, and predictivity of these th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xi Wang, Giuseppe Benagiano, Xishi Liu, Sun-Wei Guo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-03-01
Series:Journal of Clinical Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/6/1744
_version_ 1797470432075448320
author Xi Wang
Giuseppe Benagiano
Xishi Liu
Sun-Wei Guo
author_facet Xi Wang
Giuseppe Benagiano
Xishi Liu
Sun-Wei Guo
author_sort Xi Wang
collection DOAJ
description Background: Adenomyosis is a common gynecological disorder traditionally viewed as “elusive”. Several excellent review papers have been published fairly recently on its pathogenesis, and several theories have been proposed. However, the falsifiability, explanatory power, and predictivity of these theories are often overlooked. Since adenomyosis can occur spontaneously in rodents and many other species, the animal models may help us unveil the pathogenesis of adenomyosis. This review critically tallies experimentally induced models published so far, with a particular focus on their relevance to epidemiological findings, their possible mechanisms of action, and their explanatory and predictive power. Methods: PubMed was exhaustively searched using the phrase “adenomyosis and animal model”, “adenomyosis and experimental model”, “adenomyosis and mouse”, and “adenomyosis and rat”, and the resultant papers were retrieved, carefully read, and the resultant information distilled. All the retrieved papers were then reviewed in a narrative manner. Results: Among all published animal models of adenomyosis, the mouse model of adenomyosis induced by endometrial–myometrial interface disruption (EMID) seems to satisfy the requirements of falsifiability and has the predictive capability and also Hill’s causality criteria. Other theories only partially satisfy Hill’s criteria of causality. In particular, animal models of adenomyosis induced by hyperestrogenism, hyperprolactinemia, or long-term exposure to progestogens without much epidemiological documentation and adenomyosis is usually not the exclusive uterine pathology consequent to those induction procedures. Regardless, uterine disruption appears to be a necessary but not sufficient condition for causing adenomyosis. Conclusions: EMID is, however, unlikely the sole cause for adenomyosis. Future studies, including animal studies, are warranted to understand how and why in utero and/or prenatal exposure to elevated levels of estrogen or estrogenic compounds increases the risk of developing adenomyosis in adulthood, to elucidate whether prolactin plays any role in its pathogenesis, and to identify sufficient condition(s) that cause adenomyosis.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T19:36:16Z
format Article
id doaj.art-182474345a9e43b1850a3f3aeacae56f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2077-0383
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T19:36:16Z
publishDate 2022-03-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical Medicine
spelling doaj.art-182474345a9e43b1850a3f3aeacae56f2023-11-24T01:51:52ZengMDPI AGJournal of Clinical Medicine2077-03832022-03-01116174410.3390/jcm11061744Unveiling the Pathogenesis of Adenomyosis through Animal ModelsXi Wang0Giuseppe Benagiano1Xishi Liu2Sun-Wei Guo3Shanghai Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200011, ChinaFaculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Sapienza, University of Rome, 00161 Rome, ItalyShanghai Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200011, ChinaShanghai Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200011, ChinaBackground: Adenomyosis is a common gynecological disorder traditionally viewed as “elusive”. Several excellent review papers have been published fairly recently on its pathogenesis, and several theories have been proposed. However, the falsifiability, explanatory power, and predictivity of these theories are often overlooked. Since adenomyosis can occur spontaneously in rodents and many other species, the animal models may help us unveil the pathogenesis of adenomyosis. This review critically tallies experimentally induced models published so far, with a particular focus on their relevance to epidemiological findings, their possible mechanisms of action, and their explanatory and predictive power. Methods: PubMed was exhaustively searched using the phrase “adenomyosis and animal model”, “adenomyosis and experimental model”, “adenomyosis and mouse”, and “adenomyosis and rat”, and the resultant papers were retrieved, carefully read, and the resultant information distilled. All the retrieved papers were then reviewed in a narrative manner. Results: Among all published animal models of adenomyosis, the mouse model of adenomyosis induced by endometrial–myometrial interface disruption (EMID) seems to satisfy the requirements of falsifiability and has the predictive capability and also Hill’s causality criteria. Other theories only partially satisfy Hill’s criteria of causality. In particular, animal models of adenomyosis induced by hyperestrogenism, hyperprolactinemia, or long-term exposure to progestogens without much epidemiological documentation and adenomyosis is usually not the exclusive uterine pathology consequent to those induction procedures. Regardless, uterine disruption appears to be a necessary but not sufficient condition for causing adenomyosis. Conclusions: EMID is, however, unlikely the sole cause for adenomyosis. Future studies, including animal studies, are warranted to understand how and why in utero and/or prenatal exposure to elevated levels of estrogen or estrogenic compounds increases the risk of developing adenomyosis in adulthood, to elucidate whether prolactin plays any role in its pathogenesis, and to identify sufficient condition(s) that cause adenomyosis.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/6/1744adenomyosisanimal modelsendometrial–myometrial interface disruptionfalsifiabilitypathogenesispredictivity
spellingShingle Xi Wang
Giuseppe Benagiano
Xishi Liu
Sun-Wei Guo
Unveiling the Pathogenesis of Adenomyosis through Animal Models
Journal of Clinical Medicine
adenomyosis
animal models
endometrial–myometrial interface disruption
falsifiability
pathogenesis
predictivity
title Unveiling the Pathogenesis of Adenomyosis through Animal Models
title_full Unveiling the Pathogenesis of Adenomyosis through Animal Models
title_fullStr Unveiling the Pathogenesis of Adenomyosis through Animal Models
title_full_unstemmed Unveiling the Pathogenesis of Adenomyosis through Animal Models
title_short Unveiling the Pathogenesis of Adenomyosis through Animal Models
title_sort unveiling the pathogenesis of adenomyosis through animal models
topic adenomyosis
animal models
endometrial–myometrial interface disruption
falsifiability
pathogenesis
predictivity
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/6/1744
work_keys_str_mv AT xiwang unveilingthepathogenesisofadenomyosisthroughanimalmodels
AT giuseppebenagiano unveilingthepathogenesisofadenomyosisthroughanimalmodels
AT xishiliu unveilingthepathogenesisofadenomyosisthroughanimalmodels
AT sunweiguo unveilingthepathogenesisofadenomyosisthroughanimalmodels