Performance Evaluation of Stormwater Management Systems and Its Impact on Development Costing

The contribution of this paper is a comparison of the installation cost of a conventional drainage system consisting of a network of pits and pipes, with that of a hybrid drainage system comprising a network of pits and pipes, supported by allotment scale infiltration measures in a modern greenfield...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Farjana Akhter, Guna A. Hewa, Faisal Ahammed, Baden Myers, John R. Argue
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-01-01
Series:Water
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/12/2/375
_version_ 1811193018908147712
author Farjana Akhter
Guna A. Hewa
Faisal Ahammed
Baden Myers
John R. Argue
author_facet Farjana Akhter
Guna A. Hewa
Faisal Ahammed
Baden Myers
John R. Argue
author_sort Farjana Akhter
collection DOAJ
description The contribution of this paper is a comparison of the installation cost of a conventional drainage system consisting of a network of pits and pipes, with that of a hybrid drainage system comprising a network of pits and pipes, supported by allotment scale infiltration measures in a modern greenfield residential development. The case study site is located in Pipers Crest, near Strathalbyn, South Australia. This as-built site consists of 56 allotments, 42 pits (hence 42 sub-catchments), one detention basin and over 1000 m of drainage pipes. In this study, conventional and hybrid (combination of conventional and Water Sensitive Urban Design, WSUD systems) drainage systems were designed to convey minor storm events of 10% annual exceedance probability (AEP), and checked for major storm events of 5% AEP, using the DRAINS model and/or source control principles. The installation costs of the conventional and hybrid drainage systems were estimated and compared based upon cost estimates derived from Australian literature. The results of the study indicate that satisfactory drainage was possible using the conventional or hybrid system when the two systems were designed to have outflow not exceeding the pre-developed flow. The hybrid drainage system requires smaller pipe sizes compared to the conventional system. Also, the size of the detention basin and maximum outflow rate of the hybrid system were smaller than those for the conventionally drained site. The installation cost of the hybrid drainage system was 18% less than that of the conventional drainage system when the objective was to accommodate 10% and 5% AEP storms.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T00:01:22Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1825817726964068b53debab7209fee0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2073-4441
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T00:01:22Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Water
spelling doaj.art-1825817726964068b53debab7209fee02022-12-22T03:56:14ZengMDPI AGWater2073-44412020-01-0112237510.3390/w12020375w12020375Performance Evaluation of Stormwater Management Systems and Its Impact on Development CostingFarjana Akhter0Guna A. Hewa1Faisal Ahammed2Baden Myers3John R. Argue4School of Natural and Built Environments, University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes 5095, AustraliaSchool of Natural and Built Environments, University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes 5095, AustraliaSchool of Natural and Built Environments, University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes 5095, AustraliaSchool of Natural and Built Environments, University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes 5095, AustraliaSchool of Natural and Built Environments, University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes 5095, AustraliaThe contribution of this paper is a comparison of the installation cost of a conventional drainage system consisting of a network of pits and pipes, with that of a hybrid drainage system comprising a network of pits and pipes, supported by allotment scale infiltration measures in a modern greenfield residential development. The case study site is located in Pipers Crest, near Strathalbyn, South Australia. This as-built site consists of 56 allotments, 42 pits (hence 42 sub-catchments), one detention basin and over 1000 m of drainage pipes. In this study, conventional and hybrid (combination of conventional and Water Sensitive Urban Design, WSUD systems) drainage systems were designed to convey minor storm events of 10% annual exceedance probability (AEP), and checked for major storm events of 5% AEP, using the DRAINS model and/or source control principles. The installation costs of the conventional and hybrid drainage systems were estimated and compared based upon cost estimates derived from Australian literature. The results of the study indicate that satisfactory drainage was possible using the conventional or hybrid system when the two systems were designed to have outflow not exceeding the pre-developed flow. The hybrid drainage system requires smaller pipe sizes compared to the conventional system. Also, the size of the detention basin and maximum outflow rate of the hybrid system were smaller than those for the conventionally drained site. The installation cost of the hybrid drainage system was 18% less than that of the conventional drainage system when the objective was to accommodate 10% and 5% AEP storms.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/12/2/375urban drainagedrains modelsource controlwsudcosting
spellingShingle Farjana Akhter
Guna A. Hewa
Faisal Ahammed
Baden Myers
John R. Argue
Performance Evaluation of Stormwater Management Systems and Its Impact on Development Costing
Water
urban drainage
drains model
source control
wsud
costing
title Performance Evaluation of Stormwater Management Systems and Its Impact on Development Costing
title_full Performance Evaluation of Stormwater Management Systems and Its Impact on Development Costing
title_fullStr Performance Evaluation of Stormwater Management Systems and Its Impact on Development Costing
title_full_unstemmed Performance Evaluation of Stormwater Management Systems and Its Impact on Development Costing
title_short Performance Evaluation of Stormwater Management Systems and Its Impact on Development Costing
title_sort performance evaluation of stormwater management systems and its impact on development costing
topic urban drainage
drains model
source control
wsud
costing
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/12/2/375
work_keys_str_mv AT farjanaakhter performanceevaluationofstormwatermanagementsystemsanditsimpactondevelopmentcosting
AT gunaahewa performanceevaluationofstormwatermanagementsystemsanditsimpactondevelopmentcosting
AT faisalahammed performanceevaluationofstormwatermanagementsystemsanditsimpactondevelopmentcosting
AT badenmyers performanceevaluationofstormwatermanagementsystemsanditsimpactondevelopmentcosting
AT johnrargue performanceevaluationofstormwatermanagementsystemsanditsimpactondevelopmentcosting