Study protocol for developing, piloting and disseminating the PRISMA-COSMIN guideline: a new reporting guideline for systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments

Abstract Background Systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments are important tools in the evidence-based selection of these instruments. COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments) has developed a comprehensive and widespread guideline to conduct...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ellen B. M. Elsman, Nancy J. Butcher, Lidwine B. Mokkink, Caroline B. Terwee, Andrea Tricco, Joel J. Gagnier, Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi, Carolina Barnett, Maureen Smith, David Moher, Martin Offringa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2022-06-01
Series:Systematic Reviews
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-01994-5
_version_ 1818228263235878912
author Ellen B. M. Elsman
Nancy J. Butcher
Lidwine B. Mokkink
Caroline B. Terwee
Andrea Tricco
Joel J. Gagnier
Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi
Carolina Barnett
Maureen Smith
David Moher
Martin Offringa
author_facet Ellen B. M. Elsman
Nancy J. Butcher
Lidwine B. Mokkink
Caroline B. Terwee
Andrea Tricco
Joel J. Gagnier
Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi
Carolina Barnett
Maureen Smith
David Moher
Martin Offringa
author_sort Ellen B. M. Elsman
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments are important tools in the evidence-based selection of these instruments. COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments) has developed a comprehensive and widespread guideline to conduct systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments, but key information is often missing in published reviews. This hinders the appraisal of the quality of outcome measurement instruments, impacts the decisions of knowledge users regarding their appropriateness, and compromises reproducibility and interpretability of the reviews’ findings. To facilitate sufficient, transparent, and consistent reporting of systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments, an extension of the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting of Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2020 guideline will be developed: the PRISMA-COSMIN guideline. Methods The PRISMA-COSMIN guideline will be developed in accordance with recommendations for reporting guideline development from the EQUATOR (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research) Network. First, a candidate reporting item list will be created through an environmental literature scan and expert consultations. Second, an international Delphi study will be conducted with systematic review authors, biostatisticians, epidemiologists, psychometricians/clinimetricians, reporting guideline developers, journal editors as well as patients, caregivers, and members of the public. Delphi panelists will rate candidate items for inclusion on a 5-point scale, suggest additional candidate items, and give feedback on item wording and comprehensibility. Third, the draft PRISMA-COSMIN guideline and user manual will be iteratively piloted by applying it to systematic reviews in several disease areas to assess its relevance, comprehensiveness, and comprehensibility, along with usability and user satisfaction. Fourth, a consensus meeting will be held to finalize the PRISMA-COSMIN guideline through roundtable discussions and voting. Last, a user manual will be developed and the final PRISMA-COSMIN guideline will be disseminated through publications, conferences, newsletters, and relevant websites. Additionally, relevant journals and organizations will be invited to endorse and implement PRISMA-COSMIN. Throughout the project, evaluations will take place to identify barriers and facilitators of involving patient/public partners and employing a virtual process. Discussion The PRISMA-COSMIN guideline will ensure that the reports of systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments are complete and informative, enhancing their reproducibility, ease of use, and uptake.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T09:59:55Z
format Article
id doaj.art-182da6fd42504be5a5a2df17adf50873
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2046-4053
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T09:59:55Z
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Systematic Reviews
spelling doaj.art-182da6fd42504be5a5a2df17adf508732022-12-22T00:28:01ZengBMCSystematic Reviews2046-40532022-06-0111111310.1186/s13643-022-01994-5Study protocol for developing, piloting and disseminating the PRISMA-COSMIN guideline: a new reporting guideline for systematic reviews of outcome measurement instrumentsEllen B. M. Elsman0Nancy J. Butcher1Lidwine B. Mokkink2Caroline B. Terwee3Andrea Tricco4Joel J. Gagnier5Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi6Carolina Barnett7Maureen Smith8David Moher9Martin Offringa10Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit AmsterdamChild Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children Research InstituteEpidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit AmsterdamEpidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit AmsterdamLi Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s Hospital, Unity Health TorontoDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Schulich School of Medicine and DentistryCentre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of BirminghamDivision of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University Health Network and University of TorontoCochrane Consumer NetworkCentre for Journalology, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research InstituteChild Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children Research InstituteAbstract Background Systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments are important tools in the evidence-based selection of these instruments. COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments) has developed a comprehensive and widespread guideline to conduct systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments, but key information is often missing in published reviews. This hinders the appraisal of the quality of outcome measurement instruments, impacts the decisions of knowledge users regarding their appropriateness, and compromises reproducibility and interpretability of the reviews’ findings. To facilitate sufficient, transparent, and consistent reporting of systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments, an extension of the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting of Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2020 guideline will be developed: the PRISMA-COSMIN guideline. Methods The PRISMA-COSMIN guideline will be developed in accordance with recommendations for reporting guideline development from the EQUATOR (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research) Network. First, a candidate reporting item list will be created through an environmental literature scan and expert consultations. Second, an international Delphi study will be conducted with systematic review authors, biostatisticians, epidemiologists, psychometricians/clinimetricians, reporting guideline developers, journal editors as well as patients, caregivers, and members of the public. Delphi panelists will rate candidate items for inclusion on a 5-point scale, suggest additional candidate items, and give feedback on item wording and comprehensibility. Third, the draft PRISMA-COSMIN guideline and user manual will be iteratively piloted by applying it to systematic reviews in several disease areas to assess its relevance, comprehensiveness, and comprehensibility, along with usability and user satisfaction. Fourth, a consensus meeting will be held to finalize the PRISMA-COSMIN guideline through roundtable discussions and voting. Last, a user manual will be developed and the final PRISMA-COSMIN guideline will be disseminated through publications, conferences, newsletters, and relevant websites. Additionally, relevant journals and organizations will be invited to endorse and implement PRISMA-COSMIN. Throughout the project, evaluations will take place to identify barriers and facilitators of involving patient/public partners and employing a virtual process. Discussion The PRISMA-COSMIN guideline will ensure that the reports of systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments are complete and informative, enhancing their reproducibility, ease of use, and uptake.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-01994-5COSMINPRISMAReporting guidelineDelphi studySystematic reviewConsensus
spellingShingle Ellen B. M. Elsman
Nancy J. Butcher
Lidwine B. Mokkink
Caroline B. Terwee
Andrea Tricco
Joel J. Gagnier
Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi
Carolina Barnett
Maureen Smith
David Moher
Martin Offringa
Study protocol for developing, piloting and disseminating the PRISMA-COSMIN guideline: a new reporting guideline for systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments
Systematic Reviews
COSMIN
PRISMA
Reporting guideline
Delphi study
Systematic review
Consensus
title Study protocol for developing, piloting and disseminating the PRISMA-COSMIN guideline: a new reporting guideline for systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments
title_full Study protocol for developing, piloting and disseminating the PRISMA-COSMIN guideline: a new reporting guideline for systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments
title_fullStr Study protocol for developing, piloting and disseminating the PRISMA-COSMIN guideline: a new reporting guideline for systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments
title_full_unstemmed Study protocol for developing, piloting and disseminating the PRISMA-COSMIN guideline: a new reporting guideline for systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments
title_short Study protocol for developing, piloting and disseminating the PRISMA-COSMIN guideline: a new reporting guideline for systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments
title_sort study protocol for developing piloting and disseminating the prisma cosmin guideline a new reporting guideline for systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments
topic COSMIN
PRISMA
Reporting guideline
Delphi study
Systematic review
Consensus
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-01994-5
work_keys_str_mv AT ellenbmelsman studyprotocolfordevelopingpilotinganddisseminatingtheprismacosminguidelineanewreportingguidelineforsystematicreviewsofoutcomemeasurementinstruments
AT nancyjbutcher studyprotocolfordevelopingpilotinganddisseminatingtheprismacosminguidelineanewreportingguidelineforsystematicreviewsofoutcomemeasurementinstruments
AT lidwinebmokkink studyprotocolfordevelopingpilotinganddisseminatingtheprismacosminguidelineanewreportingguidelineforsystematicreviewsofoutcomemeasurementinstruments
AT carolinebterwee studyprotocolfordevelopingpilotinganddisseminatingtheprismacosminguidelineanewreportingguidelineforsystematicreviewsofoutcomemeasurementinstruments
AT andreatricco studyprotocolfordevelopingpilotinganddisseminatingtheprismacosminguidelineanewreportingguidelineforsystematicreviewsofoutcomemeasurementinstruments
AT joeljgagnier studyprotocolfordevelopingpilotinganddisseminatingtheprismacosminguidelineanewreportingguidelineforsystematicreviewsofoutcomemeasurementinstruments
AT olalekanleeaiyegbusi studyprotocolfordevelopingpilotinganddisseminatingtheprismacosminguidelineanewreportingguidelineforsystematicreviewsofoutcomemeasurementinstruments
AT carolinabarnett studyprotocolfordevelopingpilotinganddisseminatingtheprismacosminguidelineanewreportingguidelineforsystematicreviewsofoutcomemeasurementinstruments
AT maureensmith studyprotocolfordevelopingpilotinganddisseminatingtheprismacosminguidelineanewreportingguidelineforsystematicreviewsofoutcomemeasurementinstruments
AT davidmoher studyprotocolfordevelopingpilotinganddisseminatingtheprismacosminguidelineanewreportingguidelineforsystematicreviewsofoutcomemeasurementinstruments
AT martinoffringa studyprotocolfordevelopingpilotinganddisseminatingtheprismacosminguidelineanewreportingguidelineforsystematicreviewsofoutcomemeasurementinstruments