Study protocol for developing, piloting and disseminating the PRISMA-COSMIN guideline: a new reporting guideline for systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments
Abstract Background Systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments are important tools in the evidence-based selection of these instruments. COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments) has developed a comprehensive and widespread guideline to conduct...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2022-06-01
|
Series: | Systematic Reviews |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-01994-5 |
_version_ | 1818228263235878912 |
---|---|
author | Ellen B. M. Elsman Nancy J. Butcher Lidwine B. Mokkink Caroline B. Terwee Andrea Tricco Joel J. Gagnier Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi Carolina Barnett Maureen Smith David Moher Martin Offringa |
author_facet | Ellen B. M. Elsman Nancy J. Butcher Lidwine B. Mokkink Caroline B. Terwee Andrea Tricco Joel J. Gagnier Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi Carolina Barnett Maureen Smith David Moher Martin Offringa |
author_sort | Ellen B. M. Elsman |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Background Systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments are important tools in the evidence-based selection of these instruments. COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments) has developed a comprehensive and widespread guideline to conduct systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments, but key information is often missing in published reviews. This hinders the appraisal of the quality of outcome measurement instruments, impacts the decisions of knowledge users regarding their appropriateness, and compromises reproducibility and interpretability of the reviews’ findings. To facilitate sufficient, transparent, and consistent reporting of systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments, an extension of the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting of Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2020 guideline will be developed: the PRISMA-COSMIN guideline. Methods The PRISMA-COSMIN guideline will be developed in accordance with recommendations for reporting guideline development from the EQUATOR (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research) Network. First, a candidate reporting item list will be created through an environmental literature scan and expert consultations. Second, an international Delphi study will be conducted with systematic review authors, biostatisticians, epidemiologists, psychometricians/clinimetricians, reporting guideline developers, journal editors as well as patients, caregivers, and members of the public. Delphi panelists will rate candidate items for inclusion on a 5-point scale, suggest additional candidate items, and give feedback on item wording and comprehensibility. Third, the draft PRISMA-COSMIN guideline and user manual will be iteratively piloted by applying it to systematic reviews in several disease areas to assess its relevance, comprehensiveness, and comprehensibility, along with usability and user satisfaction. Fourth, a consensus meeting will be held to finalize the PRISMA-COSMIN guideline through roundtable discussions and voting. Last, a user manual will be developed and the final PRISMA-COSMIN guideline will be disseminated through publications, conferences, newsletters, and relevant websites. Additionally, relevant journals and organizations will be invited to endorse and implement PRISMA-COSMIN. Throughout the project, evaluations will take place to identify barriers and facilitators of involving patient/public partners and employing a virtual process. Discussion The PRISMA-COSMIN guideline will ensure that the reports of systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments are complete and informative, enhancing their reproducibility, ease of use, and uptake. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-12T09:59:55Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-182da6fd42504be5a5a2df17adf50873 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2046-4053 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-12T09:59:55Z |
publishDate | 2022-06-01 |
publisher | BMC |
record_format | Article |
series | Systematic Reviews |
spelling | doaj.art-182da6fd42504be5a5a2df17adf508732022-12-22T00:28:01ZengBMCSystematic Reviews2046-40532022-06-0111111310.1186/s13643-022-01994-5Study protocol for developing, piloting and disseminating the PRISMA-COSMIN guideline: a new reporting guideline for systematic reviews of outcome measurement instrumentsEllen B. M. Elsman0Nancy J. Butcher1Lidwine B. Mokkink2Caroline B. Terwee3Andrea Tricco4Joel J. Gagnier5Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi6Carolina Barnett7Maureen Smith8David Moher9Martin Offringa10Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit AmsterdamChild Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children Research InstituteEpidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit AmsterdamEpidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit AmsterdamLi Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s Hospital, Unity Health TorontoDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Schulich School of Medicine and DentistryCentre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of BirminghamDivision of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University Health Network and University of TorontoCochrane Consumer NetworkCentre for Journalology, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research InstituteChild Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children Research InstituteAbstract Background Systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments are important tools in the evidence-based selection of these instruments. COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments) has developed a comprehensive and widespread guideline to conduct systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments, but key information is often missing in published reviews. This hinders the appraisal of the quality of outcome measurement instruments, impacts the decisions of knowledge users regarding their appropriateness, and compromises reproducibility and interpretability of the reviews’ findings. To facilitate sufficient, transparent, and consistent reporting of systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments, an extension of the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting of Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2020 guideline will be developed: the PRISMA-COSMIN guideline. Methods The PRISMA-COSMIN guideline will be developed in accordance with recommendations for reporting guideline development from the EQUATOR (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research) Network. First, a candidate reporting item list will be created through an environmental literature scan and expert consultations. Second, an international Delphi study will be conducted with systematic review authors, biostatisticians, epidemiologists, psychometricians/clinimetricians, reporting guideline developers, journal editors as well as patients, caregivers, and members of the public. Delphi panelists will rate candidate items for inclusion on a 5-point scale, suggest additional candidate items, and give feedback on item wording and comprehensibility. Third, the draft PRISMA-COSMIN guideline and user manual will be iteratively piloted by applying it to systematic reviews in several disease areas to assess its relevance, comprehensiveness, and comprehensibility, along with usability and user satisfaction. Fourth, a consensus meeting will be held to finalize the PRISMA-COSMIN guideline through roundtable discussions and voting. Last, a user manual will be developed and the final PRISMA-COSMIN guideline will be disseminated through publications, conferences, newsletters, and relevant websites. Additionally, relevant journals and organizations will be invited to endorse and implement PRISMA-COSMIN. Throughout the project, evaluations will take place to identify barriers and facilitators of involving patient/public partners and employing a virtual process. Discussion The PRISMA-COSMIN guideline will ensure that the reports of systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments are complete and informative, enhancing their reproducibility, ease of use, and uptake.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-01994-5COSMINPRISMAReporting guidelineDelphi studySystematic reviewConsensus |
spellingShingle | Ellen B. M. Elsman Nancy J. Butcher Lidwine B. Mokkink Caroline B. Terwee Andrea Tricco Joel J. Gagnier Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi Carolina Barnett Maureen Smith David Moher Martin Offringa Study protocol for developing, piloting and disseminating the PRISMA-COSMIN guideline: a new reporting guideline for systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments Systematic Reviews COSMIN PRISMA Reporting guideline Delphi study Systematic review Consensus |
title | Study protocol for developing, piloting and disseminating the PRISMA-COSMIN guideline: a new reporting guideline for systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments |
title_full | Study protocol for developing, piloting and disseminating the PRISMA-COSMIN guideline: a new reporting guideline for systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments |
title_fullStr | Study protocol for developing, piloting and disseminating the PRISMA-COSMIN guideline: a new reporting guideline for systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments |
title_full_unstemmed | Study protocol for developing, piloting and disseminating the PRISMA-COSMIN guideline: a new reporting guideline for systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments |
title_short | Study protocol for developing, piloting and disseminating the PRISMA-COSMIN guideline: a new reporting guideline for systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments |
title_sort | study protocol for developing piloting and disseminating the prisma cosmin guideline a new reporting guideline for systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments |
topic | COSMIN PRISMA Reporting guideline Delphi study Systematic review Consensus |
url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-01994-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ellenbmelsman studyprotocolfordevelopingpilotinganddisseminatingtheprismacosminguidelineanewreportingguidelineforsystematicreviewsofoutcomemeasurementinstruments AT nancyjbutcher studyprotocolfordevelopingpilotinganddisseminatingtheprismacosminguidelineanewreportingguidelineforsystematicreviewsofoutcomemeasurementinstruments AT lidwinebmokkink studyprotocolfordevelopingpilotinganddisseminatingtheprismacosminguidelineanewreportingguidelineforsystematicreviewsofoutcomemeasurementinstruments AT carolinebterwee studyprotocolfordevelopingpilotinganddisseminatingtheprismacosminguidelineanewreportingguidelineforsystematicreviewsofoutcomemeasurementinstruments AT andreatricco studyprotocolfordevelopingpilotinganddisseminatingtheprismacosminguidelineanewreportingguidelineforsystematicreviewsofoutcomemeasurementinstruments AT joeljgagnier studyprotocolfordevelopingpilotinganddisseminatingtheprismacosminguidelineanewreportingguidelineforsystematicreviewsofoutcomemeasurementinstruments AT olalekanleeaiyegbusi studyprotocolfordevelopingpilotinganddisseminatingtheprismacosminguidelineanewreportingguidelineforsystematicreviewsofoutcomemeasurementinstruments AT carolinabarnett studyprotocolfordevelopingpilotinganddisseminatingtheprismacosminguidelineanewreportingguidelineforsystematicreviewsofoutcomemeasurementinstruments AT maureensmith studyprotocolfordevelopingpilotinganddisseminatingtheprismacosminguidelineanewreportingguidelineforsystematicreviewsofoutcomemeasurementinstruments AT davidmoher studyprotocolfordevelopingpilotinganddisseminatingtheprismacosminguidelineanewreportingguidelineforsystematicreviewsofoutcomemeasurementinstruments AT martinoffringa studyprotocolfordevelopingpilotinganddisseminatingtheprismacosminguidelineanewreportingguidelineforsystematicreviewsofoutcomemeasurementinstruments |