Contemporary Risk Stratification of Acute Coronary Syndrome

Chest pain is one of the most common presenting concerns of patients seeking care in the emergency department, and the underlying etiology can range from acute coronary syndrome to various other non-cardiac causes. Initial evaluation should focus on characterizing symptoms and identifying risk facto...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gurleen Kaur, Swati Chand, Devesh Rai, Bipul Baibhav, Ron Blankstein, Debabrata Mukherjee, Phillip Levy, Martha Gulati
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Radcliffe Medical Media 2022-10-01
Series:US Cardiology Review
Online Access:https://www.uscjournal.com/articleindex/usc.2022.10
_version_ 1797199964165636096
author Gurleen Kaur
Swati Chand
Devesh Rai
Bipul Baibhav
Ron Blankstein
Debabrata Mukherjee
Phillip Levy
Martha Gulati
author_facet Gurleen Kaur
Swati Chand
Devesh Rai
Bipul Baibhav
Ron Blankstein
Debabrata Mukherjee
Phillip Levy
Martha Gulati
author_sort Gurleen Kaur
collection DOAJ
description Chest pain is one of the most common presenting concerns of patients seeking care in the emergency department, and the underlying etiology can range from acute coronary syndrome to various other non-cardiac causes. Initial evaluation should focus on characterizing symptoms and identifying risk factors, but further risk stratification using clinical decision pathways and biomarkers (cardiac troponin) is essential. The 2021 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology guidelines for the evaluation and diagnosis of chest pain represent the first ever guidelines for the evaluation of patients with acute chest pain. The contemporary risk stratification methods described in these guidelines allow for the identification of patient subgroups: patients who do not require further testing, patients who should proceed directly to the cath lab, and patients who will benefit from further anatomic or functional testing. In this review, we describe contemporary risk stratification methods for acute coronary syndrome and summarize the recommendations put forth by the guidelines.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T17:39:40Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1830aeef15dd4ada80dab552f12c5037
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1758-3896
1758-390X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T07:24:07Z
publishDate 2022-10-01
publisher Radcliffe Medical Media
record_format Article
series US Cardiology Review
spelling doaj.art-1830aeef15dd4ada80dab552f12c50372024-04-20T16:03:03ZengRadcliffe Medical MediaUS Cardiology Review1758-38961758-390X2022-10-011610.15420/usc.2022.10Contemporary Risk Stratification of Acute Coronary SyndromeGurleen Kaur0Swati Chand1Devesh Rai2Bipul Baibhav3Ron Blankstein4Debabrata Mukherjee5Phillip Levy6Martha Gulati7Department of Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MADepartment of Internal Medicine, Rochester General Hospital, Rochester, NYDepartment of Cardiology, Sands-Constellation Heart Institute, Rochester Regional Health, Rochester, NYDepartment of Cardiology, Sands-Constellation Heart Institute, Rochester Regional Health, Rochester, NYCardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MADivision of Cardiovascular Diseases, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center at El Paso, El Paso, TXDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, MIDepartment of Cardiology, Barbra Streisand Women’s Heart Center, Cedars-Sinai Smidt Heart Institute, Los Angeles, CAChest pain is one of the most common presenting concerns of patients seeking care in the emergency department, and the underlying etiology can range from acute coronary syndrome to various other non-cardiac causes. Initial evaluation should focus on characterizing symptoms and identifying risk factors, but further risk stratification using clinical decision pathways and biomarkers (cardiac troponin) is essential. The 2021 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology guidelines for the evaluation and diagnosis of chest pain represent the first ever guidelines for the evaluation of patients with acute chest pain. The contemporary risk stratification methods described in these guidelines allow for the identification of patient subgroups: patients who do not require further testing, patients who should proceed directly to the cath lab, and patients who will benefit from further anatomic or functional testing. In this review, we describe contemporary risk stratification methods for acute coronary syndrome and summarize the recommendations put forth by the guidelines.https://www.uscjournal.com/articleindex/usc.2022.10
spellingShingle Gurleen Kaur
Swati Chand
Devesh Rai
Bipul Baibhav
Ron Blankstein
Debabrata Mukherjee
Phillip Levy
Martha Gulati
Contemporary Risk Stratification of Acute Coronary Syndrome
US Cardiology Review
title Contemporary Risk Stratification of Acute Coronary Syndrome
title_full Contemporary Risk Stratification of Acute Coronary Syndrome
title_fullStr Contemporary Risk Stratification of Acute Coronary Syndrome
title_full_unstemmed Contemporary Risk Stratification of Acute Coronary Syndrome
title_short Contemporary Risk Stratification of Acute Coronary Syndrome
title_sort contemporary risk stratification of acute coronary syndrome
url https://www.uscjournal.com/articleindex/usc.2022.10
work_keys_str_mv AT gurleenkaur contemporaryriskstratificationofacutecoronarysyndrome
AT swatichand contemporaryriskstratificationofacutecoronarysyndrome
AT deveshrai contemporaryriskstratificationofacutecoronarysyndrome
AT bipulbaibhav contemporaryriskstratificationofacutecoronarysyndrome
AT ronblankstein contemporaryriskstratificationofacutecoronarysyndrome
AT debabratamukherjee contemporaryriskstratificationofacutecoronarysyndrome
AT philliplevy contemporaryriskstratificationofacutecoronarysyndrome
AT marthagulati contemporaryriskstratificationofacutecoronarysyndrome