Exploiting moral wiggle room: Illusory preference for fairness? A comment

We designed an experiment to test the robustness of Dana, Weber, and Kuang’s (DWK), 2007 results. DWK observed that, when participants were given a “costless” way — the click of a button — to ignore the consequences of their actions on others’ payoffs, they chose to remain ignorant and fair behavior...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tara Larson, C. Monica Capra
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2009-10-01
Series:Judgment and Decision Making
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1930297500004009/type/journal_article
_version_ 1797701715453018112
author Tara Larson
C. Monica Capra
author_facet Tara Larson
C. Monica Capra
author_sort Tara Larson
collection DOAJ
description We designed an experiment to test the robustness of Dana, Weber, and Kuang’s (DWK), 2007 results. DWK observed that, when participants were given a “costless” way — the click of a button — to ignore the consequences of their actions on others’ payoffs, they chose to remain ignorant and fair behavior diminished. By implementing a double-blind experiment together with a design that controls for alternative explanations for the observed behavior, we confirmed DWK’s findings.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T04:39:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1839cfe1df554f4e96036fa8af9af799
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1930-2975
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T04:39:43Z
publishDate 2009-10-01
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series Judgment and Decision Making
spelling doaj.art-1839cfe1df554f4e96036fa8af9af7992023-09-03T09:45:43ZengCambridge University PressJudgment and Decision Making1930-29752009-10-01446747410.1017/S1930297500004009Exploiting moral wiggle room: Illusory preference for fairness? A commentTara Larson0C. Monica Capra1University of Texas at DallasEmory UniversityWe designed an experiment to test the robustness of Dana, Weber, and Kuang’s (DWK), 2007 results. DWK observed that, when participants were given a “costless” way — the click of a button — to ignore the consequences of their actions on others’ payoffs, they chose to remain ignorant and fair behavior diminished. By implementing a double-blind experiment together with a design that controls for alternative explanations for the observed behavior, we confirmed DWK’s findings.https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1930297500004009/type/journal_articledictator gamesexperimentsfairnessstrategic ignorance
spellingShingle Tara Larson
C. Monica Capra
Exploiting moral wiggle room: Illusory preference for fairness? A comment
Judgment and Decision Making
dictator games
experiments
fairness
strategic ignorance
title Exploiting moral wiggle room: Illusory preference for fairness? A comment
title_full Exploiting moral wiggle room: Illusory preference for fairness? A comment
title_fullStr Exploiting moral wiggle room: Illusory preference for fairness? A comment
title_full_unstemmed Exploiting moral wiggle room: Illusory preference for fairness? A comment
title_short Exploiting moral wiggle room: Illusory preference for fairness? A comment
title_sort exploiting moral wiggle room illusory preference for fairness a comment
topic dictator games
experiments
fairness
strategic ignorance
url https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1930297500004009/type/journal_article
work_keys_str_mv AT taralarson exploitingmoralwiggleroomillusorypreferenceforfairnessacomment
AT cmonicacapra exploitingmoralwiggleroomillusorypreferenceforfairnessacomment