A Systematic Review of Current Strategies and Methods for BIM Implementation in the Academic Field
Since the international governmental institutions required and/or recommended (according to the regulations of each country and continent) all public works to be certified in the BIM (Building Information Modeling) methodology, public and private institutions and universities have sought to integrat...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-06-01
|
| Series: | Applied Sciences |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/12/5530 |
| _version_ | 1797530097502126080 |
|---|---|
| author | Alia Besné Miguel Ángel Pérez Silvia Necchi Enric Peña David Fonseca Isidro Navarro Ernesto Redondo |
| author_facet | Alia Besné Miguel Ángel Pérez Silvia Necchi Enric Peña David Fonseca Isidro Navarro Ernesto Redondo |
| author_sort | Alia Besné |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Since the international governmental institutions required and/or recommended (according to the regulations of each country and continent) all public works to be certified in the BIM (Building Information Modeling) methodology, public and private institutions and universities have sought to integrate BIM into their production and educational processes. This requires the university academic environment to focus its efforts on training students in this methodology, as they will need to apply it in any future work activities related to architecture and construction. This article seeks to analyze which methods are being used by higher education institutions around the world to integrate BIM implementation in AEC (architecture, engineering, and construction) degrees and to determine if a set of regulatory guidelines exists that could serve as a common foundation for institutions to improve this integration process. To this end, a systematic literature review was carried out on WOS and SCOPUS by applying the PRISMA statement methodology. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were selected based on keywords, abstracts, and full content of the articles. In the end, 23 articles were thoroughly studied, the integration and evaluation methods analyzed, and results obtained. The analysis shows a consensus on the need to develop common academic guidelines across university centers that define a strategy for curriculum modifications and teaching and learning strategies. Finally, future lines of research are identified. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-10T10:24:06Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-1848741589b24417bef01b09285bc3ff |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2076-3417 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-10T10:24:06Z |
| publishDate | 2021-06-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Applied Sciences |
| spelling | doaj.art-1848741589b24417bef01b09285bc3ff2023-11-22T00:09:42ZengMDPI AGApplied Sciences2076-34172021-06-011112553010.3390/app11125530A Systematic Review of Current Strategies and Methods for BIM Implementation in the Academic FieldAlia Besné0Miguel Ángel Pérez1Silvia Necchi2Enric Peña3David Fonseca4Isidro Navarro5Ernesto Redondo6Architecture Department, Ramon Llull University, La Salle, GRETEL, 08022 Barcelona, SpainResearch and Knowledge CyAD, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Mexico City 14387, MexicoArchitecture Department, Ramon Llull University, La Salle, GRETEL, 08022 Barcelona, SpainArchitecture Department, Ramon Llull University, La Salle, GRETEL, 08022 Barcelona, SpainArchitecture Department, Ramon Llull University, La Salle, GRETEL, 08022 Barcelona, SpainArchitecture Representation Department, Universidad Politécnica de Catalunya, 08034 Barcelona, SpainArchitecture Representation Department, Universidad Politécnica de Catalunya, 08034 Barcelona, SpainSince the international governmental institutions required and/or recommended (according to the regulations of each country and continent) all public works to be certified in the BIM (Building Information Modeling) methodology, public and private institutions and universities have sought to integrate BIM into their production and educational processes. This requires the university academic environment to focus its efforts on training students in this methodology, as they will need to apply it in any future work activities related to architecture and construction. This article seeks to analyze which methods are being used by higher education institutions around the world to integrate BIM implementation in AEC (architecture, engineering, and construction) degrees and to determine if a set of regulatory guidelines exists that could serve as a common foundation for institutions to improve this integration process. To this end, a systematic literature review was carried out on WOS and SCOPUS by applying the PRISMA statement methodology. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were selected based on keywords, abstracts, and full content of the articles. In the end, 23 articles were thoroughly studied, the integration and evaluation methods analyzed, and results obtained. The analysis shows a consensus on the need to develop common academic guidelines across university centers that define a strategy for curriculum modifications and teaching and learning strategies. Finally, future lines of research are identified.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/12/5530education developmentBIM implementationAECconstructionsystematic review |
| spellingShingle | Alia Besné Miguel Ángel Pérez Silvia Necchi Enric Peña David Fonseca Isidro Navarro Ernesto Redondo A Systematic Review of Current Strategies and Methods for BIM Implementation in the Academic Field Applied Sciences education development BIM implementation AEC construction systematic review |
| title | A Systematic Review of Current Strategies and Methods for BIM Implementation in the Academic Field |
| title_full | A Systematic Review of Current Strategies and Methods for BIM Implementation in the Academic Field |
| title_fullStr | A Systematic Review of Current Strategies and Methods for BIM Implementation in the Academic Field |
| title_full_unstemmed | A Systematic Review of Current Strategies and Methods for BIM Implementation in the Academic Field |
| title_short | A Systematic Review of Current Strategies and Methods for BIM Implementation in the Academic Field |
| title_sort | systematic review of current strategies and methods for bim implementation in the academic field |
| topic | education development BIM implementation AEC construction systematic review |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/12/5530 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT aliabesne asystematicreviewofcurrentstrategiesandmethodsforbimimplementationintheacademicfield AT miguelangelperez asystematicreviewofcurrentstrategiesandmethodsforbimimplementationintheacademicfield AT silvianecchi asystematicreviewofcurrentstrategiesandmethodsforbimimplementationintheacademicfield AT enricpena asystematicreviewofcurrentstrategiesandmethodsforbimimplementationintheacademicfield AT davidfonseca asystematicreviewofcurrentstrategiesandmethodsforbimimplementationintheacademicfield AT isidronavarro asystematicreviewofcurrentstrategiesandmethodsforbimimplementationintheacademicfield AT ernestoredondo asystematicreviewofcurrentstrategiesandmethodsforbimimplementationintheacademicfield AT aliabesne systematicreviewofcurrentstrategiesandmethodsforbimimplementationintheacademicfield AT miguelangelperez systematicreviewofcurrentstrategiesandmethodsforbimimplementationintheacademicfield AT silvianecchi systematicreviewofcurrentstrategiesandmethodsforbimimplementationintheacademicfield AT enricpena systematicreviewofcurrentstrategiesandmethodsforbimimplementationintheacademicfield AT davidfonseca systematicreviewofcurrentstrategiesandmethodsforbimimplementationintheacademicfield AT isidronavarro systematicreviewofcurrentstrategiesandmethodsforbimimplementationintheacademicfield AT ernestoredondo systematicreviewofcurrentstrategiesandmethodsforbimimplementationintheacademicfield |