Oncolytic Viruses and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Preclinical Developments to Clinical Trials

Immuno-oncology (IO) has been an active area of oncology research. Following US FDA approval of the first immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI), ipilimumab (human IgG1 k anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibody), in 2011, and of the first oncolytic virus, Imlygic (talimogene laherparepvec), in 2015, there has be...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: June Kyu Hwang, JinWoo Hong, Chae-Ok Yun
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-11-01
Series:International Journal of Molecular Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/21/22/8627
_version_ 1797547741221486592
author June Kyu Hwang
JinWoo Hong
Chae-Ok Yun
author_facet June Kyu Hwang
JinWoo Hong
Chae-Ok Yun
author_sort June Kyu Hwang
collection DOAJ
description Immuno-oncology (IO) has been an active area of oncology research. Following US FDA approval of the first immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI), ipilimumab (human IgG1 k anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibody), in 2011, and of the first oncolytic virus, Imlygic (talimogene laherparepvec), in 2015, there has been renewed interest in IO. In the past decade, ICIs have changed the treatment paradigm for many cancers by enabling better therapeutic control, resuming immune surveillance, suppressing tumor immunosuppression, and restoring antitumor immune function. However, ICI therapies are effective only in a small subset of patients and show limited therapeutic potential due to their inability to demonstrate efficacy in ‘cold’ or unresponsive tumor microenvironments (TMEs). Relatedly, oncolytic viruses (OVs) have been shown to induce antitumor immune responses, augment the efficacy of existing cancer treatments, and reform unresponsive TME to turn ‘cold’ tumors ‘hot,’ increasing their susceptibility to checkpoint blockade immunotherapies. For this reason, OVs serve as ideal complements to ICIs, and multiple preclinical studies and clinical trials are demonstrating their combined therapeutic efficacy. This review will discuss the merits and limitations of OVs and ICIs as monotherapy then progress onto the preclinical rationale and the results of clinical trials of key combination therapies.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T14:49:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-185f106ed0c8481085c9091f80c906da
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1661-6596
1422-0067
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T14:49:28Z
publishDate 2020-11-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series International Journal of Molecular Sciences
spelling doaj.art-185f106ed0c8481085c9091f80c906da2023-11-20T21:05:56ZengMDPI AGInternational Journal of Molecular Sciences1661-65961422-00672020-11-012122862710.3390/ijms21228627Oncolytic Viruses and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Preclinical Developments to Clinical TrialsJune Kyu Hwang0JinWoo Hong1Chae-Ok Yun2Department of Bioengineering, College of Engineering, Hanyang University, 222 Wangsimni-ro, Seongdong-gu, Seoul 04763, KoreaDepartment of Bioengineering, College of Engineering, Hanyang University, 222 Wangsimni-ro, Seongdong-gu, Seoul 04763, KoreaDepartment of Bioengineering, College of Engineering, Hanyang University, 222 Wangsimni-ro, Seongdong-gu, Seoul 04763, KoreaImmuno-oncology (IO) has been an active area of oncology research. Following US FDA approval of the first immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI), ipilimumab (human IgG1 k anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibody), in 2011, and of the first oncolytic virus, Imlygic (talimogene laherparepvec), in 2015, there has been renewed interest in IO. In the past decade, ICIs have changed the treatment paradigm for many cancers by enabling better therapeutic control, resuming immune surveillance, suppressing tumor immunosuppression, and restoring antitumor immune function. However, ICI therapies are effective only in a small subset of patients and show limited therapeutic potential due to their inability to demonstrate efficacy in ‘cold’ or unresponsive tumor microenvironments (TMEs). Relatedly, oncolytic viruses (OVs) have been shown to induce antitumor immune responses, augment the efficacy of existing cancer treatments, and reform unresponsive TME to turn ‘cold’ tumors ‘hot,’ increasing their susceptibility to checkpoint blockade immunotherapies. For this reason, OVs serve as ideal complements to ICIs, and multiple preclinical studies and clinical trials are demonstrating their combined therapeutic efficacy. This review will discuss the merits and limitations of OVs and ICIs as monotherapy then progress onto the preclinical rationale and the results of clinical trials of key combination therapies.https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/21/22/8627oncolytic virus 1immune checkpoint inhibitor 2immuno-oncology 3combination therapy 4
spellingShingle June Kyu Hwang
JinWoo Hong
Chae-Ok Yun
Oncolytic Viruses and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Preclinical Developments to Clinical Trials
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
oncolytic virus 1
immune checkpoint inhibitor 2
immuno-oncology 3
combination therapy 4
title Oncolytic Viruses and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Preclinical Developments to Clinical Trials
title_full Oncolytic Viruses and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Preclinical Developments to Clinical Trials
title_fullStr Oncolytic Viruses and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Preclinical Developments to Clinical Trials
title_full_unstemmed Oncolytic Viruses and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Preclinical Developments to Clinical Trials
title_short Oncolytic Viruses and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Preclinical Developments to Clinical Trials
title_sort oncolytic viruses and immune checkpoint inhibitors preclinical developments to clinical trials
topic oncolytic virus 1
immune checkpoint inhibitor 2
immuno-oncology 3
combination therapy 4
url https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/21/22/8627
work_keys_str_mv AT junekyuhwang oncolyticvirusesandimmunecheckpointinhibitorspreclinicaldevelopmentstoclinicaltrials
AT jinwoohong oncolyticvirusesandimmunecheckpointinhibitorspreclinicaldevelopmentstoclinicaltrials
AT chaeokyun oncolyticvirusesandimmunecheckpointinhibitorspreclinicaldevelopmentstoclinicaltrials