Données institutionnelles et données contributives sur la biodiversité, quelle légitimité ?

Conservation policies for biodiversity, major consumers of spatial data, is now facing a double movement: the lack of public funding for environmental recognition and the rise of participatory mapping. Official information, which is developing with difficulty, is today overwhelmed by the plethora of inf...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xavier Amelot, Laurent Couderchet, Matthieu Noucher
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: OpenEdition
Series:M@ppemonde
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/mappemonde/2861
_version_ 1827351952278683648
author Xavier Amelot
Laurent Couderchet
Matthieu Noucher
author_facet Xavier Amelot
Laurent Couderchet
Matthieu Noucher
author_sort Xavier Amelot
collection DOAJ
description Conservation policies for biodiversity, major consumers of spatial data, is now facing a double movement: the lack of public funding for environmental recognition and the rise of participatory mapping. Official information, which is developing with difficulty, is today overwhelmed by the plethora of information unofficially gathered and published on the Internet. This is a discussion of the legitimacy of such data and its admissibility by conservation policies.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T02:55:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-187005e3c2b247a3b8b03bb5d0f23a6e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0764-3470
1769-7298
language Spanish
last_indexed 2024-03-08T02:55:43Z
publisher OpenEdition
record_format Article
series M@ppemonde
spelling doaj.art-187005e3c2b247a3b8b03bb5d0f23a6e2024-02-13T12:55:09ZspaOpenEditionM@ppemonde0764-34701769-729812010.4000/mappemonde.2861Données institutionnelles et données contributives sur la biodiversité, quelle légitimité ?Xavier AmelotLaurent CouderchetMatthieu NoucherConservation policies for biodiversity, major consumers of spatial data, is now facing a double movement: the lack of public funding for environmental recognition and the rise of participatory mapping. Official information, which is developing with difficulty, is today overwhelmed by the plethora of information unofficially gathered and published on the Internet. This is a discussion of the legitimacy of such data and its admissibility by conservation policies.https://journals.openedition.org/mappemonde/2861web-mapping 2.0volunteered geographic informationdata legitimacybiodiversity politics
spellingShingle Xavier Amelot
Laurent Couderchet
Matthieu Noucher
Données institutionnelles et données contributives sur la biodiversité, quelle légitimité ?
M@ppemonde
web-mapping 2.0
volunteered geographic information
data legitimacy
biodiversity politics
title Données institutionnelles et données contributives sur la biodiversité, quelle légitimité ?
title_full Données institutionnelles et données contributives sur la biodiversité, quelle légitimité ?
title_fullStr Données institutionnelles et données contributives sur la biodiversité, quelle légitimité ?
title_full_unstemmed Données institutionnelles et données contributives sur la biodiversité, quelle légitimité ?
title_short Données institutionnelles et données contributives sur la biodiversité, quelle légitimité ?
title_sort donnees institutionnelles et donnees contributives sur la biodiversite quelle legitimite
topic web-mapping 2.0
volunteered geographic information
data legitimacy
biodiversity politics
url https://journals.openedition.org/mappemonde/2861
work_keys_str_mv AT xavieramelot donneesinstitutionnellesetdonneescontributivessurlabiodiversitequellelegitimite
AT laurentcouderchet donneesinstitutionnellesetdonneescontributivessurlabiodiversitequellelegitimite
AT matthieunoucher donneesinstitutionnellesetdonneescontributivessurlabiodiversitequellelegitimite