Breath biomarkers in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a systematic review

Abstract Background Exhaled biomarkers may be related to disease processes in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) however their clinical role remains unclear. We performed a systematic review to investigate whether breath biomarkers discriminate between patients with IPF and healthy controls. We als...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Conal Hayton, Dayle Terrington, Andrew M. Wilson, Nazia Chaudhuri, Colm Leonard, Stephen J. Fowler
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-01-01
Series:Respiratory Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12931-019-0971-8
_version_ 1818110117819711488
author Conal Hayton
Dayle Terrington
Andrew M. Wilson
Nazia Chaudhuri
Colm Leonard
Stephen J. Fowler
author_facet Conal Hayton
Dayle Terrington
Andrew M. Wilson
Nazia Chaudhuri
Colm Leonard
Stephen J. Fowler
author_sort Conal Hayton
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Exhaled biomarkers may be related to disease processes in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) however their clinical role remains unclear. We performed a systematic review to investigate whether breath biomarkers discriminate between patients with IPF and healthy controls. We also assessed correlation with lung function, ability to distinguish diagnostic subgroups and change in response to treatment. Methods MEDLINE, EMBASE and Web of Science databases were searched. Study selection was limited to adults with a diagnosis of IPF as per international guidelines. Results Of 1014 studies screened, fourteen fulfilled selection criteria and included 257 IPF patients. Twenty individual biomarkers discriminated between IPF and controls and four showed correlation with lung function. Meta-analysis of three studies indicated mean (± SD) alveolar nitric oxide (CalvNO) levels were significantly higher in IPF (8.5 ± 5.5 ppb) than controls (4.4 ± 2.2 ppb). Markers of oxidative stress in exhaled breath condensate, such as hydrogen peroxide and 8-isoprostane, were also discriminatory. Two breathomic studies have isolated discriminative compounds using mass spectrometry. There was a lack of studies assessing relevant treatment and none assessed differences in diagnostic subgroups. Conclusions Evidence suggests CalvNO is higher in IPF, although studies were limited by small sample size. Further breathomic work may identify biomarkers with diagnostic and prognostic potential.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T02:42:03Z
format Article
id doaj.art-18820c142f2e4e389367c9a15eb696a6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1465-993X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T02:42:03Z
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Respiratory Research
spelling doaj.art-18820c142f2e4e389367c9a15eb696a62022-12-22T01:23:31ZengBMCRespiratory Research1465-993X2019-01-0120111610.1186/s12931-019-0971-8Breath biomarkers in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a systematic reviewConal Hayton0Dayle Terrington1Andrew M. Wilson2Nazia Chaudhuri3Colm Leonard4Stephen J. Fowler5Division of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of ManchesterNorwich Medical School, University of East AngliaNorwich Medical School, University of East AngliaNorth West Lung Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation TrustNorth West Lung Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation TrustDivision of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of ManchesterAbstract Background Exhaled biomarkers may be related to disease processes in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) however their clinical role remains unclear. We performed a systematic review to investigate whether breath biomarkers discriminate between patients with IPF and healthy controls. We also assessed correlation with lung function, ability to distinguish diagnostic subgroups and change in response to treatment. Methods MEDLINE, EMBASE and Web of Science databases were searched. Study selection was limited to adults with a diagnosis of IPF as per international guidelines. Results Of 1014 studies screened, fourteen fulfilled selection criteria and included 257 IPF patients. Twenty individual biomarkers discriminated between IPF and controls and four showed correlation with lung function. Meta-analysis of three studies indicated mean (± SD) alveolar nitric oxide (CalvNO) levels were significantly higher in IPF (8.5 ± 5.5 ppb) than controls (4.4 ± 2.2 ppb). Markers of oxidative stress in exhaled breath condensate, such as hydrogen peroxide and 8-isoprostane, were also discriminatory. Two breathomic studies have isolated discriminative compounds using mass spectrometry. There was a lack of studies assessing relevant treatment and none assessed differences in diagnostic subgroups. Conclusions Evidence suggests CalvNO is higher in IPF, although studies were limited by small sample size. Further breathomic work may identify biomarkers with diagnostic and prognostic potential.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12931-019-0971-8Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosisBreath testsNitric oxideVolatile organic compoundsExhaled breath condensate
spellingShingle Conal Hayton
Dayle Terrington
Andrew M. Wilson
Nazia Chaudhuri
Colm Leonard
Stephen J. Fowler
Breath biomarkers in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a systematic review
Respiratory Research
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
Breath tests
Nitric oxide
Volatile organic compounds
Exhaled breath condensate
title Breath biomarkers in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a systematic review
title_full Breath biomarkers in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a systematic review
title_fullStr Breath biomarkers in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Breath biomarkers in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a systematic review
title_short Breath biomarkers in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a systematic review
title_sort breath biomarkers in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis a systematic review
topic Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
Breath tests
Nitric oxide
Volatile organic compounds
Exhaled breath condensate
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12931-019-0971-8
work_keys_str_mv AT conalhayton breathbiomarkersinidiopathicpulmonaryfibrosisasystematicreview
AT dayleterrington breathbiomarkersinidiopathicpulmonaryfibrosisasystematicreview
AT andrewmwilson breathbiomarkersinidiopathicpulmonaryfibrosisasystematicreview
AT naziachaudhuri breathbiomarkersinidiopathicpulmonaryfibrosisasystematicreview
AT colmleonard breathbiomarkersinidiopathicpulmonaryfibrosisasystematicreview
AT stephenjfowler breathbiomarkersinidiopathicpulmonaryfibrosisasystematicreview