The dilemma of the academic industrial psychologist

The university industrial psychologist is often faced with a conflict between his roles as an 'academic scientist' and as a 'professional technician'. It is argued that this problem of 'dual allegiance' can be resolved to a large extent if the industrial psychologist: (...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: C. Orpen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AOSIS 1977-11-01
Series:SA Journal of Industrial Psychology
Online Access:https://sajip.co.za/index.php/sajip/article/view/287
_version_ 1818515481219301376
author C. Orpen
author_facet C. Orpen
author_sort C. Orpen
collection DOAJ
description The university industrial psychologist is often faced with a conflict between his roles as an 'academic scientist' and as a 'professional technician'. It is argued that this problem of 'dual allegiance' can be resolved to a large extent if the industrial psychologist: (i) reminds himself (and his students) that industrial psychology is not a special discipline on its own, but is an integral part of psychology-in-general, (ii) does not view his subject as just a mirror of professional practice, (iii) has regard for his subject as a scientific discipline, and not just as a useful tool for management, and (iv) convinces practitioners of the value of the subject in a variety of areas, ranging from testing to consumer behaviour. Opsomming Die bedryfsielkundige aan die universiteit kom dikwels te staan voor 'n konflik tussen sy rol as "akademiese wetenskaplike" en "professionele tegnikus". Dit word beweer dat hierdie probleem van "tweeledige verbondenheid" tot ‘n groot mate opgelos kan word as die bedryfsielkundige (en sy studente): (a) dit in gedagte hou dat bedryfsielkunde nie wesentlik 'n onafhanklike dissipline is nie, maar 'n integrale deel van sielkunde-in-diealgemeen vorm, (b) nie sy vak as slegs 'n weerspieëling van die professionele praktyk beskou nie, (c) agting vir sy vak as 'n wetenskaplike dissipline het en nie net as 'n gerieflike werktuig vir bestuur beskou word nie, en (d) die praktyk kan oortuig van die waarde van die vak in 'n verskeidenheid gebiede, wat strek van toetsing tot verbruikersgedrag.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T00:29:24Z
format Article
id doaj.art-18945e933b2e48aeb5c1f9365c7ed29e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0258-5200
2071-0763
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T00:29:24Z
publishDate 1977-11-01
publisher AOSIS
record_format Article
series SA Journal of Industrial Psychology
spelling doaj.art-18945e933b2e48aeb5c1f9365c7ed29e2022-12-22T01:27:24ZengAOSISSA Journal of Industrial Psychology0258-52002071-07631977-11-010010.4102/sajip.v0i0.287283The dilemma of the academic industrial psychologistC. OrpenThe university industrial psychologist is often faced with a conflict between his roles as an 'academic scientist' and as a 'professional technician'. It is argued that this problem of 'dual allegiance' can be resolved to a large extent if the industrial psychologist: (i) reminds himself (and his students) that industrial psychology is not a special discipline on its own, but is an integral part of psychology-in-general, (ii) does not view his subject as just a mirror of professional practice, (iii) has regard for his subject as a scientific discipline, and not just as a useful tool for management, and (iv) convinces practitioners of the value of the subject in a variety of areas, ranging from testing to consumer behaviour. Opsomming Die bedryfsielkundige aan die universiteit kom dikwels te staan voor 'n konflik tussen sy rol as "akademiese wetenskaplike" en "professionele tegnikus". Dit word beweer dat hierdie probleem van "tweeledige verbondenheid" tot ‘n groot mate opgelos kan word as die bedryfsielkundige (en sy studente): (a) dit in gedagte hou dat bedryfsielkunde nie wesentlik 'n onafhanklike dissipline is nie, maar 'n integrale deel van sielkunde-in-diealgemeen vorm, (b) nie sy vak as slegs 'n weerspieëling van die professionele praktyk beskou nie, (c) agting vir sy vak as 'n wetenskaplike dissipline het en nie net as 'n gerieflike werktuig vir bestuur beskou word nie, en (d) die praktyk kan oortuig van die waarde van die vak in 'n verskeidenheid gebiede, wat strek van toetsing tot verbruikersgedrag.https://sajip.co.za/index.php/sajip/article/view/287
spellingShingle C. Orpen
The dilemma of the academic industrial psychologist
SA Journal of Industrial Psychology
title The dilemma of the academic industrial psychologist
title_full The dilemma of the academic industrial psychologist
title_fullStr The dilemma of the academic industrial psychologist
title_full_unstemmed The dilemma of the academic industrial psychologist
title_short The dilemma of the academic industrial psychologist
title_sort dilemma of the academic industrial psychologist
url https://sajip.co.za/index.php/sajip/article/view/287
work_keys_str_mv AT corpen thedilemmaoftheacademicindustrialpsychologist
AT corpen dilemmaoftheacademicindustrialpsychologist