Cephalometrıc Evaluatıon Of Profıle Changes In Class Iı Dıvısıon J Cases By Combıned Heagear Therapy
In the treament of class II division 1 malocclusions, application of extra-oral force traction is an effective means of a treatment modality. The magnitude, duration and direction of the headgear force is as important as the craniofacial growth pattern of the individual patient. Elimination of the o...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Galenos Yayinevi
1990-11-01
|
| Series: | Turkish Journal of Orthodontics |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: |
http://www.turkjorthod.org/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/cephalometrc-evaluaton-of-profle-changes-n-class--/54409
|
| _version_ | 1797767166857052160 |
|---|---|
| author | Semra Ciğer Mehmet Özgen Eray Erdoğan |
| author_facet | Semra Ciğer Mehmet Özgen Eray Erdoğan |
| author_sort | Semra Ciğer |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | In the treament of class II division 1 malocclusions, application of extra-oral force traction is an effective means of a treatment modality. The magnitude, duration and direction of the headgear force is as important as the craniofacial growth pattern of the individual patient. Elimination of the overjet and the jaw discrepancy necessiate adjunctive edgewise mechanotherapy. In this regard, retraction of the upper incisors contributes favorably to the soft tissue profile. The implication of the combined headgear traction on the maxilla is evident as it does not cause a rotation of the maxillary complex. Furthermore, it not only inhibits/retards the growth of the maxilla but also frees the mandible to catch up with the maxilla. Consequently, the mandible achieves optimum growth. The smiling line is also positively effected by the growth retardation/inhibition furnished by the combined headgear traction and subsequent incisor retraction and intrusion. These prevent the unsightly exposure of the gums or in other words the “gummy smile”. In this paper, cephalometric evaluation of combined headgear treament of class II division I individuals is presented with a control group of similar malocclusion and statistical findings of the study are considered to be significant. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-12T20:34:55Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-189964d4948b4d88b0b3bf1a242cd5a3 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2528-9659 2148-9505 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-12T20:34:55Z |
| publishDate | 1990-11-01 |
| publisher | Galenos Yayinevi |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Turkish Journal of Orthodontics |
| spelling | doaj.art-189964d4948b4d88b0b3bf1a242cd5a32023-08-01T13:07:05ZengGalenos YayineviTurkish Journal of Orthodontics2528-96592148-95051990-11-0132929810.13076/1300-3550-3-2-9213049054Cephalometrıc Evaluatıon Of Profıle Changes In Class Iı Dıvısıon J Cases By Combıned Heagear TherapySemra Ciğer0Mehmet Özgen1Eray Erdoğan2 H.Ü. Ortodonti Ana Bilim Dalı H.Ü. Ortodonti Ana Bilim Dalı H.Ü. Ortodonti Ana Bilim Dalı In the treament of class II division 1 malocclusions, application of extra-oral force traction is an effective means of a treatment modality. The magnitude, duration and direction of the headgear force is as important as the craniofacial growth pattern of the individual patient. Elimination of the overjet and the jaw discrepancy necessiate adjunctive edgewise mechanotherapy. In this regard, retraction of the upper incisors contributes favorably to the soft tissue profile. The implication of the combined headgear traction on the maxilla is evident as it does not cause a rotation of the maxillary complex. Furthermore, it not only inhibits/retards the growth of the maxilla but also frees the mandible to catch up with the maxilla. Consequently, the mandible achieves optimum growth. The smiling line is also positively effected by the growth retardation/inhibition furnished by the combined headgear traction and subsequent incisor retraction and intrusion. These prevent the unsightly exposure of the gums or in other words the “gummy smile”. In this paper, cephalometric evaluation of combined headgear treament of class II division I individuals is presented with a control group of similar malocclusion and statistical findings of the study are considered to be significant. http://www.turkjorthod.org/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/cephalometrc-evaluaton-of-profle-changes-n-class--/54409 combined headgeargummy smile |
| spellingShingle | Semra Ciğer Mehmet Özgen Eray Erdoğan Cephalometrıc Evaluatıon Of Profıle Changes In Class Iı Dıvısıon J Cases By Combıned Heagear Therapy Turkish Journal of Orthodontics combined headgear gummy smile |
| title | Cephalometrıc Evaluatıon Of Profıle Changes In Class Iı Dıvısıon J Cases By Combıned Heagear Therapy |
| title_full | Cephalometrıc Evaluatıon Of Profıle Changes In Class Iı Dıvısıon J Cases By Combıned Heagear Therapy |
| title_fullStr | Cephalometrıc Evaluatıon Of Profıle Changes In Class Iı Dıvısıon J Cases By Combıned Heagear Therapy |
| title_full_unstemmed | Cephalometrıc Evaluatıon Of Profıle Changes In Class Iı Dıvısıon J Cases By Combıned Heagear Therapy |
| title_short | Cephalometrıc Evaluatıon Of Profıle Changes In Class Iı Dıvısıon J Cases By Combıned Heagear Therapy |
| title_sort | cephalometric evaluation of profile changes in class ii division j cases by combined heagear therapy |
| topic | combined headgear gummy smile |
| url |
http://www.turkjorthod.org/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/cephalometrc-evaluaton-of-profle-changes-n-class--/54409
|
| work_keys_str_mv | AT semraciger cephalometrıcevaluatıonofprofılechangesinclassiıdıvısıonjcasesbycombınedheageartherapy AT mehmetozgen cephalometrıcevaluatıonofprofılechangesinclassiıdıvısıonjcasesbycombınedheageartherapy AT erayerdogan cephalometrıcevaluatıonofprofılechangesinclassiıdıvısıonjcasesbycombınedheageartherapy |