Complementing Tissue Testing With Plasma Mutation Profiling Improves Therapeutic Decision-Making for Patients With Lung Cancer

BackgroundTissue biopsy is an integral part of the diagnostic approach to lung cancer. It is however invasive and limited by heterogeneity. Liquid biopsies may complement tissue testing by providing additional molecular information and may be particularly helpful in patients from whom obtaining suff...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yukti Choudhury, Min-Han Tan, Jun Li Shi, Augustine Tee, Kao Chin Ngeow, Jonathan Poh, Ruth Rosalyn Goh, Jamie Mong
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-02-01
Series:Frontiers in Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2022.758464/full
_version_ 1818897265031380992
author Yukti Choudhury
Min-Han Tan
Jun Li Shi
Augustine Tee
Kao Chin Ngeow
Jonathan Poh
Ruth Rosalyn Goh
Ruth Rosalyn Goh
Jamie Mong
author_facet Yukti Choudhury
Min-Han Tan
Jun Li Shi
Augustine Tee
Kao Chin Ngeow
Jonathan Poh
Ruth Rosalyn Goh
Ruth Rosalyn Goh
Jamie Mong
author_sort Yukti Choudhury
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundTissue biopsy is an integral part of the diagnostic approach to lung cancer. It is however invasive and limited by heterogeneity. Liquid biopsies may complement tissue testing by providing additional molecular information and may be particularly helpful in patients from whom obtaining sufficient tissue for genomic profiling is challenging.MethodsPatients with suspected lung cancer (n = 71) were prospectively recruited. Blood and diagnostic tissue samples were collected within 48 h of each other. Plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing was done using an ultrasensitive amplicon-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel (plasma NGS testing). For cases diagnosed as non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) via histology or cytology, targeted testing for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations was performed using tissue biopsy samples (tissue EGFR testing), where available. Concordance of clinically actionable mutations between methods and sample types was assessed.ResultsFor confirmed NSCLC cases (n = 54), tissue EGFR test results were available only for 70.3% (38/54) due to sample inadequacies, compared to blood samples for 98.1% (53/54) cases. Tissue EGFR testing identified sensitizing EGFR (L858R or exon 19 deletion) mutation in 31.6% (12/38) of cases. Plasma NGS identified clinically actionable mutations in 37.7% (20/53) of cases, including EGFR mutations in two cases with no tissue EGFR results, and mutations in KRAS, BRAF, and MET. The overall sensitivity of sensitizing EGFR mutation detection by plasma NGS was 75% (9/12), and specificity was 100% (25/25) in patients tested in both tissue EGFR and plasma NGS (n = 37). In this cohort of patients, tissue EGFR testing alone informed clinical decisions in 22.2% (12/54) of cases. Adding plasma NGS to tissue EGFR testing increased the detection rate of actionable mutations to 42.6% (23/54), representing a 1.9-fold increase in clinically relevant findings. The average turnaround time of plasma NGS was shorter than standard tissue testing (10 vs. 29.9 days, p < 0.05).ConclusionsIn the first-line setting, plasma NGS was highly concordant with tissue EGFR testing. Plasma NGS increases the detection of actionable findings with a shorter time to results. This study outlines the clinical utility of complementary plasma mutation profiling in the routine management of lung cancer patients.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T19:13:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-18bc92e5fa164925bad8db8ad4d66c9f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-858X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T19:13:25Z
publishDate 2022-02-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Medicine
spelling doaj.art-18bc92e5fa164925bad8db8ad4d66c9f2022-12-21T20:09:12ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Medicine2296-858X2022-02-01910.3389/fmed.2022.758464758464Complementing Tissue Testing With Plasma Mutation Profiling Improves Therapeutic Decision-Making for Patients With Lung CancerYukti Choudhury0Min-Han Tan1Jun Li Shi2Augustine Tee3Kao Chin Ngeow4Jonathan Poh5Ruth Rosalyn Goh6Ruth Rosalyn Goh7Jamie Mong8Lucence Diagnostics Pte. Ltd., Singapore, SingaporeLucence Health Inc, Palo Alto, CA, United StatesInstitute of Bioengineering and Nanotechnology, Singapore, SingaporeDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Changi General Hospital, Singapore, SingaporeLucence Diagnostics Pte. Ltd., Singapore, SingaporeLucence Diagnostics Pte. Ltd., Singapore, SingaporeLucence Diagnostics Pte. Ltd., Singapore, SingaporeFaculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United KingdomInstitute of Bioengineering and Bioimaging, Singapore, SingaporeBackgroundTissue biopsy is an integral part of the diagnostic approach to lung cancer. It is however invasive and limited by heterogeneity. Liquid biopsies may complement tissue testing by providing additional molecular information and may be particularly helpful in patients from whom obtaining sufficient tissue for genomic profiling is challenging.MethodsPatients with suspected lung cancer (n = 71) were prospectively recruited. Blood and diagnostic tissue samples were collected within 48 h of each other. Plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing was done using an ultrasensitive amplicon-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel (plasma NGS testing). For cases diagnosed as non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) via histology or cytology, targeted testing for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations was performed using tissue biopsy samples (tissue EGFR testing), where available. Concordance of clinically actionable mutations between methods and sample types was assessed.ResultsFor confirmed NSCLC cases (n = 54), tissue EGFR test results were available only for 70.3% (38/54) due to sample inadequacies, compared to blood samples for 98.1% (53/54) cases. Tissue EGFR testing identified sensitizing EGFR (L858R or exon 19 deletion) mutation in 31.6% (12/38) of cases. Plasma NGS identified clinically actionable mutations in 37.7% (20/53) of cases, including EGFR mutations in two cases with no tissue EGFR results, and mutations in KRAS, BRAF, and MET. The overall sensitivity of sensitizing EGFR mutation detection by plasma NGS was 75% (9/12), and specificity was 100% (25/25) in patients tested in both tissue EGFR and plasma NGS (n = 37). In this cohort of patients, tissue EGFR testing alone informed clinical decisions in 22.2% (12/54) of cases. Adding plasma NGS to tissue EGFR testing increased the detection rate of actionable mutations to 42.6% (23/54), representing a 1.9-fold increase in clinically relevant findings. The average turnaround time of plasma NGS was shorter than standard tissue testing (10 vs. 29.9 days, p < 0.05).ConclusionsIn the first-line setting, plasma NGS was highly concordant with tissue EGFR testing. Plasma NGS increases the detection of actionable findings with a shorter time to results. This study outlines the clinical utility of complementary plasma mutation profiling in the routine management of lung cancer patients.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2022.758464/fullliquid biopsy and circulating tumor DNAnon-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)plasma-firstnext generation sequencingamplicon-based NGStumor heterogeneity
spellingShingle Yukti Choudhury
Min-Han Tan
Jun Li Shi
Augustine Tee
Kao Chin Ngeow
Jonathan Poh
Ruth Rosalyn Goh
Ruth Rosalyn Goh
Jamie Mong
Complementing Tissue Testing With Plasma Mutation Profiling Improves Therapeutic Decision-Making for Patients With Lung Cancer
Frontiers in Medicine
liquid biopsy and circulating tumor DNA
non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
plasma-first
next generation sequencing
amplicon-based NGS
tumor heterogeneity
title Complementing Tissue Testing With Plasma Mutation Profiling Improves Therapeutic Decision-Making for Patients With Lung Cancer
title_full Complementing Tissue Testing With Plasma Mutation Profiling Improves Therapeutic Decision-Making for Patients With Lung Cancer
title_fullStr Complementing Tissue Testing With Plasma Mutation Profiling Improves Therapeutic Decision-Making for Patients With Lung Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Complementing Tissue Testing With Plasma Mutation Profiling Improves Therapeutic Decision-Making for Patients With Lung Cancer
title_short Complementing Tissue Testing With Plasma Mutation Profiling Improves Therapeutic Decision-Making for Patients With Lung Cancer
title_sort complementing tissue testing with plasma mutation profiling improves therapeutic decision making for patients with lung cancer
topic liquid biopsy and circulating tumor DNA
non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
plasma-first
next generation sequencing
amplicon-based NGS
tumor heterogeneity
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2022.758464/full
work_keys_str_mv AT yuktichoudhury complementingtissuetestingwithplasmamutationprofilingimprovestherapeuticdecisionmakingforpatientswithlungcancer
AT minhantan complementingtissuetestingwithplasmamutationprofilingimprovestherapeuticdecisionmakingforpatientswithlungcancer
AT junlishi complementingtissuetestingwithplasmamutationprofilingimprovestherapeuticdecisionmakingforpatientswithlungcancer
AT augustinetee complementingtissuetestingwithplasmamutationprofilingimprovestherapeuticdecisionmakingforpatientswithlungcancer
AT kaochinngeow complementingtissuetestingwithplasmamutationprofilingimprovestherapeuticdecisionmakingforpatientswithlungcancer
AT jonathanpoh complementingtissuetestingwithplasmamutationprofilingimprovestherapeuticdecisionmakingforpatientswithlungcancer
AT ruthrosalyngoh complementingtissuetestingwithplasmamutationprofilingimprovestherapeuticdecisionmakingforpatientswithlungcancer
AT ruthrosalyngoh complementingtissuetestingwithplasmamutationprofilingimprovestherapeuticdecisionmakingforpatientswithlungcancer
AT jamiemong complementingtissuetestingwithplasmamutationprofilingimprovestherapeuticdecisionmakingforpatientswithlungcancer