Net primary productivity of forest stands in New Hampshire estimated from Landsat and MODIS satellite data

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>A simulation model that relies on satellite observations of vegetation cover from the Landsat 7 sensor and from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) was used to estimate net primary productivity (NPP) of forest s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Genovese Vanessa, Gross Peggy, Potter Christopher, Smith Marie-Louise
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2007-10-01
Series:Carbon Balance and Management
Online Access:http://www.cbmjournal.com/content/2/1/9
_version_ 1818385989447450624
author Genovese Vanessa
Gross Peggy
Potter Christopher
Smith Marie-Louise
author_facet Genovese Vanessa
Gross Peggy
Potter Christopher
Smith Marie-Louise
author_sort Genovese Vanessa
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>A simulation model that relies on satellite observations of vegetation cover from the Landsat 7 sensor and from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) was used to estimate net primary productivity (NPP) of forest stands at the Bartlett Experiment Forest (BEF) in the White Mountains of New Hampshire.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Net primary production (NPP) predicted from the NASA-CASA model using 30-meter resolution Landsat inputs showed variations related to both vegetation cover type and elevational effects on mean air temperatures. Overall, the highest predicted NPP from the NASA-CASA model was for deciduous forest cover at low to mid-elevation locations over the landscape. Comparison of the model-predicted annual NPP to the plot-estimated values showed a significant correlation of R<sup>2 </sup>= 0.5. Stepwise addition of 30-meter resolution elevation data values explained no more than 20% of the residual variation in measured NPP patterns at BEF. Both the Landsat 7 and the 250-meter resolution MODIS derived mean annual NPP predictions for the BEF plot locations were within ± 2.5% of the mean of plot estimates for annual NPP.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Although MODIS imagery cannot capture the spatial details of NPP across the network of closely spaced plot locations as well as Landsat, the MODIS satellite data as inputs to the NASA-CASA model does accurately predict the average annual productivity of a site like the BEF.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-14T03:46:55Z
format Article
id doaj.art-18bf10bc067d4015990161e2528c9c2e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1750-0680
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T03:46:55Z
publishDate 2007-10-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Carbon Balance and Management
spelling doaj.art-18bf10bc067d4015990161e2528c9c2e2022-12-21T23:18:20ZengBMCCarbon Balance and Management1750-06802007-10-0121910.1186/1750-0680-2-9Net primary productivity of forest stands in New Hampshire estimated from Landsat and MODIS satellite dataGenovese VanessaGross PeggyPotter ChristopherSmith Marie-Louise<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>A simulation model that relies on satellite observations of vegetation cover from the Landsat 7 sensor and from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) was used to estimate net primary productivity (NPP) of forest stands at the Bartlett Experiment Forest (BEF) in the White Mountains of New Hampshire.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Net primary production (NPP) predicted from the NASA-CASA model using 30-meter resolution Landsat inputs showed variations related to both vegetation cover type and elevational effects on mean air temperatures. Overall, the highest predicted NPP from the NASA-CASA model was for deciduous forest cover at low to mid-elevation locations over the landscape. Comparison of the model-predicted annual NPP to the plot-estimated values showed a significant correlation of R<sup>2 </sup>= 0.5. Stepwise addition of 30-meter resolution elevation data values explained no more than 20% of the residual variation in measured NPP patterns at BEF. Both the Landsat 7 and the 250-meter resolution MODIS derived mean annual NPP predictions for the BEF plot locations were within ± 2.5% of the mean of plot estimates for annual NPP.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Although MODIS imagery cannot capture the spatial details of NPP across the network of closely spaced plot locations as well as Landsat, the MODIS satellite data as inputs to the NASA-CASA model does accurately predict the average annual productivity of a site like the BEF.</p>http://www.cbmjournal.com/content/2/1/9
spellingShingle Genovese Vanessa
Gross Peggy
Potter Christopher
Smith Marie-Louise
Net primary productivity of forest stands in New Hampshire estimated from Landsat and MODIS satellite data
Carbon Balance and Management
title Net primary productivity of forest stands in New Hampshire estimated from Landsat and MODIS satellite data
title_full Net primary productivity of forest stands in New Hampshire estimated from Landsat and MODIS satellite data
title_fullStr Net primary productivity of forest stands in New Hampshire estimated from Landsat and MODIS satellite data
title_full_unstemmed Net primary productivity of forest stands in New Hampshire estimated from Landsat and MODIS satellite data
title_short Net primary productivity of forest stands in New Hampshire estimated from Landsat and MODIS satellite data
title_sort net primary productivity of forest stands in new hampshire estimated from landsat and modis satellite data
url http://www.cbmjournal.com/content/2/1/9
work_keys_str_mv AT genovesevanessa netprimaryproductivityofforeststandsinnewhampshireestimatedfromlandsatandmodissatellitedata
AT grosspeggy netprimaryproductivityofforeststandsinnewhampshireestimatedfromlandsatandmodissatellitedata
AT potterchristopher netprimaryproductivityofforeststandsinnewhampshireestimatedfromlandsatandmodissatellitedata
AT smithmarielouise netprimaryproductivityofforeststandsinnewhampshireestimatedfromlandsatandmodissatellitedata