“Get us partnerships!” - a qualitative study of Angolan and Mozambican health academics’ experiences with North/South partnerships

Abstract Background Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 17 focuses on North/South partnerships for sustainable development. Literature on research partnerships and capacity -building often neglects how these processes are carried out in practice, their social impacts and participants’ subjective expe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Isabel Craveiro, António Carvalho, Paulo Ferrinho
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-04-01
Series:Globalization and Health
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12992-020-00562-7
_version_ 1811323193095356416
author Isabel Craveiro
António Carvalho
Paulo Ferrinho
author_facet Isabel Craveiro
António Carvalho
Paulo Ferrinho
author_sort Isabel Craveiro
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 17 focuses on North/South partnerships for sustainable development. Literature on research partnerships and capacity -building often neglects how these processes are carried out in practice, their social impacts and participants’ subjective experiences. Recognizing the increasingly global dimensions of Higher Education Institutions, the University Development and Innovation – Africa project (UDI-A) was designed to train lecturers and administrative staff of Angolan and Mozambican Universities through collaborations with European institutions, aiming at strengthening African academic and social landscapes through knowledge translation and dissemination. This paper examines potential outcomes of UDI-A on participants’ academic pathways, investigating the conflict between different imaginaries of capacity-building and partnerships, focusing on how Angolan and Mozambican health sciences researchers experience international collaborations. Methods Semi-structured interviews were conducted with seven health academics, as well as a focus group discussion involving all participants. These were recorded, fully transcribed, anonymized and coded to identify common themes. A consent form was signed by all participants. Results and discussion UDI-A was considered innovative, fostering the improvement of pedagogical skills and increasing social entrepreneurship activities. Participants arrived with a specific institutional mandate and believed that the training received should be incorporated into institutional practices to “modernize” these specific Portuguese speaking African Universities and the health sector. The institutional mechanisms put in place to attain this goal, Centres for Academic Development and Innovation (“CADIs”), were considered potential research and development hubs and drivers of academic and societal transformation. Nevertheless, participants shared a sense of asymmetry (infrastructural, financial, in terms of access to information) between them and European trainers. Although this asymmetry was the underlying basis of this capacity-building project, they argued that UDI-A did not fully acknowledge their local contexts, compromising the prospective development of partnerships in the health field. Conclusions More attention should be devoted to understanding how participants experience capacity building processes, integrating the diversity of their aspirations and perceptions into subsequent phases of the project, requiring the development of methodological innovations to increase the impact of these programs.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T13:50:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-18d11719f6b149feab7d95af11e06225
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1744-8603
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T13:50:45Z
publishDate 2020-04-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Globalization and Health
spelling doaj.art-18d11719f6b149feab7d95af11e062252022-12-22T02:44:21ZengBMCGlobalization and Health1744-86032020-04-0116111010.1186/s12992-020-00562-7“Get us partnerships!” - a qualitative study of Angolan and Mozambican health academics’ experiences with North/South partnershipsIsabel Craveiro0António Carvalho1Paulo Ferrinho2Global Health and Tropical Medicine, GHTM, Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical, IHMT, Universidade Nova de LisboaGlobal Health and Tropical Medicine, GHTM, Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical, IHMT, Universidade Nova de LisboaGlobal Health and Tropical Medicine, GHTM, Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical, IHMT, Universidade Nova de LisboaAbstract Background Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 17 focuses on North/South partnerships for sustainable development. Literature on research partnerships and capacity -building often neglects how these processes are carried out in practice, their social impacts and participants’ subjective experiences. Recognizing the increasingly global dimensions of Higher Education Institutions, the University Development and Innovation – Africa project (UDI-A) was designed to train lecturers and administrative staff of Angolan and Mozambican Universities through collaborations with European institutions, aiming at strengthening African academic and social landscapes through knowledge translation and dissemination. This paper examines potential outcomes of UDI-A on participants’ academic pathways, investigating the conflict between different imaginaries of capacity-building and partnerships, focusing on how Angolan and Mozambican health sciences researchers experience international collaborations. Methods Semi-structured interviews were conducted with seven health academics, as well as a focus group discussion involving all participants. These were recorded, fully transcribed, anonymized and coded to identify common themes. A consent form was signed by all participants. Results and discussion UDI-A was considered innovative, fostering the improvement of pedagogical skills and increasing social entrepreneurship activities. Participants arrived with a specific institutional mandate and believed that the training received should be incorporated into institutional practices to “modernize” these specific Portuguese speaking African Universities and the health sector. The institutional mechanisms put in place to attain this goal, Centres for Academic Development and Innovation (“CADIs”), were considered potential research and development hubs and drivers of academic and societal transformation. Nevertheless, participants shared a sense of asymmetry (infrastructural, financial, in terms of access to information) between them and European trainers. Although this asymmetry was the underlying basis of this capacity-building project, they argued that UDI-A did not fully acknowledge their local contexts, compromising the prospective development of partnerships in the health field. Conclusions More attention should be devoted to understanding how participants experience capacity building processes, integrating the diversity of their aspirations and perceptions into subsequent phases of the project, requiring the development of methodological innovations to increase the impact of these programs.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12992-020-00562-7Research partnerships, capacity buildingAngolan and Mozambican health academicsAcademic developmentNorth/south collaboration
spellingShingle Isabel Craveiro
António Carvalho
Paulo Ferrinho
“Get us partnerships!” - a qualitative study of Angolan and Mozambican health academics’ experiences with North/South partnerships
Globalization and Health
Research partnerships, capacity building
Angolan and Mozambican health academics
Academic development
North/south collaboration
title “Get us partnerships!” - a qualitative study of Angolan and Mozambican health academics’ experiences with North/South partnerships
title_full “Get us partnerships!” - a qualitative study of Angolan and Mozambican health academics’ experiences with North/South partnerships
title_fullStr “Get us partnerships!” - a qualitative study of Angolan and Mozambican health academics’ experiences with North/South partnerships
title_full_unstemmed “Get us partnerships!” - a qualitative study of Angolan and Mozambican health academics’ experiences with North/South partnerships
title_short “Get us partnerships!” - a qualitative study of Angolan and Mozambican health academics’ experiences with North/South partnerships
title_sort get us partnerships a qualitative study of angolan and mozambican health academics experiences with north south partnerships
topic Research partnerships, capacity building
Angolan and Mozambican health academics
Academic development
North/south collaboration
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12992-020-00562-7
work_keys_str_mv AT isabelcraveiro getuspartnershipsaqualitativestudyofangolanandmozambicanhealthacademicsexperienceswithnorthsouthpartnerships
AT antoniocarvalho getuspartnershipsaqualitativestudyofangolanandmozambicanhealthacademicsexperienceswithnorthsouthpartnerships
AT pauloferrinho getuspartnershipsaqualitativestudyofangolanandmozambicanhealthacademicsexperienceswithnorthsouthpartnerships