Analysis of the poor-quality in building elements: providers' perspectives

Purpose – Poor quality in building projects is high and increasing. Poor quality can increase the cost of a building by up to more than 50% and can delay a project by up to 50%. This research investigated the poor quality of building elements/components. Design/methodology/approach – The site operat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: AbdulLateef Olanrewaju, Hui Jing Alice Lee
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Emerald Publishing 2022-04-01
Series:Frontiers in Engineering and Built Environment
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/FEBE-10-2021-0048/full/pdf
_version_ 1797786205604020224
author AbdulLateef Olanrewaju
Hui Jing Alice Lee
author_facet AbdulLateef Olanrewaju
Hui Jing Alice Lee
author_sort AbdulLateef Olanrewaju
collection DOAJ
description Purpose – Poor quality in building projects is high and increasing. Poor quality can increase the cost of a building by up to more than 50% and can delay a project by up to 50%. This research investigated the poor quality of building elements/components. Design/methodology/approach – The site operatives were requested to rate the frequency of poor quality in 25 building elements/components. The frequencies of the poor quality were scored on a five-point Likert scale, ranging from least often to extremely often. The survey forms were administered to construction site operatives by hand delivery. Findings – The data revealed that poor quality occurred in more than 80% of the building projects completed. Approximately 40% of the cost of a building project is attributed to poor quality. In total, 70% of the respondents measured the poor quality of building elements as being high and frequent. The size and frequency of poor quality are higher in concrete, plaster, brick, foundations and roof trusses. Practical implications – The research findings would help to reduce claims, disputes, maintenance costs and waste on sites. Originality/value – This research provides fresh information on poor quality in building projects and provides a systemic process for anticipating poor quality in building projects. The findings also provide an option to increase maintenance span and a means to reduce claims and disputes in the construction sector.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T01:04:36Z
format Article
id doaj.art-18f492c3e83f4dc6b61e4fe047658ca2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2634-2499
2634-2502
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T01:04:36Z
publishDate 2022-04-01
publisher Emerald Publishing
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Engineering and Built Environment
spelling doaj.art-18f492c3e83f4dc6b61e4fe047658ca22023-07-06T07:19:51ZengEmerald PublishingFrontiers in Engineering and Built Environment2634-24992634-25022022-04-0122819410.1108/FEBE-10-2021-0048Analysis of the poor-quality in building elements: providers' perspectivesAbdulLateef Olanrewaju0Hui Jing Alice Lee1Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman (UTAR), Kampar, MalaysiaUniversiti Tunku Abdul Rahman (UTAR), Kampar, MalaysiaPurpose – Poor quality in building projects is high and increasing. Poor quality can increase the cost of a building by up to more than 50% and can delay a project by up to 50%. This research investigated the poor quality of building elements/components. Design/methodology/approach – The site operatives were requested to rate the frequency of poor quality in 25 building elements/components. The frequencies of the poor quality were scored on a five-point Likert scale, ranging from least often to extremely often. The survey forms were administered to construction site operatives by hand delivery. Findings – The data revealed that poor quality occurred in more than 80% of the building projects completed. Approximately 40% of the cost of a building project is attributed to poor quality. In total, 70% of the respondents measured the poor quality of building elements as being high and frequent. The size and frequency of poor quality are higher in concrete, plaster, brick, foundations and roof trusses. Practical implications – The research findings would help to reduce claims, disputes, maintenance costs and waste on sites. Originality/value – This research provides fresh information on poor quality in building projects and provides a systemic process for anticipating poor quality in building projects. The findings also provide an option to increase maintenance span and a means to reduce claims and disputes in the construction sector.https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/FEBE-10-2021-0048/full/pdfReworkContractorsMaintenance-spanBuilding performanceSite operatives
spellingShingle AbdulLateef Olanrewaju
Hui Jing Alice Lee
Analysis of the poor-quality in building elements: providers' perspectives
Frontiers in Engineering and Built Environment
Rework
Contractors
Maintenance-span
Building performance
Site operatives
title Analysis of the poor-quality in building elements: providers' perspectives
title_full Analysis of the poor-quality in building elements: providers' perspectives
title_fullStr Analysis of the poor-quality in building elements: providers' perspectives
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of the poor-quality in building elements: providers' perspectives
title_short Analysis of the poor-quality in building elements: providers' perspectives
title_sort analysis of the poor quality in building elements providers perspectives
topic Rework
Contractors
Maintenance-span
Building performance
Site operatives
url https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/FEBE-10-2021-0048/full/pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT abdullateefolanrewaju analysisofthepoorqualityinbuildingelementsprovidersperspectives
AT huijingalicelee analysisofthepoorqualityinbuildingelementsprovidersperspectives