Imagery ability of elite level athletes from individual vs. team and contact vs. no-contact sports

Background In the sport context, imagery has been described as the condition in which persons imagine themselves while executing skills to deal with the upcoming task or enhance performance. Systematic reviews have shown that mental imagery improves performance in motor tasks Methods The aim of the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Donatella Di Corrado, Maria Guarnera, Francesca Vitali, Alessandro Quartiroli, Marinella Coco
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PeerJ Inc. 2019-05-01
Series:PeerJ
Subjects:
Online Access:https://peerj.com/articles/6940.pdf
_version_ 1797425657110593536
author Donatella Di Corrado
Maria Guarnera
Francesca Vitali
Alessandro Quartiroli
Marinella Coco
author_facet Donatella Di Corrado
Maria Guarnera
Francesca Vitali
Alessandro Quartiroli
Marinella Coco
author_sort Donatella Di Corrado
collection DOAJ
description Background In the sport context, imagery has been described as the condition in which persons imagine themselves while executing skills to deal with the upcoming task or enhance performance. Systematic reviews have shown that mental imagery improves performance in motor tasks Methods The aim of the present study was to explore whether imagery vividness (i.e., the clarity or realism of the imagery experience) and controllability (i.e., the ease and accuracy with which an image can be manipulated mentally) differ by sport types (team vs. individual and contact vs. non-contact). Participants were athletes from team contact and non-contact sports (rugby and volleyball, respectively), and individual contact and non-contact sports (karate and tennis, respectively) between the ages of 20 and 33 years (M = 24.37, SD = 2.85). The participants completed the Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire, the Vividness of Movement Imagery Questionnaire-2, and the Mental Image Transformation Tasks. Results A 2 ×2 × 2 (gender × 2 contact-no-contact × 2 sport type) between groups MANOVA showed differences in imagery ability by sport type. Practical indications deriving from the findings of this study can help coaches and athletes to develop mental preparation programs using sport-specific imagery.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T08:19:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-18fc9dd1b37c42018083c38fa0c55175
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2167-8359
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T08:19:15Z
publishDate 2019-05-01
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format Article
series PeerJ
spelling doaj.art-18fc9dd1b37c42018083c38fa0c551752023-12-02T21:53:51ZengPeerJ Inc.PeerJ2167-83592019-05-017e694010.7717/peerj.6940Imagery ability of elite level athletes from individual vs. team and contact vs. no-contact sportsDonatella Di Corrado0Maria Guarnera1Francesca Vitali2Alessandro Quartiroli3Marinella Coco4Department of Sport Sciences, Kore University, Enna, ItalyDepartment of Psychology, Kore University, Enna, ItalyDepartment of Neurosciences, Biomedicine, and Movement, University of Verona, Verona, ItalyDepartment of Psychology, University of Wisconsin, Wisconsin, United States of AmericaDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, Catania, ItalyBackground In the sport context, imagery has been described as the condition in which persons imagine themselves while executing skills to deal with the upcoming task or enhance performance. Systematic reviews have shown that mental imagery improves performance in motor tasks Methods The aim of the present study was to explore whether imagery vividness (i.e., the clarity or realism of the imagery experience) and controllability (i.e., the ease and accuracy with which an image can be manipulated mentally) differ by sport types (team vs. individual and contact vs. non-contact). Participants were athletes from team contact and non-contact sports (rugby and volleyball, respectively), and individual contact and non-contact sports (karate and tennis, respectively) between the ages of 20 and 33 years (M = 24.37, SD = 2.85). The participants completed the Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire, the Vividness of Movement Imagery Questionnaire-2, and the Mental Image Transformation Tasks. Results A 2 ×2 × 2 (gender × 2 contact-no-contact × 2 sport type) between groups MANOVA showed differences in imagery ability by sport type. Practical indications deriving from the findings of this study can help coaches and athletes to develop mental preparation programs using sport-specific imagery.https://peerj.com/articles/6940.pdfSportImagery vividnessImagery controllability
spellingShingle Donatella Di Corrado
Maria Guarnera
Francesca Vitali
Alessandro Quartiroli
Marinella Coco
Imagery ability of elite level athletes from individual vs. team and contact vs. no-contact sports
PeerJ
Sport
Imagery vividness
Imagery controllability
title Imagery ability of elite level athletes from individual vs. team and contact vs. no-contact sports
title_full Imagery ability of elite level athletes from individual vs. team and contact vs. no-contact sports
title_fullStr Imagery ability of elite level athletes from individual vs. team and contact vs. no-contact sports
title_full_unstemmed Imagery ability of elite level athletes from individual vs. team and contact vs. no-contact sports
title_short Imagery ability of elite level athletes from individual vs. team and contact vs. no-contact sports
title_sort imagery ability of elite level athletes from individual vs team and contact vs no contact sports
topic Sport
Imagery vividness
Imagery controllability
url https://peerj.com/articles/6940.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT donatelladicorrado imageryabilityofelitelevelathletesfromindividualvsteamandcontactvsnocontactsports
AT mariaguarnera imageryabilityofelitelevelathletesfromindividualvsteamandcontactvsnocontactsports
AT francescavitali imageryabilityofelitelevelathletesfromindividualvsteamandcontactvsnocontactsports
AT alessandroquartiroli imageryabilityofelitelevelathletesfromindividualvsteamandcontactvsnocontactsports
AT marinellacoco imageryabilityofelitelevelathletesfromindividualvsteamandcontactvsnocontactsports