Will an app-based reading intervention change how teachers rate their teaching self-efficacy beliefs? A test of social cognitive theory in Swedish special educational settings

Educational researchers have challenged Bandura’s prediction that self-efficacy beliefs tend to be established early in learning and that once set, self-efficacy beliefs persist unless a critical event causes them to be reevaluated. However, the results have been mixed in previous research, includin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Monica Reichenberg, Gunilla Thunberg, Emil Holmer, Lisa Palmqvist, Jenny Samuelsson, Mats Lundälv, Katarina Mühlenbock, Mikael Heimann
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Education
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2023.1184719/full
_version_ 1797754351400255488
author Monica Reichenberg
Gunilla Thunberg
Gunilla Thunberg
Emil Holmer
Lisa Palmqvist
Lisa Palmqvist
Jenny Samuelsson
Mats Lundälv
Katarina Mühlenbock
Mikael Heimann
author_facet Monica Reichenberg
Gunilla Thunberg
Gunilla Thunberg
Emil Holmer
Lisa Palmqvist
Lisa Palmqvist
Jenny Samuelsson
Mats Lundälv
Katarina Mühlenbock
Mikael Heimann
author_sort Monica Reichenberg
collection DOAJ
description Educational researchers have challenged Bandura’s prediction that self-efficacy beliefs tend to be established early in learning and that once set, self-efficacy beliefs persist unless a critical event causes them to be reevaluated. However, the results have been mixed in previous research, including being positive, negative, and unchanged. In response, we evaluated how 75 teachers (i.e., special educators) rate their teaching self-efficacy beliefs in motivating student reading and adapting reading instruction at two time points. All teachers taught students with an intellectual disability, communication difficulties, and poor reading skills. The teachers participated in a workshop to learn teaching reading strategies with apps under various conditions (comprehension strategies, phonemic strategies, or both comprehension and phonemic strategies). We analyzed teacher self-efficacy beliefs at two time points with a 12-week span (pre-and postintervention). First, we developed measures of teacher self-efficacy through confirmatory factor analyses. Next, we analyzed the data with multiple imputation and mixed linear regression with difference-in-differences (DiD). The results indicated no statistically significant treatment effect on teachers’ rating of their teaching self-efficacy beliefs. We conclude that our results agree with Bandura’s original prediction and thus, his social cognitive theory.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T17:31:16Z
format Article
id doaj.art-18fd889164c74005811b916f3cd095d2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2504-284X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T17:31:16Z
publishDate 2023-08-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Education
spelling doaj.art-18fd889164c74005811b916f3cd095d22023-08-04T17:30:24ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Education2504-284X2023-08-01810.3389/feduc.2023.11847191184719Will an app-based reading intervention change how teachers rate their teaching self-efficacy beliefs? A test of social cognitive theory in Swedish special educational settingsMonica Reichenberg0Gunilla Thunberg1Gunilla Thunberg2Emil Holmer3Lisa Palmqvist4Lisa Palmqvist5Jenny Samuelsson6Mats Lundälv7Katarina Mühlenbock8Mikael Heimann9Department of Education and Special Education, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, SwedenDart Centre for Augmentative and Alternative Communication and Assistive Technology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, SwedenSpeech and Language Pathology Unit, Department of Health and Rehabilitation, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, SwedenDepartment of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Linköping University, Linköping, SwedenDepartment of Education and Special Education, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, SwedenDepartment of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Linköping University, Linköping, SwedenSpeech and Language Pathology Unit, Department of Health and Rehabilitation, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, SwedenDart Centre for Augmentative and Alternative Communication and Assistive Technology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, SwedenDart Centre for Augmentative and Alternative Communication and Assistive Technology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, SwedenDepartment of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Linköping University, Linköping, SwedenEducational researchers have challenged Bandura’s prediction that self-efficacy beliefs tend to be established early in learning and that once set, self-efficacy beliefs persist unless a critical event causes them to be reevaluated. However, the results have been mixed in previous research, including being positive, negative, and unchanged. In response, we evaluated how 75 teachers (i.e., special educators) rate their teaching self-efficacy beliefs in motivating student reading and adapting reading instruction at two time points. All teachers taught students with an intellectual disability, communication difficulties, and poor reading skills. The teachers participated in a workshop to learn teaching reading strategies with apps under various conditions (comprehension strategies, phonemic strategies, or both comprehension and phonemic strategies). We analyzed teacher self-efficacy beliefs at two time points with a 12-week span (pre-and postintervention). First, we developed measures of teacher self-efficacy through confirmatory factor analyses. Next, we analyzed the data with multiple imputation and mixed linear regression with difference-in-differences (DiD). The results indicated no statistically significant treatment effect on teachers’ rating of their teaching self-efficacy beliefs. We conclude that our results agree with Bandura’s original prediction and thus, his social cognitive theory.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2023.1184719/fullteacher self-efficacy beliefsreading researchspecial educationintellectual disabilitycomputer-assisted instructionsocial cognitive theory
spellingShingle Monica Reichenberg
Gunilla Thunberg
Gunilla Thunberg
Emil Holmer
Lisa Palmqvist
Lisa Palmqvist
Jenny Samuelsson
Mats Lundälv
Katarina Mühlenbock
Mikael Heimann
Will an app-based reading intervention change how teachers rate their teaching self-efficacy beliefs? A test of social cognitive theory in Swedish special educational settings
Frontiers in Education
teacher self-efficacy beliefs
reading research
special education
intellectual disability
computer-assisted instruction
social cognitive theory
title Will an app-based reading intervention change how teachers rate their teaching self-efficacy beliefs? A test of social cognitive theory in Swedish special educational settings
title_full Will an app-based reading intervention change how teachers rate their teaching self-efficacy beliefs? A test of social cognitive theory in Swedish special educational settings
title_fullStr Will an app-based reading intervention change how teachers rate their teaching self-efficacy beliefs? A test of social cognitive theory in Swedish special educational settings
title_full_unstemmed Will an app-based reading intervention change how teachers rate their teaching self-efficacy beliefs? A test of social cognitive theory in Swedish special educational settings
title_short Will an app-based reading intervention change how teachers rate their teaching self-efficacy beliefs? A test of social cognitive theory in Swedish special educational settings
title_sort will an app based reading intervention change how teachers rate their teaching self efficacy beliefs a test of social cognitive theory in swedish special educational settings
topic teacher self-efficacy beliefs
reading research
special education
intellectual disability
computer-assisted instruction
social cognitive theory
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2023.1184719/full
work_keys_str_mv AT monicareichenberg willanappbasedreadinginterventionchangehowteachersratetheirteachingselfefficacybeliefsatestofsocialcognitivetheoryinswedishspecialeducationalsettings
AT gunillathunberg willanappbasedreadinginterventionchangehowteachersratetheirteachingselfefficacybeliefsatestofsocialcognitivetheoryinswedishspecialeducationalsettings
AT gunillathunberg willanappbasedreadinginterventionchangehowteachersratetheirteachingselfefficacybeliefsatestofsocialcognitivetheoryinswedishspecialeducationalsettings
AT emilholmer willanappbasedreadinginterventionchangehowteachersratetheirteachingselfefficacybeliefsatestofsocialcognitivetheoryinswedishspecialeducationalsettings
AT lisapalmqvist willanappbasedreadinginterventionchangehowteachersratetheirteachingselfefficacybeliefsatestofsocialcognitivetheoryinswedishspecialeducationalsettings
AT lisapalmqvist willanappbasedreadinginterventionchangehowteachersratetheirteachingselfefficacybeliefsatestofsocialcognitivetheoryinswedishspecialeducationalsettings
AT jennysamuelsson willanappbasedreadinginterventionchangehowteachersratetheirteachingselfefficacybeliefsatestofsocialcognitivetheoryinswedishspecialeducationalsettings
AT matslundalv willanappbasedreadinginterventionchangehowteachersratetheirteachingselfefficacybeliefsatestofsocialcognitivetheoryinswedishspecialeducationalsettings
AT katarinamuhlenbock willanappbasedreadinginterventionchangehowteachersratetheirteachingselfefficacybeliefsatestofsocialcognitivetheoryinswedishspecialeducationalsettings
AT mikaelheimann willanappbasedreadinginterventionchangehowteachersratetheirteachingselfefficacybeliefsatestofsocialcognitivetheoryinswedishspecialeducationalsettings