Complication with Intraosseous Access: Scandinavian Users' Experience

Introduction: Intraosseous access (IO) is indicated if vascular access cannot be quickly established during resuscitation. Complication rates are estimated to be low, based on small patient series, model or cadaver studies, and case reports. However, user experience with IO use in real-life emergenc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Peter Hallas, Mikkel Brabrand, Lars Folkestad
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: eScholarship Publishing, University of California 2013-09-01
Series:Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://escholarship.org/uc/item/6js6w38r#
_version_ 1819171279410823168
author Peter Hallas
Mikkel Brabrand
Lars Folkestad
author_facet Peter Hallas
Mikkel Brabrand
Lars Folkestad
author_sort Peter Hallas
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Intraosseous access (IO) is indicated if vascular access cannot be quickly established during resuscitation. Complication rates are estimated to be low, based on small patient series, model or cadaver studies, and case reports. However, user experience with IO use in real-life emergency situations might differ from the results in the controlled environment of model studies and small patient series. We performed a survey of IO use in real-life emergency situations to assess users’ experiences of complications.Methods: An online questionnaire was sent to Scandinavian emergency physicians, anesthesiologists and pediatricians.Results: 1,802 clinical cases of IO use was reported by n=386 responders. Commonly reported complications with establishing IO access were patient discomfort/pain (7.1%), difficulties with penetration of periosteum with IO needle (10.3%), difficulties with aspiration of bone marrow (12.3%), and bended/broken needle (4.0%). When using an established IO access the reported complications were difficulties with injection fluid and drugs after IO insertion (7.4%), slow infusion (despite use of pressure bag) (8.8%), displacement after insertion (8.5%), and extravasation (3.7%). Compartment syndrome and osteomyelitis occurred in 0.6% and 0.4% of cases respectively.Conclusion: In users’ recollection of real-life IO use, perceived complications were more frequent than usually reported from model studies. The perceived difficulties with using IO could affect the willingness of medical staff to use IO. Therefore, user experience should be addressed both in education of how to use, and research and development of IOs. [West J Emerg Med. 2013;14(5):440–443.]
first_indexed 2024-12-22T19:48:46Z
format Article
id doaj.art-190b15db497a41e3b597b5158893d426
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1936-900X
1936-9018
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T19:48:46Z
publishDate 2013-09-01
publisher eScholarship Publishing, University of California
record_format Article
series Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
spelling doaj.art-190b15db497a41e3b597b5158893d4262022-12-21T18:14:37ZengeScholarship Publishing, University of CaliforniaWestern Journal of Emergency Medicine1936-900X1936-90182013-09-0114544044310.5811/westjem.2013.1.12000Complication with Intraosseous Access: Scandinavian Users' ExperiencePeter HallasMikkel BrabrandLars FolkestadIntroduction: Intraosseous access (IO) is indicated if vascular access cannot be quickly established during resuscitation. Complication rates are estimated to be low, based on small patient series, model or cadaver studies, and case reports. However, user experience with IO use in real-life emergency situations might differ from the results in the controlled environment of model studies and small patient series. We performed a survey of IO use in real-life emergency situations to assess users’ experiences of complications.Methods: An online questionnaire was sent to Scandinavian emergency physicians, anesthesiologists and pediatricians.Results: 1,802 clinical cases of IO use was reported by n=386 responders. Commonly reported complications with establishing IO access were patient discomfort/pain (7.1%), difficulties with penetration of periosteum with IO needle (10.3%), difficulties with aspiration of bone marrow (12.3%), and bended/broken needle (4.0%). When using an established IO access the reported complications were difficulties with injection fluid and drugs after IO insertion (7.4%), slow infusion (despite use of pressure bag) (8.8%), displacement after insertion (8.5%), and extravasation (3.7%). Compartment syndrome and osteomyelitis occurred in 0.6% and 0.4% of cases respectively.Conclusion: In users’ recollection of real-life IO use, perceived complications were more frequent than usually reported from model studies. The perceived difficulties with using IO could affect the willingness of medical staff to use IO. Therefore, user experience should be addressed both in education of how to use, and research and development of IOs. [West J Emerg Med. 2013;14(5):440–443.]http://escholarship.org/uc/item/6js6w38r#resuscitationintraosseous accesspediatricprocedurecomplicationmedicine
spellingShingle Peter Hallas
Mikkel Brabrand
Lars Folkestad
Complication with Intraosseous Access: Scandinavian Users' Experience
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
resuscitation
intraosseous access
pediatric
procedure
complication
medicine
title Complication with Intraosseous Access: Scandinavian Users' Experience
title_full Complication with Intraosseous Access: Scandinavian Users' Experience
title_fullStr Complication with Intraosseous Access: Scandinavian Users' Experience
title_full_unstemmed Complication with Intraosseous Access: Scandinavian Users' Experience
title_short Complication with Intraosseous Access: Scandinavian Users' Experience
title_sort complication with intraosseous access scandinavian users experience
topic resuscitation
intraosseous access
pediatric
procedure
complication
medicine
url http://escholarship.org/uc/item/6js6w38r#
work_keys_str_mv AT peterhallas complicationwithintraosseousaccessscandinavianusersexperience
AT mikkelbrabrand complicationwithintraosseousaccessscandinavianusersexperience
AT larsfolkestad complicationwithintraosseousaccessscandinavianusersexperience