Threat reversal learning and avoidance habits in generalised anxiety disorder

Abstract Avoidance and heightened responses to perceived threats are key features of anxiety disorders. These disorders are characterised by inflexibility in dynamically updating behavioural and physiological responses to aversively conditioned cues or environmental contexts which are no longer obje...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Clark Roberts, Annemieke M. Apergis-Schoute, Annette Bruhl, Magda Nowak, David S. Baldwin, Barbara J. Sahakian, Trevor W. Robbins
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Publishing Group 2022-05-01
Series:Translational Psychiatry
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-022-01981-3
_version_ 1828783363512598528
author Clark Roberts
Annemieke M. Apergis-Schoute
Annette Bruhl
Magda Nowak
David S. Baldwin
Barbara J. Sahakian
Trevor W. Robbins
author_facet Clark Roberts
Annemieke M. Apergis-Schoute
Annette Bruhl
Magda Nowak
David S. Baldwin
Barbara J. Sahakian
Trevor W. Robbins
author_sort Clark Roberts
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Avoidance and heightened responses to perceived threats are key features of anxiety disorders. These disorders are characterised by inflexibility in dynamically updating behavioural and physiological responses to aversively conditioned cues or environmental contexts which are no longer objectively threatening, often manifesting in perseverative avoidance. However, less is known about how anxiety disorders might differ in adjusting to threat and safety shifts in the environment or how idiosyncratic avoidance responses are learned and persist. Twenty-eight patients with generalised anxiety disorder (GAD), without DSM co-morbidities, and 27 matched healthy controls were administered two previously established paradigms: Pavlovian threat reversal and shock avoidance habits through overtraining (assessed following devaluation with measures of perseverative responding). For both tasks we used subjective report scales and skin conductance responses (SCR). In the Pavlovian threat reversal task, patients with GAD showed a significantly overall higher SCR as well as a reduced differential SCR response compared to controls in the early but not late reversal phase. During the test of habitual avoidance responding, GAD patients did not differ from controls in task performance, habitual active avoidance responses during devaluation, or corresponding SCR during trials, but showed a trend toward more abstract confirmatory subjective justifications for continued avoidance following the task. GAD patients exhibited significantly greater skin conductance responses to signals of threat than controls, but did not exhibit the major deficits in reversal and safety signal learning shown previously by patients with OCD. Moreover, this patient group, again unlike OCD patients, did not show evidence of altered active avoidance learning or enhanced instrumental avoidance habits. Overall, these findings indicate no deficits in instrumental active avoidance or persistent avoidance habits, despite enhanced responses to Pavlovian threat cues in GAD. They suggest that GAD is characterised by passive, and not excessively rigid, avoidance styles.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T18:03:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-19108da3d90940e89bcfd6c0888221e1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2158-3188
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T18:03:45Z
publishDate 2022-05-01
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format Article
series Translational Psychiatry
spelling doaj.art-19108da3d90940e89bcfd6c0888221e12022-12-22T00:55:48ZengNature Publishing GroupTranslational Psychiatry2158-31882022-05-011211710.1038/s41398-022-01981-3Threat reversal learning and avoidance habits in generalised anxiety disorderClark Roberts0Annemieke M. Apergis-Schoute1Annette Bruhl2Magda Nowak3David S. Baldwin4Barbara J. Sahakian5Trevor W. Robbins6Department of Psychiatry, University of CambridgeDepartment of Psychology, University of CambridgeUniversity Hospital of ZurichClinical and Experimental Sciences (CNS and Psychiatry), Faculty of Medicine, University of SouthamptonClinical and Experimental Sciences (CNS and Psychiatry), Faculty of Medicine, University of SouthamptonDepartment of Psychiatry, University of CambridgeBehavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, University of CambridgeAbstract Avoidance and heightened responses to perceived threats are key features of anxiety disorders. These disorders are characterised by inflexibility in dynamically updating behavioural and physiological responses to aversively conditioned cues or environmental contexts which are no longer objectively threatening, often manifesting in perseverative avoidance. However, less is known about how anxiety disorders might differ in adjusting to threat and safety shifts in the environment or how idiosyncratic avoidance responses are learned and persist. Twenty-eight patients with generalised anxiety disorder (GAD), without DSM co-morbidities, and 27 matched healthy controls were administered two previously established paradigms: Pavlovian threat reversal and shock avoidance habits through overtraining (assessed following devaluation with measures of perseverative responding). For both tasks we used subjective report scales and skin conductance responses (SCR). In the Pavlovian threat reversal task, patients with GAD showed a significantly overall higher SCR as well as a reduced differential SCR response compared to controls in the early but not late reversal phase. During the test of habitual avoidance responding, GAD patients did not differ from controls in task performance, habitual active avoidance responses during devaluation, or corresponding SCR during trials, but showed a trend toward more abstract confirmatory subjective justifications for continued avoidance following the task. GAD patients exhibited significantly greater skin conductance responses to signals of threat than controls, but did not exhibit the major deficits in reversal and safety signal learning shown previously by patients with OCD. Moreover, this patient group, again unlike OCD patients, did not show evidence of altered active avoidance learning or enhanced instrumental avoidance habits. Overall, these findings indicate no deficits in instrumental active avoidance or persistent avoidance habits, despite enhanced responses to Pavlovian threat cues in GAD. They suggest that GAD is characterised by passive, and not excessively rigid, avoidance styles.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-022-01981-3
spellingShingle Clark Roberts
Annemieke M. Apergis-Schoute
Annette Bruhl
Magda Nowak
David S. Baldwin
Barbara J. Sahakian
Trevor W. Robbins
Threat reversal learning and avoidance habits in generalised anxiety disorder
Translational Psychiatry
title Threat reversal learning and avoidance habits in generalised anxiety disorder
title_full Threat reversal learning and avoidance habits in generalised anxiety disorder
title_fullStr Threat reversal learning and avoidance habits in generalised anxiety disorder
title_full_unstemmed Threat reversal learning and avoidance habits in generalised anxiety disorder
title_short Threat reversal learning and avoidance habits in generalised anxiety disorder
title_sort threat reversal learning and avoidance habits in generalised anxiety disorder
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-022-01981-3
work_keys_str_mv AT clarkroberts threatreversallearningandavoidancehabitsingeneralisedanxietydisorder
AT annemiekemapergisschoute threatreversallearningandavoidancehabitsingeneralisedanxietydisorder
AT annettebruhl threatreversallearningandavoidancehabitsingeneralisedanxietydisorder
AT magdanowak threatreversallearningandavoidancehabitsingeneralisedanxietydisorder
AT davidsbaldwin threatreversallearningandavoidancehabitsingeneralisedanxietydisorder
AT barbarajsahakian threatreversallearningandavoidancehabitsingeneralisedanxietydisorder
AT trevorwrobbins threatreversallearningandavoidancehabitsingeneralisedanxietydisorder