Responders and nonresponders after catheter ablation procedure and antiarrhythmic drug therapy in patients with paroxysmal AF: data from implantable cardiac monitors
<p><strong>Aim.</strong> The aim of this study was to assess the number of responders and nonresponders after catheter ablation procedure and antiarrhythmic drug therapy (AAD) in patients with paroxysmal AF through implantable cardiac monitors (ICM). <br /><strong>Metho...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Meshalkin National Medical Research Center
2016-11-01
|
Series: | Патология кровообращения и кардиохирургия |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journalmeshalkin.ru/index.php/heartjournal/article/view/333 |
_version_ | 1797717727333318656 |
---|---|
author | А. А. Симонян В. Н. Колесников Л. И. Виленский Ю. С. Кривошеев Д. И. Башта М. Ю. Гатило Т. А. Мызникова З. А. Мисходжева |
author_facet | А. А. Симонян В. Н. Колесников Л. И. Виленский Ю. С. Кривошеев Д. И. Башта М. Ю. Гатило Т. А. Мызникова З. А. Мисходжева |
author_sort | А. А. Симонян |
collection | DOAJ |
description | <p><strong>Aim.</strong> The aim of this study was to assess the number of responders and nonresponders after catheter ablation procedure and antiarrhythmic drug therapy (AAD) in patients with paroxysmal AF through implantable cardiac monitors (ICM). <br /><strong>Methods.</strong> 92 patients with paroxysmal AF were randomized into two groups: 1) AAD + ICM implantation (group I; n=46), and 2) AF catheter ablation (CA) + ICM implantation (group II; n=46), and 2). Patients with an AF% < 0.5% were considered AF-free (responders). Patients with AF% > 0.5% were classified as nonresponders. The follow up of this study was 24 months.<br /><strong>Results.</strong> At the end of the follow-up period 13 (28.3%) patients in AAD group and 29 (63 %) patients in CA group were responders (log-rank test; р=0.0009; HR 2,6; 95% CI [1.44-4.69], р=0.001, Cox regression). According to multivariate logistic regression analysis data, AF burden>4.5% during the first two months after treatment (odds ratio [OR]=38,9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 6.2–245; P<0.001), arterial hypertension (OR=12.7; 95% CI, 1.9–85.3; P=0.009) and AF duration more than 5 years (OR=8.5; 95% CI, 1.04–69.6; P=0.044) were independent predictors of AF burden progression <br /><strong>Conclusion.</strong> According to implantable cardiac monitors data, <br />in patients with paroxysmal AF radiofrequency catheter ablation as compared to antiarrhythmic drug therapy results in higher percentage of responders.</p><p>Received 10 July 2016. Accepted 22 August 2016.</p><p><strong>Funding:</strong> The study had no sponsorship. <br /><strong>Conflict of interest:</strong> The authors declare no conflict of interest.</p> |
first_indexed | 2024-03-12T08:40:28Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-19190aa7331444dca8cd05787c405076 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1681-3472 2500-3119 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-12T08:40:28Z |
publishDate | 2016-11-01 |
publisher | Meshalkin National Medical Research Center |
record_format | Article |
series | Патология кровообращения и кардиохирургия |
spelling | doaj.art-19190aa7331444dca8cd05787c4050762023-09-02T16:49:44ZengMeshalkin National Medical Research CenterПатология кровообращения и кардиохирургия1681-34722500-31192016-11-01203828910.21688/1681-3472-2016-3-82-891047Responders and nonresponders after catheter ablation procedure and antiarrhythmic drug therapy in patients with paroxysmal AF: data from implantable cardiac monitorsА. А. Симонян0В. Н. Колесников1Л. И. Виленский2Ю. С. КривошеевД. И. Башта3М. Ю. Гатило4Т. А. Мызникова5З. А. Мисходжева6Краевой клинический кардиологический диспансер, 355026, Ставрополь, Российская ФедерацияКраевой клинический кардиологический диспансер, 355026, Ставрополь, Российская ФедерацияКраевой клинический кардиологический диспансер, 355026, Ставрополь, Российская ФедерацияКраевой клинический кардиологический диспансер, 355026, Ставрополь, Российская ФедерацияКраевой клинический кардиологический диспансер, 355026, Ставрополь, Российская ФедерацияКраевой клинический кардиологический диспансер, 355026, Ставрополь, Российская ФедерацияКраевой клинический кардиологический диспансер, 355026, Ставрополь, Российская Федерация<p><strong>Aim.</strong> The aim of this study was to assess the number of responders and nonresponders after catheter ablation procedure and antiarrhythmic drug therapy (AAD) in patients with paroxysmal AF through implantable cardiac monitors (ICM). <br /><strong>Methods.</strong> 92 patients with paroxysmal AF were randomized into two groups: 1) AAD + ICM implantation (group I; n=46), and 2) AF catheter ablation (CA) + ICM implantation (group II; n=46), and 2). Patients with an AF% < 0.5% were considered AF-free (responders). Patients with AF% > 0.5% were classified as nonresponders. The follow up of this study was 24 months.<br /><strong>Results.</strong> At the end of the follow-up period 13 (28.3%) patients in AAD group and 29 (63 %) patients in CA group were responders (log-rank test; р=0.0009; HR 2,6; 95% CI [1.44-4.69], р=0.001, Cox regression). According to multivariate logistic regression analysis data, AF burden>4.5% during the first two months after treatment (odds ratio [OR]=38,9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 6.2–245; P<0.001), arterial hypertension (OR=12.7; 95% CI, 1.9–85.3; P=0.009) and AF duration more than 5 years (OR=8.5; 95% CI, 1.04–69.6; P=0.044) were independent predictors of AF burden progression <br /><strong>Conclusion.</strong> According to implantable cardiac monitors data, <br />in patients with paroxysmal AF radiofrequency catheter ablation as compared to antiarrhythmic drug therapy results in higher percentage of responders.</p><p>Received 10 July 2016. Accepted 22 August 2016.</p><p><strong>Funding:</strong> The study had no sponsorship. <br /><strong>Conflict of interest:</strong> The authors declare no conflict of interest.</p>http://journalmeshalkin.ru/index.php/heartjournal/article/view/333Пароксизмальная фибрилляция предсердий • Непрерывное мониторирование сердечного ритма • Радиочастотная изоляция устьев легочных вен • Антиаритмическая терапия • Респондеры |
spellingShingle | А. А. Симонян В. Н. Колесников Л. И. Виленский Ю. С. Кривошеев Д. И. Башта М. Ю. Гатило Т. А. Мызникова З. А. Мисходжева Responders and nonresponders after catheter ablation procedure and antiarrhythmic drug therapy in patients with paroxysmal AF: data from implantable cardiac monitors Патология кровообращения и кардиохирургия Пароксизмальная фибрилляция предсердий • Непрерывное мониторирование сердечного ритма • Радиочастотная изоляция устьев легочных вен • Антиаритмическая терапия • Респондеры |
title | Responders and nonresponders after catheter ablation procedure and antiarrhythmic drug therapy in patients with paroxysmal AF: data from implantable cardiac monitors |
title_full | Responders and nonresponders after catheter ablation procedure and antiarrhythmic drug therapy in patients with paroxysmal AF: data from implantable cardiac monitors |
title_fullStr | Responders and nonresponders after catheter ablation procedure and antiarrhythmic drug therapy in patients with paroxysmal AF: data from implantable cardiac monitors |
title_full_unstemmed | Responders and nonresponders after catheter ablation procedure and antiarrhythmic drug therapy in patients with paroxysmal AF: data from implantable cardiac monitors |
title_short | Responders and nonresponders after catheter ablation procedure and antiarrhythmic drug therapy in patients with paroxysmal AF: data from implantable cardiac monitors |
title_sort | responders and nonresponders after catheter ablation procedure and antiarrhythmic drug therapy in patients with paroxysmal af data from implantable cardiac monitors |
topic | Пароксизмальная фибрилляция предсердий • Непрерывное мониторирование сердечного ритма • Радиочастотная изоляция устьев легочных вен • Антиаритмическая терапия • Респондеры |
url | http://journalmeshalkin.ru/index.php/heartjournal/article/view/333 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aasimonân respondersandnonrespondersaftercatheterablationprocedureandantiarrhythmicdrugtherapyinpatientswithparoxysmalafdatafromimplantablecardiacmonitors AT vnkolesnikov respondersandnonrespondersaftercatheterablationprocedureandantiarrhythmicdrugtherapyinpatientswithparoxysmalafdatafromimplantablecardiacmonitors AT livilenskij respondersandnonrespondersaftercatheterablationprocedureandantiarrhythmicdrugtherapyinpatientswithparoxysmalafdatafromimplantablecardiacmonitors AT ûskrivošeev respondersandnonrespondersaftercatheterablationprocedureandantiarrhythmicdrugtherapyinpatientswithparoxysmalafdatafromimplantablecardiacmonitors AT dibašta respondersandnonrespondersaftercatheterablationprocedureandantiarrhythmicdrugtherapyinpatientswithparoxysmalafdatafromimplantablecardiacmonitors AT mûgatilo respondersandnonrespondersaftercatheterablationprocedureandantiarrhythmicdrugtherapyinpatientswithparoxysmalafdatafromimplantablecardiacmonitors AT tamyznikova respondersandnonrespondersaftercatheterablationprocedureandantiarrhythmicdrugtherapyinpatientswithparoxysmalafdatafromimplantablecardiacmonitors AT zamishodževa respondersandnonrespondersaftercatheterablationprocedureandantiarrhythmicdrugtherapyinpatientswithparoxysmalafdatafromimplantablecardiacmonitors |