Applicability Analysis of GF-2PMS and PLANETSCOPE Data for Ground Object Recognition in Karst Region

Remote sensing image with high spatial and temporal resolution is very important for rational planning and scientific management of land resources. However, due to the influence of satellite resolution, revisit period, and cloud pollution, it is difficult to obtain high spatial and temporal resoluti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yu Zhang, Chaoyong Shen, Shaoqi Zhou, Ruidong Yang, Xuling Luo, Guanglai Zhu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-12-01
Series:Land
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/1/33
_version_ 1797439961508610048
author Yu Zhang
Chaoyong Shen
Shaoqi Zhou
Ruidong Yang
Xuling Luo
Guanglai Zhu
author_facet Yu Zhang
Chaoyong Shen
Shaoqi Zhou
Ruidong Yang
Xuling Luo
Guanglai Zhu
author_sort Yu Zhang
collection DOAJ
description Remote sensing image with high spatial and temporal resolution is very important for rational planning and scientific management of land resources. However, due to the influence of satellite resolution, revisit period, and cloud pollution, it is difficult to obtain high spatial and temporal resolution images. In order to effectively solve the “space–time contradiction” problem in remote sensing application, based on GF-2PMS (GF-2) and PlanetSope (PS) data, this paper compares and analyzes the applicability of FSDAF (flexible spatiotemporal data fusion), STDFA (the spatial temporal data fusion approach), and Fit_FC (regression model fitting, spatial filtering, and residual compensation) in different terrain conditions in karst area. The results show the following. (1) For the boundary area of water and land, the FSDAF model has the best fusion effect in land boundary recognition, and provides rich ground object information. The Fit_FC model is less effective, and the image is blurry. (2) For areas such as mountains, with large changes in vegetation coverage, the spatial resolution of the images fused by the three models is significantly improved. Among them, the STDFA model has the clearest and richest spatial structure information. The fused image of the Fit_FC model has the highest similarity with the verification image, which can better restore the coverage changes of crops and other vegetation, but the actual spatial resolution of the fused image is relatively poor, the image quality is fuzzy, and the land boundary area cannot be clearly identified. (3) For areas with dense buildings, such as cities, the fusion image of the FSDAF and STDFA models is clearer and the Fit_FC model can better reflect the changes in land use. In summary, compared with the Fit_FC model, the FSDAF model and the STDFA model have higher image prediction accuracy, especially in the recognition of building contours and other surface features, but they are not suitable for the dynamic monitoring of vegetation such as crops. At the same time, the image resolution of the Fit_FC model after fusion is slightly lower than that of the other two models. In particular, in the water–land boundary area, the fusion accuracy is poor, but the model of Fit_FC has unique advantages in vegetation dynamic monitoring. In this paper, three spatiotemporal fusion models are used to fuse GF-2 and PS images, which improves the recognition accuracy of surface objects and provides a new idea for fine classification of land use in karst areas.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T12:01:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-191ef4b88ac7457db6e1ee0ec7a8dbfd
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2073-445X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T12:01:23Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Land
spelling doaj.art-191ef4b88ac7457db6e1ee0ec7a8dbfd2023-11-30T23:03:23ZengMDPI AGLand2073-445X2022-12-011213310.3390/land12010033Applicability Analysis of GF-2PMS and PLANETSCOPE Data for Ground Object Recognition in Karst RegionYu Zhang0Chaoyong Shen1Shaoqi Zhou2Ruidong Yang3Xuling Luo4Guanglai Zhu5College of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, ChinaCollege of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, ChinaCollege of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, ChinaCollege of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, ChinaThe Third Surveying and Mapping Institute of Guizhou Province, Guiyang 550004, ChinaCollege of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, ChinaRemote sensing image with high spatial and temporal resolution is very important for rational planning and scientific management of land resources. However, due to the influence of satellite resolution, revisit period, and cloud pollution, it is difficult to obtain high spatial and temporal resolution images. In order to effectively solve the “space–time contradiction” problem in remote sensing application, based on GF-2PMS (GF-2) and PlanetSope (PS) data, this paper compares and analyzes the applicability of FSDAF (flexible spatiotemporal data fusion), STDFA (the spatial temporal data fusion approach), and Fit_FC (regression model fitting, spatial filtering, and residual compensation) in different terrain conditions in karst area. The results show the following. (1) For the boundary area of water and land, the FSDAF model has the best fusion effect in land boundary recognition, and provides rich ground object information. The Fit_FC model is less effective, and the image is blurry. (2) For areas such as mountains, with large changes in vegetation coverage, the spatial resolution of the images fused by the three models is significantly improved. Among them, the STDFA model has the clearest and richest spatial structure information. The fused image of the Fit_FC model has the highest similarity with the verification image, which can better restore the coverage changes of crops and other vegetation, but the actual spatial resolution of the fused image is relatively poor, the image quality is fuzzy, and the land boundary area cannot be clearly identified. (3) For areas with dense buildings, such as cities, the fusion image of the FSDAF and STDFA models is clearer and the Fit_FC model can better reflect the changes in land use. In summary, compared with the Fit_FC model, the FSDAF model and the STDFA model have higher image prediction accuracy, especially in the recognition of building contours and other surface features, but they are not suitable for the dynamic monitoring of vegetation such as crops. At the same time, the image resolution of the Fit_FC model after fusion is slightly lower than that of the other two models. In particular, in the water–land boundary area, the fusion accuracy is poor, but the model of Fit_FC has unique advantages in vegetation dynamic monitoring. In this paper, three spatiotemporal fusion models are used to fuse GF-2 and PS images, which improves the recognition accuracy of surface objects and provides a new idea for fine classification of land use in karst areas.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/1/33spatiotemporal fusionland usehigh resolutionFSDAFSTDFAFit_FC
spellingShingle Yu Zhang
Chaoyong Shen
Shaoqi Zhou
Ruidong Yang
Xuling Luo
Guanglai Zhu
Applicability Analysis of GF-2PMS and PLANETSCOPE Data for Ground Object Recognition in Karst Region
Land
spatiotemporal fusion
land use
high resolution
FSDAF
STDFA
Fit_FC
title Applicability Analysis of GF-2PMS and PLANETSCOPE Data for Ground Object Recognition in Karst Region
title_full Applicability Analysis of GF-2PMS and PLANETSCOPE Data for Ground Object Recognition in Karst Region
title_fullStr Applicability Analysis of GF-2PMS and PLANETSCOPE Data for Ground Object Recognition in Karst Region
title_full_unstemmed Applicability Analysis of GF-2PMS and PLANETSCOPE Data for Ground Object Recognition in Karst Region
title_short Applicability Analysis of GF-2PMS and PLANETSCOPE Data for Ground Object Recognition in Karst Region
title_sort applicability analysis of gf 2pms and planetscope data for ground object recognition in karst region
topic spatiotemporal fusion
land use
high resolution
FSDAF
STDFA
Fit_FC
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/1/33
work_keys_str_mv AT yuzhang applicabilityanalysisofgf2pmsandplanetscopedataforgroundobjectrecognitioninkarstregion
AT chaoyongshen applicabilityanalysisofgf2pmsandplanetscopedataforgroundobjectrecognitioninkarstregion
AT shaoqizhou applicabilityanalysisofgf2pmsandplanetscopedataforgroundobjectrecognitioninkarstregion
AT ruidongyang applicabilityanalysisofgf2pmsandplanetscopedataforgroundobjectrecognitioninkarstregion
AT xulingluo applicabilityanalysisofgf2pmsandplanetscopedataforgroundobjectrecognitioninkarstregion
AT guanglaizhu applicabilityanalysisofgf2pmsandplanetscopedataforgroundobjectrecognitioninkarstregion