AR Signaling in Breast Cancer

Androgen receptor (AR, a member of the steroid hormone receptor family) status has become increasingly important as both a prognostic marker and potential therapeutic target in breast cancer. AR is expressed in up to 90% of estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer, and to a lesser degree, human...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bilal Rahim, Ruth O’Regan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2017-02-01
Series:Cancers
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/9/3/21
_version_ 1797713671069106176
author Bilal Rahim
Ruth O’Regan
author_facet Bilal Rahim
Ruth O’Regan
author_sort Bilal Rahim
collection DOAJ
description Androgen receptor (AR, a member of the steroid hormone receptor family) status has become increasingly important as both a prognostic marker and potential therapeutic target in breast cancer. AR is expressed in up to 90% of estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer, and to a lesser degree, human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) amplified tumors. In the former, AR signaling has been correlated with a better prognosis given its inhibitory activity in estrogen dependent disease, though conversely has also been shown to increase resistance to anti-estrogen therapies such as tamoxifen. AR blockade can mitigate this resistance, and thus serves as a potential target in ER-positive breast cancer. In HER2 amplified breast cancer, studies are somewhat conflicting, though most show either no effect or are associated with poorer survival. Much of the available data on AR signaling is in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), which is an aggressive disease with inferior outcomes comparative to other breast cancer subtypes. At present, there are no approved targeted therapies in TNBC, making study of the AR signaling pathway compelling. Gene expression profiling studies have also identified a luminal androgen receptor (LAR) subtype that is dependent on AR signaling in TNBC. Regardless, there seems to be an association between AR expression and improved outcomes in TNBC. Despite lower pathologic complete response (pCR) rates with neoadjuvant therapy, patients with AR-expressing TNBC have been shown to have a better prognosis than those that are AR-negative. Clinical studies targeting AR have shown somewhat promising results. In this paper we review the literature on the biology of AR in breast cancer and its prognostic and predictive roles. We also present our thoughts on therapeutic strategies.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T07:40:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1942622e904f47eaae31e8ed1ad5c177
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2072-6694
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T07:40:11Z
publishDate 2017-02-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Cancers
spelling doaj.art-1942622e904f47eaae31e8ed1ad5c1772023-09-02T21:19:35ZengMDPI AGCancers2072-66942017-02-01932110.3390/cancers9030021cancers9030021AR Signaling in Breast CancerBilal Rahim0Ruth O’Regan1Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology & Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI 53792, USADepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology & Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI 53792, USAAndrogen receptor (AR, a member of the steroid hormone receptor family) status has become increasingly important as both a prognostic marker and potential therapeutic target in breast cancer. AR is expressed in up to 90% of estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer, and to a lesser degree, human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) amplified tumors. In the former, AR signaling has been correlated with a better prognosis given its inhibitory activity in estrogen dependent disease, though conversely has also been shown to increase resistance to anti-estrogen therapies such as tamoxifen. AR blockade can mitigate this resistance, and thus serves as a potential target in ER-positive breast cancer. In HER2 amplified breast cancer, studies are somewhat conflicting, though most show either no effect or are associated with poorer survival. Much of the available data on AR signaling is in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), which is an aggressive disease with inferior outcomes comparative to other breast cancer subtypes. At present, there are no approved targeted therapies in TNBC, making study of the AR signaling pathway compelling. Gene expression profiling studies have also identified a luminal androgen receptor (LAR) subtype that is dependent on AR signaling in TNBC. Regardless, there seems to be an association between AR expression and improved outcomes in TNBC. Despite lower pathologic complete response (pCR) rates with neoadjuvant therapy, patients with AR-expressing TNBC have been shown to have a better prognosis than those that are AR-negative. Clinical studies targeting AR have shown somewhat promising results. In this paper we review the literature on the biology of AR in breast cancer and its prognostic and predictive roles. We also present our thoughts on therapeutic strategies.http://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/9/3/21AR signalingAR/PARP interplayAR/BET interplaybreast cancer
spellingShingle Bilal Rahim
Ruth O’Regan
AR Signaling in Breast Cancer
Cancers
AR signaling
AR/PARP interplay
AR/BET interplay
breast cancer
title AR Signaling in Breast Cancer
title_full AR Signaling in Breast Cancer
title_fullStr AR Signaling in Breast Cancer
title_full_unstemmed AR Signaling in Breast Cancer
title_short AR Signaling in Breast Cancer
title_sort ar signaling in breast cancer
topic AR signaling
AR/PARP interplay
AR/BET interplay
breast cancer
url http://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/9/3/21
work_keys_str_mv AT bilalrahim arsignalinginbreastcancer
AT ruthoregan arsignalinginbreastcancer