Pollinator Competition as a Driver of Floral Divergence: An Experimental Test.

Optimal foraging models of floral divergence predict that competition between two different types of pollinators will result in partitioning, increased assortative mating, and divergence of two floral phenotypes. We tested these predictions in a tropical plant-pollinator system using sexes of purple...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ethan J Temeles, Julia T Newman, Jennifer H Newman, Se Yeon Cho, Alexandra R Mazzotta, W John Kress
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2016-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4729399?pdf=render
_version_ 1817975560851161088
author Ethan J Temeles
Julia T Newman
Jennifer H Newman
Se Yeon Cho
Alexandra R Mazzotta
W John Kress
author_facet Ethan J Temeles
Julia T Newman
Jennifer H Newman
Se Yeon Cho
Alexandra R Mazzotta
W John Kress
author_sort Ethan J Temeles
collection DOAJ
description Optimal foraging models of floral divergence predict that competition between two different types of pollinators will result in partitioning, increased assortative mating, and divergence of two floral phenotypes. We tested these predictions in a tropical plant-pollinator system using sexes of purple-throated carib hummingbirds (Anthracothorax jugularis) as the pollinators, red and yellow inflorescence morphs of Heliconia caribaea as the plants, and fluorescent dyes as pollen analogs in an enclosed outdoor garden. When foraging alone, males exhibited a significant preference for the yellow morph of H. caribaea, whereas females exhibited no preference. In competition, males maintained their preference for the yellow morph and through aggression caused females to over-visit the red morph, resulting in resource partitioning. Competition significantly increased within-morph dye transfer (assortative mating) relative to non-competitive environments. Competition and partitioning of color morphs by sexes of purple-throated caribs also resulted in selection for floral divergence as measured by dye deposition on stigmas. Red and yellow morphs did not differ significantly in dye deposition in the competition trials, but differences in dye deposition and preferences for morphs when sexes of purple-throated caribs foraged alone implied fixation of one or the other color morph in the absence of competition. Competition also resulted in selection for divergence in corolla length, with the red morph experiencing directional selection for longer corollas and the yellow morph experiencing stabilizing selection on corolla length. Our results thus support predictions of foraging models of floral divergence and indicate that pollinator competition is a viable mechanism for divergence in floral traits of plants.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T21:51:33Z
format Article
id doaj.art-195288311ee340aa96aa6e7804a05a4c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T21:51:33Z
publishDate 2016-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-195288311ee340aa96aa6e7804a05a4c2022-12-22T02:28:24ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032016-01-01111e014643110.1371/journal.pone.0146431Pollinator Competition as a Driver of Floral Divergence: An Experimental Test.Ethan J TemelesJulia T NewmanJennifer H NewmanSe Yeon ChoAlexandra R MazzottaW John KressOptimal foraging models of floral divergence predict that competition between two different types of pollinators will result in partitioning, increased assortative mating, and divergence of two floral phenotypes. We tested these predictions in a tropical plant-pollinator system using sexes of purple-throated carib hummingbirds (Anthracothorax jugularis) as the pollinators, red and yellow inflorescence morphs of Heliconia caribaea as the plants, and fluorescent dyes as pollen analogs in an enclosed outdoor garden. When foraging alone, males exhibited a significant preference for the yellow morph of H. caribaea, whereas females exhibited no preference. In competition, males maintained their preference for the yellow morph and through aggression caused females to over-visit the red morph, resulting in resource partitioning. Competition significantly increased within-morph dye transfer (assortative mating) relative to non-competitive environments. Competition and partitioning of color morphs by sexes of purple-throated caribs also resulted in selection for floral divergence as measured by dye deposition on stigmas. Red and yellow morphs did not differ significantly in dye deposition in the competition trials, but differences in dye deposition and preferences for morphs when sexes of purple-throated caribs foraged alone implied fixation of one or the other color morph in the absence of competition. Competition also resulted in selection for divergence in corolla length, with the red morph experiencing directional selection for longer corollas and the yellow morph experiencing stabilizing selection on corolla length. Our results thus support predictions of foraging models of floral divergence and indicate that pollinator competition is a viable mechanism for divergence in floral traits of plants.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4729399?pdf=render
spellingShingle Ethan J Temeles
Julia T Newman
Jennifer H Newman
Se Yeon Cho
Alexandra R Mazzotta
W John Kress
Pollinator Competition as a Driver of Floral Divergence: An Experimental Test.
PLoS ONE
title Pollinator Competition as a Driver of Floral Divergence: An Experimental Test.
title_full Pollinator Competition as a Driver of Floral Divergence: An Experimental Test.
title_fullStr Pollinator Competition as a Driver of Floral Divergence: An Experimental Test.
title_full_unstemmed Pollinator Competition as a Driver of Floral Divergence: An Experimental Test.
title_short Pollinator Competition as a Driver of Floral Divergence: An Experimental Test.
title_sort pollinator competition as a driver of floral divergence an experimental test
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4729399?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT ethanjtemeles pollinatorcompetitionasadriveroffloraldivergenceanexperimentaltest
AT juliatnewman pollinatorcompetitionasadriveroffloraldivergenceanexperimentaltest
AT jenniferhnewman pollinatorcompetitionasadriveroffloraldivergenceanexperimentaltest
AT seyeoncho pollinatorcompetitionasadriveroffloraldivergenceanexperimentaltest
AT alexandrarmazzotta pollinatorcompetitionasadriveroffloraldivergenceanexperimentaltest
AT wjohnkress pollinatorcompetitionasadriveroffloraldivergenceanexperimentaltest