Do carrier expectations indicate industry structure in container shipping? An econometric analysis

Abstract In the competitive environment of liner shipping, the ability to nimbly adjust shipping capacity to demand could mean the difference between a thriving shipping operation and one that will most likely fail. How quickly and effectively carriers adjust their capacity may depend on how their e...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michael Fusillo, Hercules Haralambides
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2020-01-01
Series:Journal of Shipping and Trade
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s41072-019-0057-2
_version_ 1818595787368562688
author Michael Fusillo
Hercules Haralambides
author_facet Michael Fusillo
Hercules Haralambides
author_sort Michael Fusillo
collection DOAJ
description Abstract In the competitive environment of liner shipping, the ability to nimbly adjust shipping capacity to demand could mean the difference between a thriving shipping operation and one that will most likely fail. How quickly and effectively carriers adjust their capacity may depend on how their expectations regarding trade volumes and freight rates are formed. We find that if adaptive expectations prevail in the decision process, capacity deployment may suffer some degree of inertia but, compared to expectations that are formed rationally, capacity would be be relatively stable. On the other hand, if carrier expectations are rational, capacity deployment might be more likely to align closer and faster with demand. We seek to empirically test whether carriers’ expectations of demand, aiming at deploying the right amount of capacity, can be characterized as adaptive or rational. We find that a) in most cases, adaptive expectations is the paradigm in container shipping; b) the way expectations are formed and the market structure of the liner shipping industry are two things not totally unrelated; and c) rational expectations point to more competitive markets (such as that of the Pacific), while adaptive expectations indicate higher concentration and thus imperfect competition (as is the case in the North Atlantic). Our findings have important regulatory implications in the sense that, if one accepts, as we do, that adaptive expectations are consistent with concentrated industries, while rational expectations suggest more competition, then our paper suggests that the 2008 abolition of the liner conference system from European trades has failed to improve the level of competition in the Europe – US liner shipping markets.
first_indexed 2024-12-16T11:21:34Z
format Article
id doaj.art-195fa8135d83481e8c05995c29acb86b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2364-4575
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T11:21:34Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series Journal of Shipping and Trade
spelling doaj.art-195fa8135d83481e8c05995c29acb86b2022-12-21T22:33:28ZengSpringerOpenJournal of Shipping and Trade2364-45752020-01-015111610.1186/s41072-019-0057-2Do carrier expectations indicate industry structure in container shipping? An econometric analysisMichael Fusillo0Hercules Haralambides1Tufts UniversitySchool of Maritime Economics & Management, Dalian Maritime UniversityAbstract In the competitive environment of liner shipping, the ability to nimbly adjust shipping capacity to demand could mean the difference between a thriving shipping operation and one that will most likely fail. How quickly and effectively carriers adjust their capacity may depend on how their expectations regarding trade volumes and freight rates are formed. We find that if adaptive expectations prevail in the decision process, capacity deployment may suffer some degree of inertia but, compared to expectations that are formed rationally, capacity would be be relatively stable. On the other hand, if carrier expectations are rational, capacity deployment might be more likely to align closer and faster with demand. We seek to empirically test whether carriers’ expectations of demand, aiming at deploying the right amount of capacity, can be characterized as adaptive or rational. We find that a) in most cases, adaptive expectations is the paradigm in container shipping; b) the way expectations are formed and the market structure of the liner shipping industry are two things not totally unrelated; and c) rational expectations point to more competitive markets (such as that of the Pacific), while adaptive expectations indicate higher concentration and thus imperfect competition (as is the case in the North Atlantic). Our findings have important regulatory implications in the sense that, if one accepts, as we do, that adaptive expectations are consistent with concentrated industries, while rational expectations suggest more competition, then our paper suggests that the 2008 abolition of the liner conference system from European trades has failed to improve the level of competition in the Europe – US liner shipping markets.https://doi.org/10.1186/s41072-019-0057-2Liner shippingContainer shippingLiner conferencesFreight rate fluctuationsRational expectationsAdaptive expectations
spellingShingle Michael Fusillo
Hercules Haralambides
Do carrier expectations indicate industry structure in container shipping? An econometric analysis
Journal of Shipping and Trade
Liner shipping
Container shipping
Liner conferences
Freight rate fluctuations
Rational expectations
Adaptive expectations
title Do carrier expectations indicate industry structure in container shipping? An econometric analysis
title_full Do carrier expectations indicate industry structure in container shipping? An econometric analysis
title_fullStr Do carrier expectations indicate industry structure in container shipping? An econometric analysis
title_full_unstemmed Do carrier expectations indicate industry structure in container shipping? An econometric analysis
title_short Do carrier expectations indicate industry structure in container shipping? An econometric analysis
title_sort do carrier expectations indicate industry structure in container shipping an econometric analysis
topic Liner shipping
Container shipping
Liner conferences
Freight rate fluctuations
Rational expectations
Adaptive expectations
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s41072-019-0057-2
work_keys_str_mv AT michaelfusillo docarrierexpectationsindicateindustrystructureincontainershippinganeconometricanalysis
AT herculesharalambides docarrierexpectationsindicateindustrystructureincontainershippinganeconometricanalysis