Evaluation of Quality Indicators of Breast Cancer Management at a Tertiary Cancer Center in Nepal

PURPOSEBreast cancer is the second commonest cancer among female in Nepal. This is our first attempt to audit breast cancer management in our institute and compare with standard quality indicators (QIs) available.METHODSThe retrospective study included 104 female patients with breast cancer who had...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shweta Baral, Sudhir Raj Silwal, Utsav Man Shrestha, Deep Lamichhane
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Society of Clinical Oncology 2022-03-01
Series:JCO Global Oncology
Online Access:https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/GO.21.00303
_version_ 1818317621435564032
author Shweta Baral
Sudhir Raj Silwal
Utsav Man Shrestha
Deep Lamichhane
author_facet Shweta Baral
Sudhir Raj Silwal
Utsav Man Shrestha
Deep Lamichhane
author_sort Shweta Baral
collection DOAJ
description PURPOSEBreast cancer is the second commonest cancer among female in Nepal. This is our first attempt to audit breast cancer management in our institute and compare with standard quality indicators (QIs) available.METHODSThe retrospective study included 104 female patients with breast cancer who had taken treatment at Bhaktapur Cancer Hospital in 1 year. Participants were selected on the basis of convenience sampling. Of 33 QIs in breast cancer management according to European Society of Breast Cancer Specialists guidelines, 19 QIs were chosen relevant to our setup. These QIs were calculated for all patients and compared with the European Society of Breast Cancer Specialists standard target. Frequencies and percentages were calculated and presented in tables. Binomial 95% of the rates for QI adherence were also calculated for each QI.RESULTSOne hundred four patients had a median age of 47.5 years (range 24-70 years). Applicable QIs were in the range of 5-15 with a mean of 9.66 per patient. Of 19 evaluable QIs, very high adherence rates were observed in six QIs, high adherence in three Qis, and low adherences in 10 QIs. High adherence rates were for QI 5 and QI 10a, which were 88.46% and 94.73%, respectively. The low compliance was for QI 1, QI 4a, QI 8, QI 9d, QI 10b, QI 11a, QI 11b, QI 13b, QI 13e, and 14b, which were 53.84%, 78.21%, 0%, 83.16%, 76.92%, 36.0%, 33.33%, 4.76%, 30.55%, and 10.81%, respectively.CONCLUSIONThere are several QIs that have low levels of adherence in our setting and suggest that there is significant room for improvement. We will be continuing auditing these QIs regularly to improve our quality of care.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T09:40:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-19643f9b30e542d1a2db8bc5f9a89f82
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2687-8941
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T09:40:14Z
publishDate 2022-03-01
publisher American Society of Clinical Oncology
record_format Article
series JCO Global Oncology
spelling doaj.art-19643f9b30e542d1a2db8bc5f9a89f822022-12-21T23:52:13ZengAmerican Society of Clinical OncologyJCO Global Oncology2687-89412022-03-01810.1200/GO.21.00303Evaluation of Quality Indicators of Breast Cancer Management at a Tertiary Cancer Center in NepalShweta Baral0Sudhir Raj Silwal1Utsav Man Shrestha2Deep Lamichhane3Clinical Oncologist, Bhaktapur Cancer Hospital, Bhaktapur, NepalClinical Oncologist, Bhaktapur Cancer Hospital, Bhaktapur, NepalSurgical Oncologist, Bhaktapur Cancer Hospital, Bhaktapur, NepalSurgical Oncologist, Bhaktapur Cancer Hospital, Bhaktapur, NepalPURPOSEBreast cancer is the second commonest cancer among female in Nepal. This is our first attempt to audit breast cancer management in our institute and compare with standard quality indicators (QIs) available.METHODSThe retrospective study included 104 female patients with breast cancer who had taken treatment at Bhaktapur Cancer Hospital in 1 year. Participants were selected on the basis of convenience sampling. Of 33 QIs in breast cancer management according to European Society of Breast Cancer Specialists guidelines, 19 QIs were chosen relevant to our setup. These QIs were calculated for all patients and compared with the European Society of Breast Cancer Specialists standard target. Frequencies and percentages were calculated and presented in tables. Binomial 95% of the rates for QI adherence were also calculated for each QI.RESULTSOne hundred four patients had a median age of 47.5 years (range 24-70 years). Applicable QIs were in the range of 5-15 with a mean of 9.66 per patient. Of 19 evaluable QIs, very high adherence rates were observed in six QIs, high adherence in three Qis, and low adherences in 10 QIs. High adherence rates were for QI 5 and QI 10a, which were 88.46% and 94.73%, respectively. The low compliance was for QI 1, QI 4a, QI 8, QI 9d, QI 10b, QI 11a, QI 11b, QI 13b, QI 13e, and 14b, which were 53.84%, 78.21%, 0%, 83.16%, 76.92%, 36.0%, 33.33%, 4.76%, 30.55%, and 10.81%, respectively.CONCLUSIONThere are several QIs that have low levels of adherence in our setting and suggest that there is significant room for improvement. We will be continuing auditing these QIs regularly to improve our quality of care.https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/GO.21.00303
spellingShingle Shweta Baral
Sudhir Raj Silwal
Utsav Man Shrestha
Deep Lamichhane
Evaluation of Quality Indicators of Breast Cancer Management at a Tertiary Cancer Center in Nepal
JCO Global Oncology
title Evaluation of Quality Indicators of Breast Cancer Management at a Tertiary Cancer Center in Nepal
title_full Evaluation of Quality Indicators of Breast Cancer Management at a Tertiary Cancer Center in Nepal
title_fullStr Evaluation of Quality Indicators of Breast Cancer Management at a Tertiary Cancer Center in Nepal
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Quality Indicators of Breast Cancer Management at a Tertiary Cancer Center in Nepal
title_short Evaluation of Quality Indicators of Breast Cancer Management at a Tertiary Cancer Center in Nepal
title_sort evaluation of quality indicators of breast cancer management at a tertiary cancer center in nepal
url https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/GO.21.00303
work_keys_str_mv AT shwetabaral evaluationofqualityindicatorsofbreastcancermanagementatatertiarycancercenterinnepal
AT sudhirrajsilwal evaluationofqualityindicatorsofbreastcancermanagementatatertiarycancercenterinnepal
AT utsavmanshrestha evaluationofqualityindicatorsofbreastcancermanagementatatertiarycancercenterinnepal
AT deeplamichhane evaluationofqualityindicatorsofbreastcancermanagementatatertiarycancercenterinnepal