A systematic review of the effectiveness of strategies to improve health care provider performance in low- and middle-income countries: Methods and descriptive results.
<h4>Background</h4>Health care provider (HCP) performance in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is often inadequate. The Health Care Provider Performance Review (HCPPR) is a comprehensive systematic review of the effectiveness and cost of strategies to improve HCP performance in LM...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2019-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217617 |
| _version_ | 1798030170837221376 |
|---|---|
| author | Samantha Y Rowe David H Peters Kathleen A Holloway John Chalker Dennis Ross-Degnan Alexander K Rowe |
| author_facet | Samantha Y Rowe David H Peters Kathleen A Holloway John Chalker Dennis Ross-Degnan Alexander K Rowe |
| author_sort | Samantha Y Rowe |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <h4>Background</h4>Health care provider (HCP) performance in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is often inadequate. The Health Care Provider Performance Review (HCPPR) is a comprehensive systematic review of the effectiveness and cost of strategies to improve HCP performance in LMICs. We present the HCPPR's methods, describe methodological and contextual attributes of included studies, and examine time trends of study attributes.<h4>Methods</h4>The HCPPR includes studies from LMICs that quantitatively evaluated any strategy to improve HCP performance for any health condition, with no language restrictions. Eligible study designs were controlled trials and interrupted time series. In 2006, we searched 15 databases for published studies; in 2008 and 2010, we completed searches of 30 document inventories for unpublished studies. Data from eligible reports were double-abstracted and entered into a database, which is publicly available. The primary outcome measure was the strategy's effect size. We assessed time trends with logistic, Poisson, and negative binomial regression modeling. We were unable to register with PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews) because the protocol was developed prior to the PROSPERO launch.<h4>Results</h4>We screened 105,299 citations and included 824 reports from 499 studies of 161 intervention strategies. Most strategies had multiple components and were tested by only one study each. Studies were from 79 countries and had diverse methodologies, geographic settings, HCP types, work environments, and health conditions. Training, supervision, and patient and community supports were the most commonly evaluated strategy components. Only 33.6% of studies had a low or moderate risk of bias. From 1958-2003, the number of studies per year and study quality increased significantly over time, as did the proportion of studies from low-income countries. Only 36.3% of studies reported information on strategy cost or cost-effectiveness.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Studies have reported on the efficacy of many strategies to improve HCP performance in LMICs. However, most studies have important methodological limitations. The HCPPR is a publicly accessible resource for decision-makers, researchers, and others interested in improving HCP performance. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-11T19:37:00Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-197ae1e69ecc4d09b6edd04dc41c4bf9 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1932-6203 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-11T19:37:00Z |
| publishDate | 2019-01-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PLoS ONE |
| spelling | doaj.art-197ae1e69ecc4d09b6edd04dc41c4bf92022-12-22T04:06:50ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032019-01-01145e021761710.1371/journal.pone.0217617A systematic review of the effectiveness of strategies to improve health care provider performance in low- and middle-income countries: Methods and descriptive results.Samantha Y RoweDavid H PetersKathleen A HollowayJohn ChalkerDennis Ross-DegnanAlexander K Rowe<h4>Background</h4>Health care provider (HCP) performance in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is often inadequate. The Health Care Provider Performance Review (HCPPR) is a comprehensive systematic review of the effectiveness and cost of strategies to improve HCP performance in LMICs. We present the HCPPR's methods, describe methodological and contextual attributes of included studies, and examine time trends of study attributes.<h4>Methods</h4>The HCPPR includes studies from LMICs that quantitatively evaluated any strategy to improve HCP performance for any health condition, with no language restrictions. Eligible study designs were controlled trials and interrupted time series. In 2006, we searched 15 databases for published studies; in 2008 and 2010, we completed searches of 30 document inventories for unpublished studies. Data from eligible reports were double-abstracted and entered into a database, which is publicly available. The primary outcome measure was the strategy's effect size. We assessed time trends with logistic, Poisson, and negative binomial regression modeling. We were unable to register with PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews) because the protocol was developed prior to the PROSPERO launch.<h4>Results</h4>We screened 105,299 citations and included 824 reports from 499 studies of 161 intervention strategies. Most strategies had multiple components and were tested by only one study each. Studies were from 79 countries and had diverse methodologies, geographic settings, HCP types, work environments, and health conditions. Training, supervision, and patient and community supports were the most commonly evaluated strategy components. Only 33.6% of studies had a low or moderate risk of bias. From 1958-2003, the number of studies per year and study quality increased significantly over time, as did the proportion of studies from low-income countries. Only 36.3% of studies reported information on strategy cost or cost-effectiveness.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Studies have reported on the efficacy of many strategies to improve HCP performance in LMICs. However, most studies have important methodological limitations. The HCPPR is a publicly accessible resource for decision-makers, researchers, and others interested in improving HCP performance.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217617 |
| spellingShingle | Samantha Y Rowe David H Peters Kathleen A Holloway John Chalker Dennis Ross-Degnan Alexander K Rowe A systematic review of the effectiveness of strategies to improve health care provider performance in low- and middle-income countries: Methods and descriptive results. PLoS ONE |
| title | A systematic review of the effectiveness of strategies to improve health care provider performance in low- and middle-income countries: Methods and descriptive results. |
| title_full | A systematic review of the effectiveness of strategies to improve health care provider performance in low- and middle-income countries: Methods and descriptive results. |
| title_fullStr | A systematic review of the effectiveness of strategies to improve health care provider performance in low- and middle-income countries: Methods and descriptive results. |
| title_full_unstemmed | A systematic review of the effectiveness of strategies to improve health care provider performance in low- and middle-income countries: Methods and descriptive results. |
| title_short | A systematic review of the effectiveness of strategies to improve health care provider performance in low- and middle-income countries: Methods and descriptive results. |
| title_sort | systematic review of the effectiveness of strategies to improve health care provider performance in low and middle income countries methods and descriptive results |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217617 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT samanthayrowe asystematicreviewoftheeffectivenessofstrategiestoimprovehealthcareproviderperformanceinlowandmiddleincomecountriesmethodsanddescriptiveresults AT davidhpeters asystematicreviewoftheeffectivenessofstrategiestoimprovehealthcareproviderperformanceinlowandmiddleincomecountriesmethodsanddescriptiveresults AT kathleenaholloway asystematicreviewoftheeffectivenessofstrategiestoimprovehealthcareproviderperformanceinlowandmiddleincomecountriesmethodsanddescriptiveresults AT johnchalker asystematicreviewoftheeffectivenessofstrategiestoimprovehealthcareproviderperformanceinlowandmiddleincomecountriesmethodsanddescriptiveresults AT dennisrossdegnan asystematicreviewoftheeffectivenessofstrategiestoimprovehealthcareproviderperformanceinlowandmiddleincomecountriesmethodsanddescriptiveresults AT alexanderkrowe asystematicreviewoftheeffectivenessofstrategiestoimprovehealthcareproviderperformanceinlowandmiddleincomecountriesmethodsanddescriptiveresults AT samanthayrowe systematicreviewoftheeffectivenessofstrategiestoimprovehealthcareproviderperformanceinlowandmiddleincomecountriesmethodsanddescriptiveresults AT davidhpeters systematicreviewoftheeffectivenessofstrategiestoimprovehealthcareproviderperformanceinlowandmiddleincomecountriesmethodsanddescriptiveresults AT kathleenaholloway systematicreviewoftheeffectivenessofstrategiestoimprovehealthcareproviderperformanceinlowandmiddleincomecountriesmethodsanddescriptiveresults AT johnchalker systematicreviewoftheeffectivenessofstrategiestoimprovehealthcareproviderperformanceinlowandmiddleincomecountriesmethodsanddescriptiveresults AT dennisrossdegnan systematicreviewoftheeffectivenessofstrategiestoimprovehealthcareproviderperformanceinlowandmiddleincomecountriesmethodsanddescriptiveresults AT alexanderkrowe systematicreviewoftheeffectivenessofstrategiestoimprovehealthcareproviderperformanceinlowandmiddleincomecountriesmethodsanddescriptiveresults |