Circumcision registry promotes precise research and fosters informed parental decisions
Abstract Background In 2017 Ploug and Holm argued that anonymizing individuals in the Danish circumcision registry was insufficient to protect these individuals from what they regard as the potential harms of being in the registry (overreaching social pressure, stigmatization, medicalization of a re...
Main Authors: | Robert S. Van Howe, Morten Frisch, Peter W. Adler, J. Steven Svoboda |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2019-01-01
|
Series: | BMC Medical Ethics |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12910-018-0337-7 |
Similar Items
-
Informed consent and registry-based research - the case of the Danish circumcision registry
by: Thomas Ploug, et al.
Published: (2017-09-01) -
Parental Regret Following Decision to Revise Circumcision
by: Noam Bar-Yaakov, et al.
Published: (2022-03-01) -
Situating parents’ circumcision decision-making within health research, knowledge, and experience
by: Karli M. Reeves, et al.
Published: (2022-12-01) -
Ecologic fallacy and the social ecology of circumcision
by: Joseph G. L. Lee, et al.
Published: (2012-06-01) -
Parental circumcision preferences and early outcome of plastibell circumcision in a Nigerian tertiary hospital
by: Okechukwu Hyginus Ekwunife, et al.
Published: (2015-01-01)