Kinetics of hydrate formation, dissociation and reformation

Hydrates in natural sediments are never able to reach thermodynamic equilibrium because of in balance between number of independent thermodynamic variables and constraints (conservation and equilibrium conditions). In this work I present a consistent thermodynamic approach in which all components in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bjørn Kvamme
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-03-01
Series:Chemical Thermodynamics and Thermal Analysis
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266731262100002X
_version_ 1818739073006698496
author Bjørn Kvamme
author_facet Bjørn Kvamme
author_sort Bjørn Kvamme
collection DOAJ
description Hydrates in natural sediments are never able to reach thermodynamic equilibrium because of in balance between number of independent thermodynamic variables and constraints (conservation and equilibrium conditions). In this work I present a consistent thermodynamic approach in which all components in all phases have the same reference state (ideal gas). Gibbs free energy and Enthalpy are modelled within the same concept and thermodynamic consistency is demonstrated though couplings between classical thermodynamics and statistical mechanics. The use of residual thermodynamics for all phases provides unique tools for comparing stability of different phases in terms of free energy. This is particularly important for hydrates forming from different phases. Since thermodynamic equilibrium is not possible then chemical potentials for guest molecules are not the same in each phase, Heterogeneous hydrate formation on gas/liquid interface will result in different hydrate than hydrate forming from dissolved hydrate former in water. It is also demonstrated that hydrate stability cannot be discussed in terms of independent thermodynamics variables like for instance temperature and pressure. As specific example we show that carbon dioxide is more stable than methane hydrate over the whole range of temperature and pressure. I also demonstrate that it is possible to modify Classical Nucleation Theory (CNT) though inclusion of a new mass transport term that also introduces an interface to the theory. As illustration we show that the modified CNT is able to predict experimental induction times for methane hydrate and carbon dioxide with very reasonable values for diffusivity coefficients on the liquid water side of hydrate/liquid water interface.
first_indexed 2024-12-18T01:19:02Z
format Article
id doaj.art-199224c7a61143b0b40c8b2b66b5bdd5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2667-3126
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-18T01:19:02Z
publishDate 2021-03-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Chemical Thermodynamics and Thermal Analysis
spelling doaj.art-199224c7a61143b0b40c8b2b66b5bdd52022-12-21T21:25:53ZengElsevierChemical Thermodynamics and Thermal Analysis2667-31262021-03-011100004Kinetics of hydrate formation, dissociation and reformationBjørn Kvamme0State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Southwest Petroleum University, Xindu Road No.8, Chengdu 610500, China; Strategic Carbon LLC, 20 Ladd St., Suite 200, Portsmouth, NH 03801, USA; Hyzenenergy, 26701 Quail Creek, Laguna Hills, CA, 92656, USAHydrates in natural sediments are never able to reach thermodynamic equilibrium because of in balance between number of independent thermodynamic variables and constraints (conservation and equilibrium conditions). In this work I present a consistent thermodynamic approach in which all components in all phases have the same reference state (ideal gas). Gibbs free energy and Enthalpy are modelled within the same concept and thermodynamic consistency is demonstrated though couplings between classical thermodynamics and statistical mechanics. The use of residual thermodynamics for all phases provides unique tools for comparing stability of different phases in terms of free energy. This is particularly important for hydrates forming from different phases. Since thermodynamic equilibrium is not possible then chemical potentials for guest molecules are not the same in each phase, Heterogeneous hydrate formation on gas/liquid interface will result in different hydrate than hydrate forming from dissolved hydrate former in water. It is also demonstrated that hydrate stability cannot be discussed in terms of independent thermodynamics variables like for instance temperature and pressure. As specific example we show that carbon dioxide is more stable than methane hydrate over the whole range of temperature and pressure. I also demonstrate that it is possible to modify Classical Nucleation Theory (CNT) though inclusion of a new mass transport term that also introduces an interface to the theory. As illustration we show that the modified CNT is able to predict experimental induction times for methane hydrate and carbon dioxide with very reasonable values for diffusivity coefficients on the liquid water side of hydrate/liquid water interface.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266731262100002XWordHydrateNon-equilibriumThermodynamicsKinetics
spellingShingle Bjørn Kvamme
Kinetics of hydrate formation, dissociation and reformation
Chemical Thermodynamics and Thermal Analysis
Word
Hydrate
Non-equilibrium
Thermodynamics
Kinetics
title Kinetics of hydrate formation, dissociation and reformation
title_full Kinetics of hydrate formation, dissociation and reformation
title_fullStr Kinetics of hydrate formation, dissociation and reformation
title_full_unstemmed Kinetics of hydrate formation, dissociation and reformation
title_short Kinetics of hydrate formation, dissociation and reformation
title_sort kinetics of hydrate formation dissociation and reformation
topic Word
Hydrate
Non-equilibrium
Thermodynamics
Kinetics
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266731262100002X
work_keys_str_mv AT bjørnkvamme kineticsofhydrateformationdissociationandreformation