The effects of an editor serving as one of the reviewers during the peer-review process [version 2; referees: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
Background Publishing in scientific journals is one of the most important ways in which scientists disseminate research to their peers and to the wider public. Pre-publication peer review underpins this process, but peer review is subject to various criticisms and is under pressure from growth in th...
Main Authors: | Marco Giordan, Attila Csikasz-Nagy, Andrew M. Collings, Federico Vaggi |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
F1000 Research Ltd
2016-10-01
|
Series: | F1000Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://f1000research.com/articles/5-683/v2 |
Similar Items
-
The effects of an editor serving as one of the reviewers during the peer-review process [version 1; referees: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
by: Marco Giordan, et al.
Published: (2016-04-01) -
We can shift academic culture through publishing choices [version 2; referees: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
by: Corina J Logan
Published: (2017-06-01) -
Make researchers revisit past publications to improve reproducibility [version 1; referees: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
by: Clare Fiala, et al.
Published: (2017-09-01) -
What is open peer review? A systematic review [version 1; referees: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
by: Tony Ross-Hellauer
Published: (2017-04-01) -
What do we know about grant peer review in the health sciences? [version 2; referees: 2 approved]
by: Susan Guthrie, et al.
Published: (2018-03-01)