Optimum livestock holding for exit out of poverty: A comparative analysis in rural Tamil Nadu

An attempt was made to assess the income generating capacity of selected livestock species reared by resource poor rural farmers and to estimate minimum livestock holding required to be reared by the households to escape out of poverty in rural Tamil Nadu. The data were collected through personal i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: G SENTHILKUMAR, K N SELVAKUMAR, M PRABU, A SERMA SARAVANA PANDIAN, C VALLI, N K SUDEEPKUMAR, B JAYAVARATHAN
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Indian Council of Agricultural Research 2016-10-01
Series:Indian Journal of Animal Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/IJAnS/article/view/62430
_version_ 1797745876616085504
author G SENTHILKUMAR
K N SELVAKUMAR
M PRABU
A SERMA SARAVANA PANDIAN
C VALLI
N K SUDEEPKUMAR
B JAYAVARATHAN
author_facet G SENTHILKUMAR
K N SELVAKUMAR
M PRABU
A SERMA SARAVANA PANDIAN
C VALLI
N K SUDEEPKUMAR
B JAYAVARATHAN
author_sort G SENTHILKUMAR
collection DOAJ
description An attempt was made to assess the income generating capacity of selected livestock species reared by resource poor rural farmers and to estimate minimum livestock holding required to be reared by the households to escape out of poverty in rural Tamil Nadu. The data were collected through personal interview using pre-tested interview schedule from 213 livestock farmers from the six districts covering four agro-climatic zones of Tamil Nadu. Economics of cattle, buffalo, sheep and goat farming were worked out in order to estimate and compare the income generated from various livestock enterprises. The monthly income earned by the sample respondents was calculated to be ` 941.52/cattle, ` 932.72/buffalo, ` 125.91/sheep and ` 140.52/goat. Further, the study revealed that a household could tide over the poverty line without any other income source, if they rear a minimum of about 6 cattle (5.32 cattle) or 6 buffaloes (5.37 buffaloes) or 40 sheep (39.79 sheep) or 36 goat (35.65 goat). The present findings might be considered while implementing any poverty alleviation programmes with livestock component. Depending upon the locality and resources availability, suitable livestock species might be recommended to lift the poor from poverty trap and to sustain them with stable income.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T15:30:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-19a38f5f408a4d09b77e17bf257e9db0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0367-8318
2394-3327
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T15:30:13Z
publishDate 2016-10-01
publisher Indian Council of Agricultural Research
record_format Article
series Indian Journal of Animal Sciences
spelling doaj.art-19a38f5f408a4d09b77e17bf257e9db02023-08-10T06:47:40ZengIndian Council of Agricultural ResearchIndian Journal of Animal Sciences0367-83182394-33272016-10-01861010.56093/ijans.v86i10.62430Optimum livestock holding for exit out of poverty: A comparative analysis in rural Tamil NaduG SENTHILKUMAR0K N SELVAKUMAR1M PRABU2A SERMA SARAVANA PANDIAN3C VALLI4N K SUDEEPKUMAR5B JAYAVARATHAN6Madras Veterinary College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600 007 IndiaVeterinary College and Research Institute, OrathanaduMadras Veterinary College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600 007 IndiaMadras Veterinary College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600 007 IndiaMadras Veterinary College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600 007 IndiaMadras Veterinary College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600 007 IndiaMadras Veterinary College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600 007 India An attempt was made to assess the income generating capacity of selected livestock species reared by resource poor rural farmers and to estimate minimum livestock holding required to be reared by the households to escape out of poverty in rural Tamil Nadu. The data were collected through personal interview using pre-tested interview schedule from 213 livestock farmers from the six districts covering four agro-climatic zones of Tamil Nadu. Economics of cattle, buffalo, sheep and goat farming were worked out in order to estimate and compare the income generated from various livestock enterprises. The monthly income earned by the sample respondents was calculated to be ` 941.52/cattle, ` 932.72/buffalo, ` 125.91/sheep and ` 140.52/goat. Further, the study revealed that a household could tide over the poverty line without any other income source, if they rear a minimum of about 6 cattle (5.32 cattle) or 6 buffaloes (5.37 buffaloes) or 40 sheep (39.79 sheep) or 36 goat (35.65 goat). The present findings might be considered while implementing any poverty alleviation programmes with livestock component. Depending upon the locality and resources availability, suitable livestock species might be recommended to lift the poor from poverty trap and to sustain them with stable income. https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/IJAnS/article/view/62430BuffaloCattleGoatIncomeLivestockPoverty
spellingShingle G SENTHILKUMAR
K N SELVAKUMAR
M PRABU
A SERMA SARAVANA PANDIAN
C VALLI
N K SUDEEPKUMAR
B JAYAVARATHAN
Optimum livestock holding for exit out of poverty: A comparative analysis in rural Tamil Nadu
Indian Journal of Animal Sciences
Buffalo
Cattle
Goat
Income
Livestock
Poverty
title Optimum livestock holding for exit out of poverty: A comparative analysis in rural Tamil Nadu
title_full Optimum livestock holding for exit out of poverty: A comparative analysis in rural Tamil Nadu
title_fullStr Optimum livestock holding for exit out of poverty: A comparative analysis in rural Tamil Nadu
title_full_unstemmed Optimum livestock holding for exit out of poverty: A comparative analysis in rural Tamil Nadu
title_short Optimum livestock holding for exit out of poverty: A comparative analysis in rural Tamil Nadu
title_sort optimum livestock holding for exit out of poverty a comparative analysis in rural tamil nadu
topic Buffalo
Cattle
Goat
Income
Livestock
Poverty
url https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/IJAnS/article/view/62430
work_keys_str_mv AT gsenthilkumar optimumlivestockholdingforexitoutofpovertyacomparativeanalysisinruraltamilnadu
AT knselvakumar optimumlivestockholdingforexitoutofpovertyacomparativeanalysisinruraltamilnadu
AT mprabu optimumlivestockholdingforexitoutofpovertyacomparativeanalysisinruraltamilnadu
AT asermasaravanapandian optimumlivestockholdingforexitoutofpovertyacomparativeanalysisinruraltamilnadu
AT cvalli optimumlivestockholdingforexitoutofpovertyacomparativeanalysisinruraltamilnadu
AT nksudeepkumar optimumlivestockholdingforexitoutofpovertyacomparativeanalysisinruraltamilnadu
AT bjayavarathan optimumlivestockholdingforexitoutofpovertyacomparativeanalysisinruraltamilnadu