Comment on “Glass Transition, Crystallization of Glass-Forming Melts, and Entropy” Entropy 2018, 20, 103.

In a recent article, Schmelzer and Tropin [Entropy 2018, 20, 103] presented a critique of several aspects of modern glass science, including various features of glass transition and relaxation, crystallization, and the definition of glass itself. We argue that these criticisms are at odds with well-...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Edgar D. Zanotto, John C. Mauro
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-09-01
Series:Entropy
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/20/9/703
_version_ 1818035264830832640
author Edgar D. Zanotto
John C. Mauro
author_facet Edgar D. Zanotto
John C. Mauro
author_sort Edgar D. Zanotto
collection DOAJ
description In a recent article, Schmelzer and Tropin [Entropy 2018, 20, 103] presented a critique of several aspects of modern glass science, including various features of glass transition and relaxation, crystallization, and the definition of glass itself. We argue that these criticisms are at odds with well-accepted knowledge in the field from both theory and experiments. The objective of this short comment is to clarify several of these issues.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T06:52:18Z
format Article
id doaj.art-19a8c414dcce4f3eb901452b792aee9b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1099-4300
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T06:52:18Z
publishDate 2018-09-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Entropy
spelling doaj.art-19a8c414dcce4f3eb901452b792aee9b2022-12-22T01:58:30ZengMDPI AGEntropy1099-43002018-09-0120970310.3390/e20090703e20090703Comment on “Glass Transition, Crystallization of Glass-Forming Melts, and Entropy” Entropy 2018, 20, 103.Edgar D. Zanotto0John C. Mauro1Department of Materials Engineering, Center for Research, Technology and Education in Vitreous Materials, Federal University of São Carlos, São Paulo 13.565-905, BrazilDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USAIn a recent article, Schmelzer and Tropin [Entropy 2018, 20, 103] presented a critique of several aspects of modern glass science, including various features of glass transition and relaxation, crystallization, and the definition of glass itself. We argue that these criticisms are at odds with well-accepted knowledge in the field from both theory and experiments. The objective of this short comment is to clarify several of these issues.http://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/20/9/703glassthermodynamicsentropyrelaxationviscositystatistical mechanics
spellingShingle Edgar D. Zanotto
John C. Mauro
Comment on “Glass Transition, Crystallization of Glass-Forming Melts, and Entropy” Entropy 2018, 20, 103.
Entropy
glass
thermodynamics
entropy
relaxation
viscosity
statistical mechanics
title Comment on “Glass Transition, Crystallization of Glass-Forming Melts, and Entropy” Entropy 2018, 20, 103.
title_full Comment on “Glass Transition, Crystallization of Glass-Forming Melts, and Entropy” Entropy 2018, 20, 103.
title_fullStr Comment on “Glass Transition, Crystallization of Glass-Forming Melts, and Entropy” Entropy 2018, 20, 103.
title_full_unstemmed Comment on “Glass Transition, Crystallization of Glass-Forming Melts, and Entropy” Entropy 2018, 20, 103.
title_short Comment on “Glass Transition, Crystallization of Glass-Forming Melts, and Entropy” Entropy 2018, 20, 103.
title_sort comment on glass transition crystallization of glass forming melts and entropy entropy 2018 20 103
topic glass
thermodynamics
entropy
relaxation
viscosity
statistical mechanics
url http://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/20/9/703
work_keys_str_mv AT edgardzanotto commentonglasstransitioncrystallizationofglassformingmeltsandentropyentropy201820103
AT johncmauro commentonglasstransitioncrystallizationofglassformingmeltsandentropyentropy201820103