Test–retest reliability of mandibular morphology measurements on cone-beam computed tomography-synthesized cephalograms with random head positioning errors

Abstract Background Cephalometric radiography has been used for orthodontic and surgical treatment planning and assessment, and for quantifying mandibular growth. However, it remains unclear how head positioning errors and the level of examiner experience affect the reliability of such morphometric...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hsien-Shu Lin, Yunn-Jy Chen, Hsuan-Lun Lu, Tung-Wu Lu, Chien-Chih Chen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2017-05-01
Series:BioMedical Engineering OnLine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12938-017-0353-8
_version_ 1818218483663503360
author Hsien-Shu Lin
Yunn-Jy Chen
Hsuan-Lun Lu
Tung-Wu Lu
Chien-Chih Chen
author_facet Hsien-Shu Lin
Yunn-Jy Chen
Hsuan-Lun Lu
Tung-Wu Lu
Chien-Chih Chen
author_sort Hsien-Shu Lin
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Cephalometric radiography has been used for orthodontic and surgical treatment planning and assessment, and for quantifying mandibular growth. However, it remains unclear how head positioning errors and the level of examiner experience affect the reliability of such morphometric measurements. The current study aimed to bridge the gap by determining the intra-, inter-rater, and inter-session reliability of measurements of mandibular morphology with random head positioning errors as measured by a junior and a senior dentist. Methods Cone-beam computed tomography data of twelve mandibles were obtained with each rotated randomly away from the neutral position within the range of +3 and −3° along each of the anatomical axes to simulate six imaging trials. A synthetic cephalogram for each trial was obtained via a digitally reconstructed radiography (DRR) technique and eleven landmarks for twelve morphological parameters on the cephalogram were identified manually six times by a junior and a senior dentist. The procedure was repeated on another day within 5 days. Test–retest reliability was assessed in terms of an intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) using a two-way mixed-effects model. Results Good to very good intra-rater (senior: ICC > 0.92; junior: ICC > 0.78), inter-rater (ICC > 0.70 for most parameters) and inter-session reliability (senior: ICC > 0.84; junior: ICC > 0.62) were found. Bland & Altman plots of inter-rater comparisons show that there were systematical biases between the examiners on most parameters, except for the distance between Gonion and Pogonion. Conclusions The current results suggest that good to very good intra-rater, inter-rater and inter-session reliability can be achieved for most parameters with randomized head positioning errors; higher inter-session reliability can be achieved by more experienced examiners; and that long-term monitoring of mandibular growth based on cephalographic measurements should be made by the same more experienced examiner. The current DRR-based approach can be used to evaluate individual factors that affect the morphological measurements.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T07:24:29Z
format Article
id doaj.art-19b3416af9314f5685dfd68d85daf787
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1475-925X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T07:24:29Z
publishDate 2017-05-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BioMedical Engineering OnLine
spelling doaj.art-19b3416af9314f5685dfd68d85daf7872022-12-22T00:33:12ZengBMCBioMedical Engineering OnLine1475-925X2017-05-0116111410.1186/s12938-017-0353-8Test–retest reliability of mandibular morphology measurements on cone-beam computed tomography-synthesized cephalograms with random head positioning errorsHsien-Shu Lin0Yunn-Jy Chen1Hsuan-Lun Lu2Tung-Wu Lu3Chien-Chih Chen4Department of Dentistry, School of Dentistry, National Taiwan University HospitalDepartment of Dentistry, School of Dentistry, National Taiwan University HospitalInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, National Taiwan UniversityInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, National Taiwan UniversityDepartment of Dentistry, School of Dentistry, National Taiwan University HospitalAbstract Background Cephalometric radiography has been used for orthodontic and surgical treatment planning and assessment, and for quantifying mandibular growth. However, it remains unclear how head positioning errors and the level of examiner experience affect the reliability of such morphometric measurements. The current study aimed to bridge the gap by determining the intra-, inter-rater, and inter-session reliability of measurements of mandibular morphology with random head positioning errors as measured by a junior and a senior dentist. Methods Cone-beam computed tomography data of twelve mandibles were obtained with each rotated randomly away from the neutral position within the range of +3 and −3° along each of the anatomical axes to simulate six imaging trials. A synthetic cephalogram for each trial was obtained via a digitally reconstructed radiography (DRR) technique and eleven landmarks for twelve morphological parameters on the cephalogram were identified manually six times by a junior and a senior dentist. The procedure was repeated on another day within 5 days. Test–retest reliability was assessed in terms of an intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) using a two-way mixed-effects model. Results Good to very good intra-rater (senior: ICC > 0.92; junior: ICC > 0.78), inter-rater (ICC > 0.70 for most parameters) and inter-session reliability (senior: ICC > 0.84; junior: ICC > 0.62) were found. Bland & Altman plots of inter-rater comparisons show that there were systematical biases between the examiners on most parameters, except for the distance between Gonion and Pogonion. Conclusions The current results suggest that good to very good intra-rater, inter-rater and inter-session reliability can be achieved for most parameters with randomized head positioning errors; higher inter-session reliability can be achieved by more experienced examiners; and that long-term monitoring of mandibular growth based on cephalographic measurements should be made by the same more experienced examiner. The current DRR-based approach can be used to evaluate individual factors that affect the morphological measurements.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12938-017-0353-8Intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC)MandibleReliabilitySimulated radiographHead positioning
spellingShingle Hsien-Shu Lin
Yunn-Jy Chen
Hsuan-Lun Lu
Tung-Wu Lu
Chien-Chih Chen
Test–retest reliability of mandibular morphology measurements on cone-beam computed tomography-synthesized cephalograms with random head positioning errors
BioMedical Engineering OnLine
Intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC)
Mandible
Reliability
Simulated radiograph
Head positioning
title Test–retest reliability of mandibular morphology measurements on cone-beam computed tomography-synthesized cephalograms with random head positioning errors
title_full Test–retest reliability of mandibular morphology measurements on cone-beam computed tomography-synthesized cephalograms with random head positioning errors
title_fullStr Test–retest reliability of mandibular morphology measurements on cone-beam computed tomography-synthesized cephalograms with random head positioning errors
title_full_unstemmed Test–retest reliability of mandibular morphology measurements on cone-beam computed tomography-synthesized cephalograms with random head positioning errors
title_short Test–retest reliability of mandibular morphology measurements on cone-beam computed tomography-synthesized cephalograms with random head positioning errors
title_sort test retest reliability of mandibular morphology measurements on cone beam computed tomography synthesized cephalograms with random head positioning errors
topic Intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC)
Mandible
Reliability
Simulated radiograph
Head positioning
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12938-017-0353-8
work_keys_str_mv AT hsienshulin testretestreliabilityofmandibularmorphologymeasurementsonconebeamcomputedtomographysynthesizedcephalogramswithrandomheadpositioningerrors
AT yunnjychen testretestreliabilityofmandibularmorphologymeasurementsonconebeamcomputedtomographysynthesizedcephalogramswithrandomheadpositioningerrors
AT hsuanlunlu testretestreliabilityofmandibularmorphologymeasurementsonconebeamcomputedtomographysynthesizedcephalogramswithrandomheadpositioningerrors
AT tungwulu testretestreliabilityofmandibularmorphologymeasurementsonconebeamcomputedtomographysynthesizedcephalogramswithrandomheadpositioningerrors
AT chienchihchen testretestreliabilityofmandibularmorphologymeasurementsonconebeamcomputedtomographysynthesizedcephalogramswithrandomheadpositioningerrors